|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 07:45 PM Original message |
*** If MI were OK, Obama would STILL win the Popular Vote *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. No takers from the Clinton camp? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Now of course, if you wanna drop the caucus states where there was no "popular vote".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. kick..good work .. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Another kick.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thanks... I edited to ensure it remains true once all PR votes are counted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Surely, there were more than 1,600 people who voted in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. What's the story with those Iowa numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. They are the final tally based on their caucus system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Then you're comparing apples to oranges. (not YOU, but the generic "you") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:04 PM Original message |
And that is why there is no popular vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Smart move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. KNR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. K&R and off to the Greatest page! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PseudoIntellect (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. Lol, popular vote is the most obscure, unofficial, ambiguous statistic pushed as an argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. There Is NO Popular Vote, argh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Then WHY does the Clinton camp CONTINUE to talk about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Because we let them get away with lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I know. On the other hand, BS needs to be refuted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Refute it by saying... There Is No Popular Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Why did Obama mention it constantly when he was ahead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. He still IS ahead. Didn't you read the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. I read the OP's fantasy numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. He always qualified it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. because it's a good argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Do you think the superdelegates are stupid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Idiot and Insane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-01-08 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
26. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. those numbers are low for Obama too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexanDem (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
28. K&R -- Good work. I wish somebody would show this to Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC