Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So who are the "we"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:54 PM
Original message
So who are the "we"?
As in "our time has come?"

In 1992, after Pat Buchanan declared a "culture war," some of us were discussing the elections and someone commented: The Republican party wants white, protestant males. I am a white Jewish woman, and thus do not meet two of the three "requirements."

I was reminded of that comment when I've observed Obama saying again and again: "our time has come." "Now it is our turn."

Is he talking about African Americans? About non-boomers?

During the campaign both he and Michelle trashed the Bill Clinton presidency. Obama praised Reagan while denigrated the baby boomers "the bad 60s." (Never mind that the 60s gave us the Civil Rights movement). One of his adoring fans - Newsweek's Jonathan Alter - came out about how all his life he felt like a "step generation" - being born in the mid 50s, saying that the baby boomers did not contribute anything to our society (I had a discussion about this early in the year).

Thus, for those of us who were born shortly after the end of WWII, who still are grateful for Bill Clinton - who turned a deficit into surplus, who reigned over an economic expansion across all income levels, who nominated two Supreme Court Justices that makes talking about taking back the Supreme Court even a possibility - are we still part of the Democratic Party? Is Obama caring about us? Or are we going to be the biggest drag on the economy with our pending demand on Social Security and Medicare, our pending withdrawal of million of dollars from our IRAs and 401Ks?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. He means Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's American's time now? Whose time was it before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nice subtle slap in the face to Obama supporters in your sig line.
Are you never going to stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. The sig line is honoring all the people who see Obama as an Overlight teacher.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/06/06/notes060608.DTL

"...Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. Riiiiiight. No snarkyness from you at all.
You've had an epiphany. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. July 11, 2008 Noon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenmaster Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. A select few who profit from the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Republicans.
Sorry, your time is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Clearly it was England's
It's time we replaced Greenwich Mean Time with the kinder and gentler Central Time. The times demand it!!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. If you think America has been run by the people, then you are very much mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. It was corporate profits before........remember?
doh! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsomuah Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Political insiders, lobbyists, and the corporations that pay for them
Corporate America practically handpicked the last two supreme court nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Corporations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. sure as hell wasn't mine (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
59. The fascists
evidently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Nope.
Unless you've just defined all those opposed to Obama to be non-Americans.

* is American. Saying that "his time has come" if Obama wins has an ominous ring to it.

Most US corporations have Americans at their helm and as their Board. When Obama wins, will it be there time, finally?

See the problem?

So we can rule out "Americans", or at least "all Americans". He undoubtedly means "some Americans", but then we're back to the question--what subset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about people instead of corporations??
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 02:56 PM by cliffordu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hear that Obama is going to turn Baby Boomers into fertilizer
It's part of his New Green Economy. Good thing I'm a Gen Xer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. cool. we deserve it. Complete fuck-ups as a generation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Speak for yourself......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
52. Name one way we have left this world a better place....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Ending conscription in the U.S.
Since you asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. The citizen soldier....hmm...
we will have to disagree.

Everyone should serve. Everyone.

A tour of duty for every able bodied young adult- If you cannot stand the military, then a stint in the conservation corps, the peace corps or 'invest in your country corps...." but EVERYONE should invest a little of themselves in this country and world.

It would make everyone a little more empathetic with others.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. "A tour of duty for every able bodied young adult- If you cannot stand the military, then a stint "
in the conservation corps, the peace corps or 'invest in your country corps...." but EVERYONE should invest a little of themselves in this country and world."

There's quite a bit of difference in investing oneself by going to war versus Peace Corps, don't you think? Yes, there are lots of ways to get involved without committing murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. That's right, there are many ways to serve....
I just think it should be a right of passage. And everyone should share that right.

Could be we'd be a better nation for it.


I did my service. Did you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. "I did my service. Did you?"
What exactly did you do? I come from a long history of military service where the MEN served in wartime. We have tintypes (sp) of my husband's great-great grandfather in his civil war uniform, and his great-great grandfather on the other side of his family was murdered for refusing to participate in the Klan. Our fathers served in WWII. Most recently my husband was in the Marines, and our younger son was 82nd Airborne. Me? I have been an activist since the 60s, and currently my focus is GOTV. Also, my husband and I are a 2-person disaster response team locally and respond to local disasters which are usually house fires. We work at the local homeless shelter, and have delivered Meals on Wheels until employment out of town ended that. I went with the Red Cross to the Gulf after Katrina struck and interviewed victims in order to issue vouchers; did damage assessment, and combed the more rural areas to see that people who were due assistance were seeking assistance and if not, interviewed and issued vouchers on the spot. I'm working locally to ensure that we have democratic representatives at each precinct in November, and that all the rules and regs are being followed to ensure that the ratio of voting booths to # of registered voters in each precinct is being met, and that the layout of the precinct--according to state guidelines that I obtained from the State Board of Election--ensures voting in secrecy. IMHO, I serve my country, but more on a local, personal level.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. We left it a better place by refusing to drink the Kool Aid that past generations had!
Our generation questioned authority, and I am PROUD to have been part of that generation that refused to drink the Koo-lAid and questioned authority. Does "the emperor has no clothes" resonate? The turmoil or revolution of the 60s was necessary to move our country forward! I saw the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. Did you know that these basic rights were not even legislated until the 60s?

Is your question even serious? Do you even remember the 60s or did you only ready about it? Are you a millennial raised by a boomer, by chance? I saw the assassinations of President Kennedy, Malcolm X, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., to name a few, and with them, hopes and dreams for a better society, a more equal society. I watched the draft send friends to VietNam, never to return. I watched on television as black students under armed guard attended previously all-white schools during desegregation. Peaceful demonstrators were not treated so peacefully during that time. On television I saw college peaceful protesters killed at Kent State. I saw innocent people killed because of the fight for civil rights. I live a few miles down the road from Greensboro where 4 black college students staged their sit-in at a previously "whites only" Woolworth's lunch counter. Can you even imagine growing up during a time when public water fountains, public restrooms, restaurants, etc., etc., had "white only" signs posted? Or grown black men being called "boy" by whites? Or, their not being "allowed" to sit at the front of a bus, rather being relegated to the rear? My generation realized that all people were not treated equally, and that we all had and have a responsibility to see that they are--then as well as now. I'm tired of all the inequality and racism that still exists in this country, but not too tired to keep fighting against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #57
62. self delete
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 02:00 AM by cliffordu




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Some will be reserved for soylent green production.
Long live Gen Xers!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Soylent Green, anyone? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenmaster Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. "we" are everybody that is being ignored.
You are missing the point, if you are thinking of "we" in an exclusive way, rather than an inclusive way.

"We" refers to anybody that wants to have a say in government, wants things to change from the direction that "we" have let them go down over the past 7 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't see how we will be a drag on the economy
I've put into social security for 35 years, and I'm looking forward to my two cents worth. No doubt baby boomers have billions in IRA's and adding to them everyday. Said withdrawals will be good for the economy. I chuckle at the notion that boomers are bad or a drag. Why is it so terrible that we will be withdrawing from Social Security but it wasn't a problem when "we" have been adding to it for decades? And since there are so many of us haven't we contributed the most? But I digress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. You do realize that SS is not a fund?
There's no actual SS fund, there's nothing to "add to". So there's no such thing as "contributing the most". The drag is that there will be many more boomers drawing from SS than workers to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #47
64. Pay for what??
If there won't be enough "workers to pay for it" now does it not compute that there were more workers "baby boomers" paying for "it" in the past when there were less people "dragging?"

If there is no "contributing the most" then how could there possibly be not enough workers to contribute now?

Once again why the "drag" since those doing the dragging have been "contributing" the most? And if there is no fund how could there possibly be a drag?

There is not a fund? Pray tell what was that item on my pay stub for all these years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. so many questions
Do you have to question everything?

Why don't you question the Clinton administration?

"Our time has come" was the repeated refrain from Jesse Jackson's speech in 1984. You claim to be old enough to remember that. In that speech Jesse mentioned many groups (which I cannot remember clearly, although there is a link to the speech in my journal, where so many other answers can be found :o :eyes:) but it was basically the poor, the working class, and social outcasts. You know, the people who are usually excluded from the Reindeer games :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:02 PM
Original message
People more interested in a functioning government...
...than scoring points on either side of the Culture Wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where did he say it is "our turn"?
link please

It is our time--meaning--time for the republicans to take note that they can no longer pillage the "kitty" and strip hard-working Americans of their right to have equal health care and job opportunities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Symarip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. "We" meaning...
"Only those who believe in Raptor Jesus".

It's so obvious in the way Obama speaks. He's obviously making reference to those who are bles-sed enough to have been touched by His magnificient talon.



HAIL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Gotta love the Sacred Heart of Raptor Jesus! lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Symarip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Raptor Jesus is all knowing and powerful.
He is love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Love
and big sharp pointy teeth. lol :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Less than two days left...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Me and a guy named Doug.
The rest of you are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. He Means the working people of America who are getting a bad deal
He means all Americans; time for the people to take back our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. I remember the gas crisis of the 70's
Jimmy Carter warned us that our dependence on oil was a threat to national security. The speed limit was lowered and we had odd and even numbered days when we could buy gas. Japanese cars began to take over the market and the auto indutry took a hit that it has never fully recovered from. Jimmy Carter stressed conservation and recyling. He had solar panels installed on the White House roof. What happened? When Reagan took office he had the panels removed and people no longer talked about alternative fuels. Through the subsequent Presidencies no one made this a major issue. We are forced to do it now.

I am one of those who is disgusted with this govt. for letting this problem fester for 30 years. Everyone(including Bill) ignored this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Did Reagan really do this? I did not know
but then, I do remember members of his administration, especially James Watt who, it appeared, were going out of their way to reverse every single New Deal achievement, just for the sake of reversing it. Thus, it would not surprise me that he took the solar panels out. Why couldn't they have stayed? It was not costing anything by then?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Yes, Reagan did this
The Repubs have been trying to reverse the achievements of the New Deal ever since Reagan. I wish they could have let them stay also.

This is a link to a Press Release from Jimmy Carter:
http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.org/newsreleases/2007/07-18.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. I got your "amen" right here...
If Jimmy Carter were not quite so pious, I'm sure he be thinking, "Fucking assholes! I WARNED them that this was going to happen, but did they listen? NOOOOO!"

Thirty years of malign neglect on energy issues, and we're quite literally paying the price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. So true
The next person in the White House who seemed to show an interest was Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, at least you admit that it was about restoring Bill for you, and NOT about Hillary....
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Several of the Hillary supporters I know personally
gave me that as their reason for voting for her: they liked Bill and figured with Hillary as president, he would be the one really calling the shots.

Disclaimer: This is an anecdote based upon my limited personal experience. It is not meant to describe Hillary supporters in general. This opinion is not necessarily shared by the management or membership of DU. Your mileage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. No, this was an added bonus
She was not my first choice but once I started hearing her at the debates, I was impressed with her precise responses, to the point, while the men would waffle and waver and mug at the camera.

But this is me - left brain dominant who is persuaded by specifics rather than a vague concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. The context is clear: The people who want change in Washington

"Our time has come"

In *every* speech I've heard him say this, the context is *always* about the people who have been wanting a change in the way things are done in Washington.

This is perfectly clear, if you listen to what he's saying.

Geraldine Ferraro and a few others have taken out the words "Our time has come" and reprehensibly tried to assign other meaning to it.

He's not talking about black or white people, men or women. The message is change. It's pretty simple, and yet people keep either screwing it up as if it's complicated, or saying it's too simple and doesn't have enough specifics, as if they're hopelessly incapable of going to his website and reading the specifics behind the change he's talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Me, for one.
You too, if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. The "we" not referenced by, "Venezuela is our enemy".

If Venezuela (or any third world country) introduces New Deal policies then their wages go up which means less competition to bring down our wages. It also creates more consumers for American products which creates more US jobs and more US profits.

Obama's "we" are the 99% of Americans who benefit from New Deal policies in Latin America.

Bush's "we" are the 1% of Americans hurt by those policies. That would be the people already invested heavily in the status quo. The people exporting food *from* Venezuela while the people were starving *in* Venezuela because the 1%ers could make more money selling that food in Europe and the United States.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. No he's not talking about you...
I have on good authority (Fox News) that he's talking about only African American males. Jimmy Walker is going to be the Secretary of Defense. So you and your Jewish lady friends will just have to suffer...

:sarcasm:

Two more days and the "Concern Trolls" get the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenmaster Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Dyn-O-mite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. the 1.5 million people who donated to his campaign, vs the 1500 lobbyists
who donate to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. The people who haven't donated are SOL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. No they will benefit from the selflessness of those who donated as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. We, the non-"triangulated" members of the Democratic Party.
The Clintons gave us pandering to the right as a strategy.

They gave us "welfare reform" as part of that pandering.

They gave us Nafta.

They gave us a foreign policy that prevented the UN from moving into Rwanda during the genocide.

They gave us George W. Bush.

They gave us a vote for war.

They gave us the ideal of winning at any price.

They gave us "respectable" racism under the banner of the "White working class".

They gave us shit and told us it smelled like roses.

I'm white, male, 64 years old who marched for civil rights in the '60s. Marched, and voted, for peace in the '60s. And, I wouldn't vote for a Clinton for head garbage collector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. I am "we." You are "they."
Wednesday can't come soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. I think it's every person in America besides just you.
Wouldn't that be odd? It's everyone's time, except one lonely internet poster going by the handle "question everything".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
50. "Oui" - He was speaking French, n'est ce pas?
Well, if he winked when he said "we" then I say we could reasonably conclude that it was a secret message to the space aliens he has already conspired with to take over after his election and turn us all into forced laborers for Martian green cheese production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffrey_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
51. "Obama praised Reagan"
Seriously, you are still twisting his words?

If not, then show me the exact quote where he praised Reagan.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
63. He means elitist terrorist blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC