grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:07 PM
Original message |
Rove strategy: talk about VIETNAM instead of IRAQ |
|
Despite the masterful moves of the Kerry campaign today, the larger issue remains. The headlines are about Vietnam. Iraq (Bush's blunder) is largely ignored.
Rove wins for now.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I agree. Hopefully Kerry's camp will get the Iraq topic back on track |
|
soon.
They appear to have run a fine campaign so far, so I don't think they're idiots. Keeping fingers crossed.
Iraq invasion is the most important reason to oust Bush and our most potent argument against him.
|
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Iraq has been somewhat problematic for Kerry. People started going nuts over his last statement.
IMO, Kerry still needs to do a better job in SUCCINCTLY explaining his vote. His promise of involving other nations may not be enough as well.
Otherwise I think your right. Rove and the media have shifted focus away from Iraq even as the fighting has increased in the last several weeks.
|
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Exactly. And focus on Kerry's role in Vietnam in quick rapid succession |
|
to avoid any questioning of Bush's. That is the big freaking story here! Where the hell was Bush? I cannot believe that he isn't being questioned about his discharge status and lack of records to prove he wasn't awol.
|
LoisMustDie
(55 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
you gotta admit that Vietnam is in the NOW.. Iraq.. well that's old news and that horse has been beaten to death. Vietnam.. We need answers.. we need to know more about that war.. We can't just sweep it under the carpet.. And really.. who knows more about vietnam then rove.. Kerry.... nah.. I'm sure next week Rove will break the story that Kerry wasn't actually ever in vietnam...
|
restorefreedom
(424 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Don't bother talking about the latest fucking disaster.
Better to character assinate from 30 years ago.
|
jimshoes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Not for long though... |
|
Matthews had David Gergen on talking about that very thing. Said that the pubs have blundered badly by trying to force the focus on to Viet Nam and should have instead been talking about current issues. Re: quagmire in Iraq.
|
Poiuyt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Did Gergan mean that Bush should be talking about Iraq? That doesn't seem right.
|
jimshoes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. I'm paraphrasing but that was what it sounded like |
|
he was saying. Please watch the replay or check out the transcript to be sure. He seemed a bit off his normal demeanor though.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. He did say the focus on Vietnam is a losing issue for the Chimp |
|
He said this is Kerry's strength, not his weakness, and he thinks Republicans will lose on this particular battle.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...that Rove is smoking a big cigar tonight. Probably will have a big steak and a bottle wine, too.
Every day they don't talk about Iraq is a good day for George!!
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
7. But people haven't forgotten Iraq |
|
just because it's not in the news. Also, I love how Kerry talked about "our" service in Vietnam in his speech, meaning him AND Bush. That was intentional.
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
8. As if the obvious paralells between the two don't hurt Bush? |
|
If that's Rove's plan, he's not as bright as we give him credit for.
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. He's relying on voters' stupidity. nt |
restorefreedom
(424 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Matthews asked Cleland |
|
why the hell aren't we talking about the hundreds dead and thousands of amputees.
HOW is this f-ing regime getting away with this?
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. What was great was how Max kept taking it back to Bush* |
|
He made the connection over and over again. This is Bush's technique.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. Yeah, you beat me to it |
|
In fact, the last thing that Rove wants to do is pretend that Vietnam is still relevant to today's issues, and not just becuse Bush has so little to be personally proud of. The more anyone puts Vietnam next to Iraq, the worse it is for Bush
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The larger issue of Vietnam is the larger issue today: what wars should be fought, who should fight them, and what one should do when it is clear the president has made the wrong decision. That's what is going on. You can't talk about a disasterous quagmire of a war with Kerry fighting and saving lives and Bush staying home without making points on today's issues.
The concept that Rove would be satisfied by a focus on Vietnam is silly.
|
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Every democrat in the country needs to include in every public statement |
|
something to the effect that it is easy to understand why Bush and the republican party want to talk about a war that ended 30 years ago rather than the war that is going on right now. If the media asks a Congressman about the price of oil, the Congressman needs to mention that all Bush and the republicans want to focus on is a war that ended 30 years ago. If the local media asks a Congressman about a local issue, the Congressman needs to mention that all Bush and the republicans want to focus on is a war that ended 30 years ago. The democrats also need to get friendly pundits to hammer on this.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. This is well stated. You should send it to the Kerry camp. n/t |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-19-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Matthews made that point with Max Cleland. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |