Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why did Hillary think that waiting to endorse would increase her leverage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:14 PM
Original message
So why did Hillary think that waiting to endorse would increase her leverage?
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:20 PM by sfam
How is it that these politically astute people - masters by some accounts, that being confrontational with Obama and not endorsing would increase her leverage? My question isn't whether she's a rotten person or not - we all have opinions on that. My question is more how they could have been sooo off-base on this?

Regular party supporters like us could CLEARLY see this was a horrid idea (I'm referring to the withholding of the endorsement, not whether or not she would make a good VP). Why on earth did Hillary think this was the right way to go to get what she wanted?

Like seriously? Are they just deluded to the point of absurdity, or is it just that they were soo in the bubble that they couldn't see the forest from the trees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Again, what do you mean, a horrid idea?
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:17 PM by shenmue
She got the popular vote. That's a very good reason to "want" to be VP. That's how many others have been picked in the past.

And what's so terrible about wanting to be VP?

Why must you attribute anything else to her?

Again, more hatred and derision of someone you don't even know. If Clinton wants to do *anything*, it must be evil. It must be unreasonable craving (nice stereotype, by the way) instead of the normal reaction at times like this.

:eyes:

:puke:

Obama fanatics at DU lost credibility a long time ago, but this is getting pathetic. I think some of you are going to spontaneously combust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I felt the OP was worded very fairly. I think you're finding conflict where there is none.
my advice: take a week off, drink some beers, relax, and then come back ready to support the nominee. If you can't come back in a week ready to do that, don't come back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Please reread my OP. You are misunderstanding my question...
The horrid idea was withholding endorsement, not wanting the VP. I'll be happy with whomever Obama chooses for the VP. I trust his judgment.

But clearly, Hillary's approach to her speech last night was fatally flawed, as most of her closest supporters have finally convinced her. My question is how could her campaign have so horribly miscalculated this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. how could i have never noticed you before
HUGS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. She didn't get the majority of the "popular vote" ...
... but don't let facts get in your way. And even if she had, it is irrelevant; the nomination is decided by delegate count, which she decidedly lost.

The fact that she "wants" the VP slot is of no consequence. I should think this entire process would have confirmed the fact that just because Hillary "wants" something, that doesn't mean she gets it - nor does it mean she is entitled to it.

Whether "Obama fanatics" or "Hillary fanatics" lost their credibility during this campaign is neither here nor there. It was Hillary herself who lost credibility as a candidate - which is why she's on the losing side of this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. "She got the popular vote"???
Democrats Obama Clinton
Total Delegates 2,174 1,922
Super Delegates 408 283
Pledged Delegates 1,767 1,640
Popular Vote 17,535,458 17,493,836

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
Seems to me that your math is a bit flawed.
Don't forget what Hillary said about the Michigan primary "It's clear. This election they're having is not going to count for anything.". So I guess she was against counting Michigan until it became another fallback/firewall state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. You're just throwing up all over DU tonight.
Number 1: The OP was not "hating" on Hillary.

Number 2: Hillary did not win the popular vote.

Number 3: You are pathetic and sound like you're about to spontaneously combust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think she has some serious psychological problems.
She needs help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. seemingly a lot of her campaign's decisions were perplexing
and this was one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The month of February comes to mind
About Valentines day it kind of became clear she simply wasn't going to contest any of those states. It was astounding. I think a lot of this reflects the 20-year-old politics she's still stuck in: big donors, big states, big moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Agreed. They clearly had horrid strategy...but it seems that their short term decision making is...
even worse, at least in the last week or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. That was a real miss, judgement-wise
It's puzzling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Perhaps we can just put it down to complete exhaustion and anger over the loss...
This really might be it. OK, we all know they had horrid strategy, but this is really basic stuff here. You don't jam the nominee as if you were looking for a coalition government. NOBODY will buy that approach, including Hillary if she's looking at it from the outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yeah, truly that's the only explanation that works, I think
She's too smart for that otherwise.

Oh well. I think he's big enough to see that as well, and then we move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. What has she gotten right this campaign?
I've been astounded by most if not all of the decisions she's made in the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Actually, I thought they started doing lots better after the race was essentially over...
Hillary's campaign seemed to finally get on track in April or so. But these last few days have been an abomination on a lot of levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll take "deluded to the point of absurdity" for $1,000, Alex.
The only logic (or what passes for logic in the Hill camp these days) I can see in this is that she thought that at the very last minute, when faced with the reality of an Obama nomination, the delegates and SDs would realize the error of their ways and start coming over to her side.

Other than that little piece of baseless conjecture, I've admittedly got nuthin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Perhaps there is no difference between deluded to the point of absurdity and...
living in a campaign bubble. Its just amazing that they thought they were making a well-informed decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Jonathan Alter on MSNBC just said that the Clinton's didn't understand
how little support she had in Congress and that her anger was clouding her judgment. Said he was told this by a Clinton supporter. No link, but on Olbermann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because it worked so well for Edwards?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breakaleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bad decision making all around. It doesn't exactly inspire confidence in her does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC