Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove strategy: talk about VIETNAM instead of IRAQ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:07 PM
Original message
Rove strategy: talk about VIETNAM instead of IRAQ
Despite the masterful moves of the Kerry campaign today, the larger issue remains. The headlines are about Vietnam. Iraq (Bush's blunder) is largely ignored.

Rove wins for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. Hopefully Kerry's camp will get the Iraq topic back on track
soon.

They appear to have run a fine campaign so far, so I don't think they're idiots. Keeping fingers crossed.

Iraq invasion is the most important reason to oust Bush and our most potent argument against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Unfortunately
Iraq has been somewhat problematic for Kerry. People started going nuts over his last statement.

IMO, Kerry still needs to do a better job in SUCCINCTLY explaining his vote. His promise of involving other nations may not be enough as well.

Otherwise I think your right. Rove and the media have shifted focus away from Iraq even as the fighting has increased in the last several weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly. And focus on Kerry's role in Vietnam in quick rapid succession
to avoid any questioning of Bush's. That is the big freaking story here! Where the hell was Bush? I cannot believe that he isn't being questioned about his discharge status and lack of records to prove he wasn't awol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoisMustDie Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah but
you gotta admit that Vietnam is in the NOW.. Iraq.. well that's old news and that horse has been beaten to death. Vietnam.. We need answers.. we need to know more about that war.. We can't just sweep it under the carpet.. And really.. who knows more about vietnam then rove.. Kerry.... nah.. I'm sure next week Rove will break the story that Kerry wasn't actually ever in vietnam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
restorefreedom Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. yup
Don't bother talking about the latest fucking disaster.

Better to character assinate from 30 years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not for long though...
Matthews had David Gergen on talking about that very thing. Said that the pubs have blundered badly by trying to force the focus on to Viet Nam and should have instead been talking about current issues. Re: quagmire in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Gergan said that?
Did Gergan mean that Bush should be talking about Iraq? That doesn't seem right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I'm paraphrasing but that was what it sounded like
he was saying. Please watch the replay or check out the transcript to be sure. He seemed a bit off his normal demeanor though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. He did say the focus on Vietnam is a losing issue for the Chimp
He said this is Kerry's strength, not his weakness, and he thinks Republicans will lose on this particular battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I suspect....
...that Rove is smoking a big cigar tonight. Probably will have a big steak and a bottle wine, too.

Every day they don't talk about Iraq is a good day for George!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. But people haven't forgotten Iraq
just because it's not in the news. Also, I love how Kerry talked about "our" service in Vietnam in his speech, meaning him AND Bush. That was intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. As if the obvious paralells between the two don't hurt Bush?

If that's Rove's plan, he's not as bright as we give him credit for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. He's relying on voters' stupidity. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
restorefreedom Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Matthews asked Cleland
why the hell aren't we talking about the hundreds dead and thousands of amputees.

HOW is this f-ing regime getting away with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What was great was how Max kept taking it back to Bush*
He made the connection over and over again. This is Bush's technique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yeah, you beat me to it
In fact, the last thing that Rove wants to do is pretend that Vietnam is still relevant to today's issues, and not just becuse Bush has so little to be personally proud of. The more anyone puts Vietnam next to Iraq, the worse it is for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, it IS about Iraq
The larger issue of Vietnam is the larger issue today: what wars should be fought, who should fight them, and what one should do when it is clear the president has made the wrong decision. That's what is going on. You can't talk about a disasterous quagmire of a war with Kerry fighting and saving lives and Bush staying home without making points on today's issues.

The concept that Rove would be satisfied by a focus on Vietnam is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Every democrat in the country needs to include in every public statement
something to the effect that it is easy to understand why Bush and the republican party want to talk about a war that ended 30 years ago rather than the war that is going on right now. If the media asks a Congressman about the price of oil, the Congressman needs to mention that all Bush and the republicans want to focus on is a war that ended 30 years ago. If the local media asks a Congressman about a local issue, the Congressman needs to mention that all Bush and the republicans want to focus on is a war that ended 30 years ago. The democrats also need to get friendly pundits to hammer on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. This is well stated. You should send it to the Kerry camp. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. Matthews made that point with Max Cleland.
I was astonished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC