Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Wes Clark and Obama are on top of what's going on right now; it's a coordinate effort"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:12 PM
Original message
Poll question: "Wes Clark and Obama are on top of what's going on right now; it's a coordinate effort"
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 05:13 PM by Katzenkavalier
"They are dominating the news and slamming McCain in the process". Do you agree with that assesment? That's what I believe it's going on... and you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obligatory "Other"
Clark is being aggressive, Obama is uncomfortable with the attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Did you see Clark on Face the Nation
He did not make a gaffe, he said exactly what he rehearsed with David Axelrod and other strategists beforehand. This is how you play the game. Surrogates attack, candidate distances himself from the attack. Bush certainly didn't praise the Swift Boat Liars in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It wasn't so much a gaffe, but the intensity in the attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It came off wrong but wasn't false in any way. I know some vets who I respect GREATLY but wouldn't..
...think they were qualified to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The idea is to make McCain to lose his temper and lash out at Obama
And for Obama to calmly respond, "well I never said that, General Clark did." This is how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I really think the Obama campaign is using this, I REALLY believed they used the MsM on Wright also
...to make sure people knew he wasn't a Muslim and only 11% of people now believe that vs. 26% of people believe the sun revolves around the Earth.

I've seen this before, it usually turns out to be a net positive for Obama...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Reverand Who?
Sorry it's been so long that I forgot about that whole thing.

:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yeap, I forgot about him till I heard a ring tone. The whole thing was a net positive for Obama IMHO
...and I think this issue will too.

Clark knew what he was saying, mater of fact...anyone in Obama's camp could've said what Clark said but a former 5 star said it.

This looks like a lil MsM manipulation to me....that's a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It was brilliant, IMHO; Clark has nothing to lose and he knows it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. RIGHT!!! There's NO WAY I'm going to believe Clark didn't know what he was saying or it was a gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. KKKarl Rove may not be quite the genius he's given credit for. but
our guys have taken some of his lessons and honed them to a sharp, brilliant weapon to be used against Rove & Co...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyshade Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama/Clark '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. No but I'm not mad at either Clark or Obama.
I think Clark stepped on the Obama camps message today but I'm certainly not made at Clark for saying what he did about McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm going to hope/assume it is option 1
Otherwise I'd just be really mad, and that's not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. YES THANK YOU!!
People do not get how this works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. You'd have to think like a Chicago Politician, word is they play rough. Now this is going to be a 50
...cycle news item and it's a legitimate statement.

I know a bunch of vets who I respect GREATLY but there in NO way qualified to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. I JUST made this same point on another board!!! The statement about McSame is VALID and TRUE and...
...there's no way swiftboaters would let Obama getting shot down and calling himself qualified for president be an issue.

Obama free message play

1. - Have expendable surrogate say something truthful but controversial
2. - Wait till MsM picks up on Obama surrogates TRUTHFUL and THOUGHT provoking remarks and they'll play their faux outrage card pas 8 news cycles
3. - Obama denounces expendable surrogate making the denouncement another 8 cycle news item.

What Clark said is true and news it's getting in freeperLund and the MsM is free!!!

Anyone else seeing what I see?

Thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. The cycle is dominated with "Does mccain's military service qaulify him for Pres?"
Of course the answer is no, many thousands of servicemen and women are not qualified. So the next logical question is, what makes him qualified. That is where you hear crickets. mclame has nothing. He has nothing but the respect of service, not any qualification or judgment to be commander in chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It gets the question out there and the MsM repeating it over faux outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. These two wonderful people are not naive to what the media
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 05:25 PM by FrenchieCat
is about. Not in a million years. And anyone underestimating either of these two men earns my ire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Have Wes Clark's statements raised doubts in the public's mind about McCain?
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 05:33 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
Clark merely proposed that war heroisim doesn't necessarily qualify someone to be an executive decision-maker. I think it probably has raised questions about McCain, particularly among independents. It goes to the very core of McCain's appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. RIGHT!! The question was raised by a 4 star general too. The question in and of itself is VALID...
...outside of the way it was said Clark wasn't far off the mark.

I know plenty of Nam vets who are progressive good people but I wouldn't vote for them to be prez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. And the "way it was said" was actually Schieffer's words
Clark just repeated them in making his point. From the transcript:

http://securingamerica.com/node/2993

Bob Schieffer: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down. I mean-

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be President.



They weren't Clark's words. They were Schieffer's words, which Clark repeated in his answer. We need to keep pointing this out whenever somebody goes off on what Clark said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. And we are talking about a 4 star war winning General
making the point.

That's deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Other, more concerned about the escalating talk against Iran
and that topic needs more attention IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. I only hope
that there are people on the various talk show panels that will defend and honestly analyze what Clark said.

My concern is that entire segments will be given solely to bashing Clark, not honestly evaluating the content of his words. Thisd needs to be more about McCain than about Clark. Until then, it's not going to make people take a serious look at McCain's 'experience.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think Clark and Obama have just played the media like a fiddle.
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 05:52 PM by Forkboy
Along with some people here on DU.

Coordinated or not, it gets a very interesting, anti-McCain point out there while Obama takes the high road. His campaign has been able to pull this off repeatedly due to the predictability of the media, so I think it may well indeed be coordinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. It pays to learn the ways of the enemy--Karl Rove has been unseated by a smarter, hungrier opponent.
It was bound to happen eventually.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyj999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. Clever................. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC