Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"This country is not a private preserve for Protestants," Joe Kennedy once said.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:05 PM
Original message
"This country is not a private preserve for Protestants," Joe Kennedy once said.
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 03:10 PM by Drunken Irishman
The context of the quote was the possibility of John Kennedy winning the presidency.

"This country is not a private preserve for
Protestants. There's a whole new generation out there and it's filled with the sons and
daughters of immigrants from all over the world and those people are going to be
mighty proud that one of their own was running for President. And that pride will be
your spur."


That is the entire quote and of course, John Kennedy became the first American president who was, in fact, not Protestant. Yet this was in 1960 and since, America has yet to see a non-Protestant ascend to the presidency. In fact, since Kennedy's presidency, there has not been one white or black ethnic candidate to serve in the White House. That could change in January, but even as America became more diverse both culturally and religiously throughout the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s, we've still only had one Roman Catholic president, even though Catholicism is the largest religious denomination in America. And we've still only had one white ethnic president, Kennedy, who was Irish. Since, this country has pretty much been ruled by White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. So for all the barriers the Kennedy campaign supposedly broke in 1960, it's taken almost 50 years for America to be put in that position again. Why?

Kennedy won in large part by becoming the first non-WASP candidate. So many ethnic Americans felt if he could succeed, they could too. If he had a chance at the presidency, then so could an Italian-American, a Jewish-American and, yes, even an African-American. Yet here we are, 50 years later, and nothing really has changed in the terms of the presidency. Kennedy's victory didn't open the doors for a groundswell of minority candidates and it certainly didn't help the Catholics, as since John Kerry is the only Catholic to win the nomination from a major party. So if Obama wins, things aren't going to change dramatically. It could be another 50 years before we see a different type of president. Maybe it's a woman, or a Hispanic or a Jew. But we shouldn't expect that with this victory, bigotry and the disadvantages for many ethnic groups (and women too), will go away. Because they won't. Joe Kennedy thought electing a Catholic to the presidency would open the White House doors to future Catholics, it hasn't. Obama's victory will be a huge step in the right direction, but it's still only part of the fight and we must not think it ends the second he is sworn into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm betting Kaine will be his VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Me too
We'll see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Everybody's "ethnic"
It's racist to assert that only other ethnicities are ethnic, as if WASPs were the default. A Scot or Swede is no more or less "ethnic" than a Swahili.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You got me, I'm racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No, I'm just saying it's an assumption that comes from unquestioned societal racism.
People use that distinction all the time, ethnic food (nobody ever says this when they mean Kielbasa) ethnic dress (which means a dashiki, but not lederhosen) etc. You didn't start it, you probably just didn't think about it. It's not your fault we live in a society with a great deal of unquestioned racist assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Some of what you just wrote made no sense.

Kielbasa certainly *is* viewed by most Americans as ethnic food. Ditto lederhosen as ethnic dress.

I agree there is dress, food, etc considered American, e.g. baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet, as opposed to ethnic. But the two samples you picked are defintely deemed ethnic in this country.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. and how long before we have a woman of any colour or belief system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. My opinion? A long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. sadly, I think you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It almost happened this year
Hillary's problem wasn't that she was a woman. It was Mark Penn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Classing Kennedy as the first non-Protestant president is... controversial...
I'm not saying you're wrong, and I'm not saying you're right, but you could certainly start a *wonderful* bunfight over in R&T by innocently saying that in passing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think TJ broke that glass ceiling
But in a very quiet way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC