Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many Presidents have lied us into war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:31 PM
Original message
How many Presidents have lied us into war?
One that comes to mind is James K. Polk who made up all kinds of shit to provoke the Mexican American War so we could control the ports in California. I am willing to bet there are several others.

What other presidents have pulled similar crap? At least Polk pulled off his plan. We can't say that much for Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lyndon Johnson did...
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 05:37 PM by loveable liberal
He fell for the same crap only instead of "terrorist" it was "communist" threat. So did Reagan, although Grenada was just an invasion; also Nicaragua was probably an undeclared war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would agree with that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. I will also agree with that.
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 08:02 PM by rebel with a cause
did a whole study with part of it being on his lying to take us into D.R. in 1965, which we used as training for the Vietnam war. Too many people have died needlessly for the power this country holds over other countries. JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. And add Kennedy then
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lots of 'em
Vietnam was based on lies - depends on who you want to blame. Started under eisenhower, but the big lies came under Johnson.

Grenada was a lie. Panama was a lie. All but a handful of our wars were unnecessary and based on lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So here is the list so far. Eisenhower, Johnson, Polk, Bush I, Bush II, Reagan

I am getting the feeling this list is going to be very long very quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Bush 1?
What lies did he tell?

Did Iraq not really invade Kuwait?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. do a little reading. it's a tad more complicated than that
you can do it, I know you can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Panama
Norriega was a drug smuggling thug but he was a CIA installed thug who went rougue...kind of like Sadam..and Bin Laden.

There are lots of thugs in the world...we tend to focus on the ones we install who go against our wishes after they are installed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. A little help for you.
From what I have read,1) Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq and that is what started their problem. 2) The land Iraq took was taken from them earlier by Kuwait perhaps, not sure of this one. 3) There were lies told about the raping of women and other such things to incite the citizens of the good old USA. False (female) witness brought in by USA government to tell these stories and to cry on MSM. Just a few of the things we were not told until a lot later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. Google search terms for you: Iraq "April Glaspie" (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
53. The BS about the incubator babies, the risk to his buddies the Saudis, etc.
Jesus, I was in grade school and I know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
72. two words......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
55. the primary reasons for going to war with iraq at that time were TRUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson also...
Most of them have lied, I would suppose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Wilson - The War to End All Wars
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 07:02 PM by tomg
until the next one. Well, at least Wilson wasn't a blatantly racist shit. Oh, I forgot. He was.

edited to ad: Wilson as shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. McKinley (sort of)
The Spanish American War was based on the lie that the Spanish blew up the USS Maine.
McKinley was against war, but Hearst whipped up the public with his endless lies in his newspapers that Congress authorized force against Spain, which McKinley reluctantly signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. McKinley sounds like the Democratic congress.
Good people with no backbones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Actually he did his duty constitutionally
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 05:56 PM by Jake3463
Congress declares war President is required to abide by that decision or resign.

Congress relinquished their power and duty to Bush.

There hasn't been a legal war since WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Good Point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Hearst was the Rupert Murdoch of his time, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
52. Indeed he was
It's also interesting to note that Rove's political idol is Mark Hanna, the Republican millionaire who managed McKinley's campaign.

Hearst = Murdoch
Hanna = Rove
Cuba, Phillipines = Iraq

Perhaps a new abbreviation is in order?
SSDC, Same shit, different century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
54. Essentially true
The USS Maine had a smoldering fire lasting several days in her coal bunker, which was located next to ammo bunker. The general conclusion now is that the fire touched off the ammunition. William Randolph Hearst had been pushing for war for several months, he used the Maine as a propaganda tool to whip the country into war fever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. how many wars have we had? Even the really necessary ones like
WWII requires some subterfuge. If the population really knew the total horror involved we would probably just become an isolationist country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If you look at history
We've actually been actively fighting somebody since 1776

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wars

Very few points in our history where we weren't actively shooting someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. American Wars

Closest things to Just Wars.

Revolutionary War - Brittish Deserved it
War of 1812 - Britts agains causing trouble
Barbary Wars - They declared war on us
Civil War - Was going to happen sooner or later
WWII - No explanation needed unless your Pat Buchanan
Korean War - UN action
Operation Desert Storm - I know people may disagree but Sadam did invade Kuwait and it was an international coaltion
Kosovo - Some disagreement
Afghanistan 2002

Kind of Based on Lies but some truth
WWI - Complex, everyone was totally wrong in some way.

Based totally on Lies
Spanish American War
Vietnam
Mexican/American War
All Indian Wars
Current Iraq War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thats a good summary. Thanks for putting that together.

It would be interesting to see a list of every war in history that was started on a lie. I bet the list is a mile long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well, there is some debate over
the War of 1812. Otherwise, pretty fair assessment ( of course, I am one of the "some disagreement" foks).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I agree some debate
However they kept stealing our Merchant ships and making slaves of our civilian soldiers.

Our desire to annex Canada however had a great deal to do with the decision as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yeah, and we thought we'd beat them without much effort
They fucked us up pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. We always think we are invincible
after a win. Its a proud American tradition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. If it weren't for the Battle of New Orleans
we would have really had our asses kicked. And that one was after the war was over, so it doesn't count. We should have t-shirst made about the War of 1812 that read "My Government Had the War of 1812, and All I got was a Crappy National Anthem No One Can Sing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. We also wouldn't have had Andrew Jackson
unless the country was really voting for genocide alone that year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
57. and we'd have never had Jackson_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
67. Good point
If we could just go back in time....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Maybe we could change the national anthem then
To one that celebrates that battle. And is slightly less violent than the other one.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4Q47i4zGBs

Too bad Hendrix never played that one at Woodstock :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. That has to be from the Tennessee Ernie
Ford Show. Awesome. Oh, as to the current National Anthem - we stole the tune from a British drinking song called "To Anacreon in Heaven."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. don't forget all the ''little'' wars, the Grenadas, the Panamas, the
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 07:04 PM by Gabi Hayes
Nicaraguas (mining their harbor is considered an act of war), the Guatemalas, the Irans (Mossadegh, anyone?), the Chiles, etc., etc.

there have been more than a hundred instances where we've bombed, supported insurgencies, overthrown elected leaders (Chavez), subverted elections

there have been lots of threads linking sites that have complete lists, and it's surprising, really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. In our history
There really are very few years where our government wasn't shooting at someone for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
56. Hold up. the barbary coast pirates declared war on us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
61. Every war is based on lies...
...though perhaps not entirely or even primarily, and perhaps not on all sides.

A ruling class whips up the commoners into a frenzy, sometimes with justification, in order to perpetuate or enrich itself. We remember the Maine, the Alamo, and Pearl Harbor, often just the way They want us to, and we go kill and die for the very rich.

Occasionally there is good reason to take up arms, but certain interested parties will lie anyway, just to make sure as many of us as possible are persuaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Spanish-American War
McKinley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Grenada and Vietnam come to mind
Although actually, I'm not sure Vietnam counts on the grounds that I think Eisenhower's administration genuinely believed that the area would go communist if it wasn't stopped in Vietnam. OK, they were completely wrong but it has to be a deliberate deception to be a lie. Johnson certainly lied his ass off to esculate that war though. Grenada was just manufactured whole cloth. The current Iraq war obviously (Personally, I think Afghanistan was justified but your mileage may vary).

You could make an arguement for 1812 which was largely our fault (the English) but the US wasn't entirely blameless. Kosovo is open to question. The first Gulf War (Desert Storm) was justified but the causes were heavily edited for public consumption (Hussein invaded due to a dispute about oil rights on the Iraq/Kuwait border).

I think that covers all the actual wars with dubious intent but there's about 80 "executive actions" of questionable morality which the public wasn't informed about at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Really shouldnt count Viet Nam as Ikes,
When he left office in 1960 there were 300 American advisors in Vietnam. By Dec 1963 the number was up to 16,000. After the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, the numbers went of like a Saturn V rocket. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Point
Technically though, Ike was the one who got involved with Vietnam. We can't take if from the declaration of war since there wasn't one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. True
However we had "advisors" in half the developing world under Ike conducting training for governments we liked. We still do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #25
58. Actually we had military advisors
in Vietnam since the end of WWII. We provided the French with technical assistance from 1948 on. This assistance was in assembly, maintenance and operation of Amercian equipment such as tanks and aircraft provided to them by Truman. Once the French they withdrew, we continued supporting the South Vietnames. At the end of Ike's term, the number of advisors in Vietnam was around 300.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. Kennedy was pulling our advisors out when he was
assassinated. Within two weeks of his death, Johnson had rescended Kennedy's order for pull out and upped the amount of advisors there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #46
59. It was Kennedy that raised the number of advisors
from 300 in 1960 to 16,000 in 1963. He was discussing withdrawel after the 1964 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Laser Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Then there's Reagan and Grenada...
...to distract attention from the Marine barracks in Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. Do they have to be liars, or can they
be incompetent idiots whose incompetence ( to put it kindly) made a war much worse? If so, I hereby nominate James Buchanan - often referred to by American historians as the 2nd worst president. Our own George Bush, of course, claims top honors in that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Poor Pennsylvania
Such a great state and the only President we had was that guy.

Could be worse we could be TX responsible for the war criminal Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. New amendment.
No more presidents from Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Don't think its going to be a problem
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 08:01 PM by Jake3463
for a long time.

Anne Richards would have made a fine President and they produced Molly Ivens.

No more male Presidents from Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. I have been saying that for seven years.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. If you count military advertures as war, then all 43 of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #37
62. Facile AND wrong. Amazing. Yeah, Lincoln "lied" us into the Civil War.
Carter "lied" us into...?

Yes, the OP's operative word is "lied".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. I guess you forgot "Desert One"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. FDR with Pearl HArbor.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. The old fascist slander of FDR.
Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
66. see my response to the poster underneath nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Vague indications that an attack by Japan might be being planned.
It does not equal hard facts which would prompt decisive actions by the President. Because of Japan's actions in Manchuria, we had joined the allies in observing economic sanctions against them. This is an act of war. They were bound to retaliate in some way, either at Subic bay or Midway or Pearl Harbor.

The question: did FDR know enough to start a war over?

Everyone has 20/20 hindsight, but we really will never know. What we DO know is if FDR had attempted to launch a military action against a nation that had not overtly threatened us, then his enemies - the very same people who use this slander to attack him - would have tried everything to impeach him. And they might have succeeded.

The fact is the RW has used this lie to impugn the legacy of a great President for almost 70 yrs. They don't need help spreading their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. is it so hard to believe that a president who made one of the greatest overhauls
of the role of government in the history of America (and i am not saying that it was a bad thing, FDR is one of my favorite presidents), would act on a moral imperative for what he believed to be the greater good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
60. That we were attacked is hardly a "lie". BTW~~~I hope you remember to refuse your Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. That he was pre-warned is hardly a "lie" either.
He did a lot of good things, and he felt like he was acting on a moral imperative, because he believed the only way the axis could be defeated was with american help, but american sentiment was strongly anti-war before the attack on pearl harbor.

The USA intercepted dozens of coded japanese messages that they decoded, an example of which is right here :
"“...the task force, keeping its movements strictly secret and maintaining close guard against submarines and aircraft, shall advance into Hawaiian waters, and upon the very opening of hostilities shall attack the main force of the United States fleet in Hawaii and deal it a mortal blow...""

so yeah


heres a link

http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=408

just because i think FDR was a good president doesn't mean that he never acted on morally shady grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. Bush Sr lied about "incubators" the 1st time around in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
45. Ray - Gun lied about Panama , Nicaragua ie "Iran Contra"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. And Ollie North made a career out of it.
I followed the hearings closely back then.

I never dreamed that he'd parlay his misdeeds into a career in "journalism"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. Every 21st Century war is still being fought.
Because what good are short wars to warmakers and their corporate support base, hmmm?

21st Century:

War on Terrorism, 2001 - present
Operation Enduring Freedom - Afghanistan 2001 - present
Operation Enduring Freedom - Philippines 2002 - present
Operation Iraqi Freedom - Horn of Africa 2002 - present
Operation Iraqi Freedom, 2003 - present
Waziristan War, 2004 - present
War in Somalia, 2006 - present
Operation Iraqi Freedom - Trans Sahara 2007 - present

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wars

***Let's just throw in that never ending "war on drugs"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #47
63. Oddly enough, this is only one President (remembering the OP).
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 07:23 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
69. Fuck this. Nobody lied like Bush & nobody deserves prison like Bush....PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
71. andrew jackson with his indian wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC