Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats should attack McCain on his perceived "strength"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:25 PM
Original message
Democrats should attack McCain on his perceived "strength"...
And that would be in the area of national security. That is the only major area that McCain leads Obama in the polls. Most people believe McCain would do a better job of protecting our country than Obama, much due to the fact that the media consistently pushes that idea.

However, in this area, the Democrats should take the advice of Karl Rove and attack your opponents perceived strengths, much like the Repubs attacked John Kerry's war record in 2004. We should learn from our mistakes.

Wesley Clark has been out in front in making the point that John McCain does not have the experience to be Commander in Chief. Simply being a former POW does not add up to "experience". It is about judgement and communication skills. John McCain is severely lacking in both areas. He was one of the biggest cheerleaders for the war in the first place but now wants credit for being one of the first to support the "surge", which has not yet worked - although violence has subsided.

And the reason violence has subsided is because Bush & Co decided to not only talk with the enemy but to negotiate with them also. That is what they did with the Sunnis in the Anbar Province. They talked with the enemy. At the same time, John McCain accuses Barack Obama of wanting to "negotiate with our enemies"? John McCain would like to have his cake and eat it too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I certain agree with this approach!
Yes, I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wes Clark is doing that
He said that getting shot down and being a POW, although heroic, does not make one qualified in foreign policy.

I think there were about 800 POWs in Vietnam. Given John McCain's standards, they would all have extensive foreign policy experience.

It's a Rovian tactic that worked so well against Kerry. Attack on the perceived strength. It's a very very fine line to do with McCain because people find his POW story pretty compelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And Clark never breaks a sweat while pointing out the obvious facts about McCain
It was great to see him on FTN today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wes Clark does a great job at framing this issue...
If the Repubs want to continue their personal attacks, I would suggest this might be a good tactic to use against McCain as self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I Don't Even See How It Is Heroic
Sad yes, but not heroic. One might call him heroic if he'd resisted his torturers but didn't he give in? I don't blame him but that doesn't make him heroic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Honestly, I don't either
It's a horrible thing to have to go through. I suppose the one "heroic" thing he did was to refuse the release that was negotiated for him since it didn't include his fellow POWs.

But that still doesn't qualify as foreign policy experience.

People are wrongly imprisoned in this country for crimes they didn't commit. That doesn't amke them experts in domestic policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. All POW, officers refused to go home.
In favor of the enlisted men being released first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Bingo. Being wrongly imprisoned here doesn't make policy experts. Occasionally good lawyers, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
"And the reason violence has subsided" - - - - hundreds of miles of concrete barricades!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Go Wesley Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's starting to form in my mind........
...that the only way to give the "national security" blather a big knock on it's ass IS Wes Clark (and I really didn't think that much about it until recently). No one else could, in essence, say "big fucking deal..you got shot down..did you ever lead an army like me, pal? Go play with your medals and leave the generals in charge of war and the statesmen (which you know crap about) in charge of avoiding war". Seriously, who the else could say this without getting chewed up alive??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. YES WES
can!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Wes to McCain, "Did you ever win a war like I did?" and
"did you ever negotiate a Peace Treaty like I did, which is still holding after a decade?"



Didn't think so.

and see, I'm supporting Barack Obama because I trust his judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. We should remind the media that McCain lost 5 aircraft
and if his Dad was not an Admiral, anyone else would have been pulled from flying after the third crash at the least.

McCain III lost jet number one in 1958 when he plunged into Corpus Christi Bay while practicing landings. He was knocked unconscious by the impact coming to as the plane settled to the bottom.

McCain's second crash occurred while he was deployed in the Mediterranean. "Flying too low over the Iberian Peninsula," Timberg wrote, "he took out some power lines which led to a spate of newspaper stories in which he was predictably identified as the son of an admiral."

McCain's third crash three occurred when he was returning from flying a Navy trainer solo to Philadelphia for an Army-Navy football game.

Timberg reported that McCain radioed, "I've got a flameout" and went through standard relight procedures three times before ejecting at one thousand feet. McCain landed on a deserted beach moments before the plane slammed into a clump of trees.

McCain's fourth aircraft loss occurred July 29, 1967, soon after he was assigned to the USS Forrestal as an A-4 Skyhawk pilot. While seated in the cockpit of his aircraft waiting his turn for takeoff, an accidently fired rocket slammed into McCain's plane. He escaped from the burning aircraft, but the explosions that followed killed 134 sailors, destroyed at least 20 aircraft, and threatened to sink the ship.

McCain's fifth loss happened during his 23rd mission over North Vietnam on Oct. 26, 1967, when McCain's A-4 Skyhawk was shot down by a surface-to-air missile. McCain ejected from the plane breaking both arms and a leg in the process and subsequently parachuted into Truc Bach Lake near Hanoi.

Source http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_mccain_lost_five_u.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Agree with the others -- Clark is doing an exemplary job at this.
And Biden is covering the area explaining how McCain's strategies are just WRONG.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. If We Go At Foreign Policy, Then VP Choice Should Be From This List
Here is a list of VP candidates discussed in a prior thread ranking VP candidates based on their FP experience:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6422000&mesg_id=6422000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. What strenghts ...
"I ‘Don’t See How It Matters’ That I Don’t Know The Price Of Gas" --John McCain

"I disagree with what the majority of the American people want." --John McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chriswallace112 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't know guys...
The thing about attacking strengths is understanding if they are true strengths in the first place or not. Kerry's war record was tarnished from the beginning when he came back and gave a speech on how the military was targeting civilians and raping and pillaging. To those "supposed" red-blooded "patriots," who think that a lapel pin makes you a true American, Kerry was soft. Plain and simple. Not a strength,

On the other hand, McCain actually is respected by many for his war record. It's ingrained in the public consciousness and it's going to be hard to change this popular belief. On top of that... the guy can't raise his arms because he endured five years of torture. We can't beat up on a cripple!

I think that we should go after something that he can't hide... his instability. Guy's off the wall according to people who know him. We want an angry McCain with his finger on the red button?!? Watch at their first debate when Obama runs circles around McBush and gets him angry on a nationalized program... he'll be cooked... let's do a rope-a-dope on McBush.. get him real real real mad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I disagree.
I think they should go after his "issues" - not personal attacks against him - even though he is not practicing the same restraint against Obama??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. ABSOLUTELY!
:toast: And we need to remind voters which political party was primarily responsible for protecting murika on 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavlovs DiOgie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Exactly!
Obama needs more comments like Wes Clark made this morning - being shot down and a POW doesn't qualifiy you to lead the military. Surragates need to be drilling this talking point into the media all week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-01-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. kick
for a quick review. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC