ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:12 PM
Original message |
If Clinton destroys the party and Paul supporters fuck up the RNC convention. |
|
Edited on Wed May-28-08 12:21 PM by ej510
The one good thing that could come out of this... is a government that is not run by 2 parties and maybe just maybe we could get a government similar to a parliamentary system.
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No, that would give the left an actual voice |
|
A thought too scary for American Politics.
|
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I agree that is why most western countries are far more progressive than us. |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Clinton has not and will not destroy the party. |
|
I disagree with the premise. If the party is destroyed the Obamites must assume some of the blame.
|
unpossibles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. look, I said something similar to an Obama supporter last night: PLEASE STOP |
|
perhaps we should try to not fling crap at each other?
For the record, I also disagree with the premise.
|
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. More parties equal more voices. More voices equals less corruption. |
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Political parties are going to become obsolete very soon. |
|
Or at least have much less influence. Funding will come from individual donors rather than big party contributors.
|
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-28-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I hope so we need more unaffiliated canidates. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message |