Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: concering Fisa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:59 PM
Original message
Question: concering Fisa
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 02:00 PM by butterfly77
if Obama would have voted the opposite way would if have mattered,would the bill have passed or not passed,from what I can see is that he did it so as not to have the Repugs saying he was soft on terrorism.

So I really don't see why this is such a big deal.Was his vote going to make it pass or not.Who were the others who voted for it and are they taking heat for it too.Tell me what is the difference.The only reason I can see why some are making a big deal is because he is the nominee..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. it doesn't matter whether it would have passed without his vote or not. he voted to
kill our fourth amendment rights, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. No.
The bill would still have passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. A vote against it would only have been symbolic.
There wasn't enough support to block it.

He did the right thing, but others feel he should have filibustered and given the right more ammunition to call him weak.

Just as Iran is testing missiles.

They miss the big picture, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. yes, here's me missing the big picture and hoping he would have stood
ON PRINCIPLE!

how stupid is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree, but winning matters...
...a lot.

I'm disappointed too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. do people think that anyone who was gonna vote AGAINST obama
is now gonna vote for him because he voted for fisa?

does everyone really think that will happen?

would you vote for mccramps if he voted against fisa? i sure as fuck wouldn't let that change my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I think he supported a part of the legislation, knew that voting no would only...
...be symbolic and fodder for the 527s, and hoped that he wouldn't lose support among his core constituency, and hoped he might garner support from some undecideds, and calculated that he could address the issues of greatest concern in RISA and Patriot Act as president with the support of congress.

It's a strategy with many facets.

Attempts to reduce it to just principles or any single aspect doesn't do justice to the realities of making complex decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. And those principles would stand him in good stead
serving in congress under President McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. see link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You've got it bass ackward.
There are millions out there who are wavering in the center - and repeated hits on Obama for not supporting the fight on terror would convince them to go with McCain.

We are not going to convince the hardcore of the other side, any more than they will convince progressives - the fight now is two-fold: to draw the center into the Democratic tend, and to prevent the center from being pulled into the Republican tent. That requires two strategies: to get our message out; and to prevent them from getting their message out.

It was an unfortunate, but necessary, strategic move. Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. He said he would filibuster it....
and he did the opposite. Credibility problem IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, THIS is a credibility problem...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I didn't click the link but...
are people really that simple minded that they play into the rightwing talking point about flip flops. They are using the same tactics they used against Kerry and I didn't see how they got away with it at that time.

With all of the evidence that showed that bush was a Liar,is this going to be a contest of who did the most flip-flops which is the media and the republicons talking point..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. of course it matters
he is now on record as not supporting our constitutional rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No he's not ...
so you prefer that the Republicons spend the rest of the campaign with the talking point that he is soft on terrorists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. no - I prefer our party remembers him as one that values
the freedoms and liberties of the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. What? Sorry, but, are you on Crack or something?
Are you saying his Yes vote on FISA was a No vote? Talk about your Orwellian double-speak.

He voted, and, his vote is a record of not supporting our constitutional rights. And BTW, before you draw a wrong conclusion, I am not a Clinton supporter. All my posts concerning Obama vs Hillary express my none support for Hillary and support for Obama. Now with this FISA vote and what it does to our Bill of Rights, I have to reevaluate my opinions about the candidate who proclaims "Change" but reminds me of the lyrics "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Do you really expect me to believe that..
he will be the same as bush.I think you are the one who is smoking crack. I could see all of this so called outrage about the constitution if it his vote would have mattered to change the outcome, but somehow I don't think it really matters you know it doesn't make any sense. Are you angry at the others who voted for it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. His vote doesn't matter?
Are you seriously trying to inject that since enough others voted for it his vote to rape a portion of our Bill of Rights doesn't matter? Well I wonder what a jury would think if a rapist testified his participation in a gang rape doesn't matter since the rape victim would have been raped anyway. See how ridiculous that sounds?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. In reality it doesn't matter..
just as your analogy doesn't. If he voted for it he doesn't change anything if he didn't he wouldn't have changed anything. Really,he should have not voted on it at all but, then you would have been angry because he didn't vote on it, so he can't win either way..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Now you're being presumptuous
Incorrectly I might add. What he should of done is vote YES for the constitution by voting NO on this bill. If he wouldn't have voted, that would have been good enough.

And yes it DOES matter because he voted for it. He voted to rape one of the amendments in our Bill of Rights and the analogy I gave is spot on. You're acting no better than the Repubs when Bush suspended habeas corpus. What a shame what we've become; willing to sell-out our founding principles to support those who crap on them. Its like our country suffers from Stockholm syndrome.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. If he would have voted no...
would the outcome be any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Still Trying To Inject That Dead Strawman?
I repeat. I wonder what a jury would think if a rapist testified his participation in a gang rape doesn't matter since the rape victim was being raped anyway. See how ridiculous that sounds?

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I wish there would have been this much outrage...
and protest when bush was running for he presidency and after he stole the election. I have never seen this much so called outrage for the nominee.. What will be his next test...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. There Was As I Remember
But maybe from your neck of the woods there wasn't. Nice obfuscation attempt, but, this strawman doesn't work either.

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. And thats all well and good
If he had..He could have been idealistic all the way to a landslide loss for him as the right painted him as soft on security!
I don't care if my candidate loses, as long as he stands for everything I beleive in and ignores the mainstream opinion!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. so you are going to allow the right to set the agenda
hmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. If Obama loses it will be because he didn't stand on principle.
Not because of the hypothetical nonsense you spout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. No it would not have effected the outcome
in fact the vote pretty much showed that it was filibuster proof. Having said that I don't think he did it out of pure political expediency. The new bill calls for an investigation of the last 7 years by the IG. Something I think in the end will bear a lot of fruit.

This bill wasn't perfect by any means but it also wasn't the end of the fourth amendment as many would have you believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. It only matters if it's important for a presidential candidate to defend the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. He will when he wins...
which some don't seem to want to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Or maybe they think he has less of a chance of winning if he sells out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Since you are on this board protesting everyday...
tell us what you want him to do,it seems that you are only talking just to hear your self talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Actually, I haven't been here in a few days - the thought police make it too boring...
Apparently you're here only to listen to yourself cheer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. You're right about the numbers... all the more reason for him to have kept his integrity!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. What integrity? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Ugh... I'm seeing it wane...
I was hoping for real change... I'm seeing the same old shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. So he should have voted for it just because everyone else did.
Wow, that makes it all okay! :sarcasm:

Every senator who voted for this piece of shit is a disgrace and Obama, who became the nominee on a promise of change, is the biggest disgrace of them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Sorry obama is not disgraceful...
Obama is very Graceful being that he has to live up to some unbelievable standards that I have never seen any candidate have to go through before. Mr.Obama is very graceful seeing that he has made his way through so much bullshit, thrown at him by so called Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Yes. Poor Obama! Boo hoo!
What unbelievably unreasonable assholes we are expecting him to not sell out the Constitution just so he could (in his mind) score a few political points. Forgive us, Barack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. How in the hell did he sell out the constitution..
when his vote wouldn't have changed the outcome. Its not about Obama its about you and the drama...Oh yeah we know,you are concerned about his integrity also...GoBama :dem: :dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. BECAUSE HE VOTED FOR IT!
Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Don't bother with insignificant stuff like that - just cheer and wave your pom-poms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC