|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:42 PM Original message |
Poll: Clinton wins = 300 electoral votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. BlooInBloo's prediction: Clinton receives *0* electoral votes in the general election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. That, of course, makes more sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. (notes the date and time someone said I made sense) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. If we elected our candidates from extended leads in polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. If we elected our candidates from polls six months out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Yeah, the polls back then said she would have won by a landslide of delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. What if elections aren't fair to Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. What IS fair to Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. The NY senate race where the other Democrats got out of the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Aka Nita Lowey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Nita Lowey stood back and waited for her turn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why didn't they do the other primary losers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Freaky Deaky n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. does anyone really care anymore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Just hung up on today's conference call, did ya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. *yawn* sorry, but no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RooferDem (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks for posting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. Welcome to DU...you magnificent bastard! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Just think, you'll have these hypothetical scenarios to mull over forever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Poll - Clinton Loses Primary - Can't proceed to GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. I prefer this one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. That one doesn't matter until Clinton has conceded. Until then, the only person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
americanstranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Check my new sig! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. Well, shit howdy, let's stop the whole thing now and inaugurate her tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. FACT: She can't beat Obama, therefore, she won't be in the GE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. She lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. that's the Dem gal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Wow! A Pithy One-Liner... Haven't Seen One Of Those For A While |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. Too Bad. She's not going to be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
18. Clearly holding all those primaries and caucuses was a waste of time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Clinton/Lieberman ... Sore Loser Party candidates in November. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. She also has more roses in her garden than the Obamas so that means SHE'S WON THE PRIMARY! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. Did another blast memo just get issued from Camp Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
24. Deleted message |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Nice response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. yeah, but you can't have it both ways. The poster says we should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. No, the response is inappropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Who are you voting for in November? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. I don't work for his campaign, fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Who said that you did???? I said supporter not staffer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Yeah, as classy as the crap I've seen from Hillary people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
28. Poll: Pee Wee Herman beats the crap out of Mike Tyson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
29. How does Ron Paul do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
32. Maybe this matters in 2016!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
36. Whatever, people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Our experienced candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. I honestly think that she's ready for the job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxbow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Did you hear this quote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. That's the only argument you guys have anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. You must be jesting!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. No greener than Bill Clinton in 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. We have some late-breaking news: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
37. We don't elect a nominee with POLLS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyAnne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
52. That's well and good, but superdelegates would be insane to go against the will of the people and, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. "...in the 20 states where SHE CLAIMED victory..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_Bonanza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
55. Polls in May mean JACK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC