Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain trending downward in swing states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:52 PM
Original message
McCain trending downward in swing states
according to the latest stuff at RealClearPolitics.com

McCain is trending downward in Florida, Ohio, Michigan, Viriginia, North Carolina, Mississipi, New Mexico.

Michigan had been looking like a bright spot for McCain given the Primary shenanigans there, but MI is now moving towards Obama.

Perhaps the biggest symbolic problem for the GOP is Mississippi, McCain has lost substantial ground over the last two months. Mississippi is the heart of the South and should be absolutely safe for him, though McCain holds only a modest lead of 6 points, if he's forced to campaign there between now and NOV the moral defeat for the GOP would be obvious. Everyone is going to say I am crazy to think there's a shot at Mississippi and that we should focus on Viriginia, North Carolina, New Mexico and Colorado, Nevada -but I say the spread in Nevada is about the same as in Mississippi, both are in our reach to at least make really competitive.

Everyone expects Obama to campaign in Nevada, no one expects Mississippi, if he did you know the news will be all over it and there actually will be a few conservative leaning independents around the country who might just find the brogadacio of it all, taking the fight right into the lions den, absolutely irresistible.

that coupled with intense voter registration may not put Mississippi or Nevada in Obama's column but may just give us a few more seats in the House, but more importantly force the GOP to waste their precious money in states that should have been safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. We got 5 months
Make a day jaunt through Mississippi and see if it moves the polls. If it does go again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really think that a candidate should..
.. campaign in every state.

Otherwise, people have a way of feeling slighted
or left out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama needs to make an appearance in every state
Even if he concentrates more on the swing states, having him show up at least once in each state would really send a positive message. There are more states in play this year than most people think. The 50-state strategy is working wonderfully. Thank you, Dr. Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nevada is ripe for picking
There is a huge libertarian wing in among Rethugs, and they hate McSame, and will likely vote for Barr. Meanwhile, the independent vote is going to swing for Obama big time. Lots of first time Hispanic voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. so much for the "but he can't win the swing states" meme
from a few weeks back....

Another meme bites the dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm curious about the next poll out of Florida.
The only recent polls were from before the committee met to seat the Florida delegation and Clinton conceded. The polls that used "likely voters" were showing a low double digit gap while the polls that used "registered voters" were showing a low single digit gap. I'm curious as to what kind of bump he gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC