Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:05 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Should "rec this thread if..." posts be outlawed? |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 05:19 PM by Bleachers7
Another DUer brought this up. I apologize to the mods if my poll is inappropriate. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6275118My view is posted below.
|
Midlodemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm gonna rec this thread. |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that they should be locked. They are not being rec'd for the proper reason.
|
dubeskin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If you don't want to rec it, don't |
|
Nothing is stopping you from just not recommending it. Just don't. I think what would be better though is a poll, because essentially that's what it is. It is a poll in which only one side can really vote. However, if you say "No, you're not allowed to post threads like this" that sort of takes away the ability to post your thoughts and have others agree or disagree.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think you got it half right. |
|
If you want to do this, post a poll or post your opinion. Those types of posts are abusing the feature.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
6. This is why we need negative rec power! |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. That wouldn't work on a political forum. |
|
Then the most dominant group would bury anything they didn't like. Specifically, anything anti-Obama would have been buried this year.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. eh, silly season's pretty much over |
|
we can now rate posts the old fashioned way:
who offers the best sexual favors.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
I like the way you think. :rofl:
|
Mezzo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. we should let them continue with child like bandwagons. |
|
I think it looks juvenile, but you get three posts a day, and to each his own, yanno?
|
ContinentalOp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Yeah they're pretty silly |
|
Probably should be against the rules.
|
NV Whino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
12. i suppose you want this thread recc'd? |
FlyingSquirrel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I suppose you want a 5th rec or something... |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
14. if you ask for it, it will come and you will get many and you will go to the top of the greatest |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I still wish we had an "un rec" function |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
16. The first or near-first one that got like 2 gazillion recs was awesome.... |
|
Every single one after was fucking FAIL.
Ban them.
|
FatDave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I think they should be allowed only if... |
|
...they are not serious and only if they are not making fun of another DUer unless that person deserves it. Whether or not they deserve it will be determined by a "rec this thread".
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
18. they are a temporary aberration. nothing more. nothing less. |
|
they will fade just as our Double Secret XGB1-101-C(3) Plan that we had a while back.
|
Fly by night
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
19. We've been invaded by needy, aging cheerleaders or emeritus high school student body Presidents. |
|
Go away. Shoo. Lock. Amen
|
Fly by night
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. ********** BTW, rec this thread.********** |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:22 PM by Fly by night
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm going with the eventual winning side (delivered by DU's Superdelegates).
|
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Highly recommended thread |
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Put them in a separate forum & greatest page. General Discussion: Pep Rally |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message |