Hope And Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:28 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-29-08 02:28 PM by Hope And Change
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
nc4bo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Very short , to the point and all business. rec. nt |
dontforgetpoland
(152 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I kinda wish it refuted McCain a bit more than just 1 line. |
|
Needs more specifics on his Energy plan.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Why the hell is there nothing in there linking McCain to Bush? |
|
Another missed opportunity.
|
Median Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Question - Will Big Media Give This Ad Any Free Play? |
|
It seems like all the McCain campaign needs to do is put an ad on Youtube, and the ad is shown on all the major networks.
|
nc4bo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
6. PA's ad hit a bit harder for those looking for the KO punch |
intheflow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
That's a much more effective ad. I like that the Obama ad instructs people to read his whole energy policy at his website, but honestly, the people who need convincing are just not likely to go out of their way to use reason in choosing a president.
|
Phoonzang
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The ad should have taken it to McCain more |
|
They don't have to be vicious about it, but they need to make it clear that McCain is leveling ridiculous accusations. The same should be done for his "Obama didn't visit the troops" ad.
|
bkinsd
(175 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Those were my thoughts exactly |
|
Good ad, but need to point out how ridiculous the original McCain ad was.
|
nc4bo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I sincerely believe that it will come but not right now and probably not |
|
with Obama on it.
I know it's frustrating, it makes me sick to see mcgoo & co. getting away with murder but I really do think it will turn around.
btw, I'm 3/4 optimist, 1/4 pessimist and holding steady. :)
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'm with you...they need to make |
|
an ad with mccain the star of his own lies and rancid negativity.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. The tape is there. A few hours edit, and it can be all over. |
|
What is good about mcgaffe mess-ups going largely unnoticed is we a have a collection now. We have him on every side of every issue and butching the delivery. Let him keep shooting himself in the foot for some more reel time.
And, let it fly when the time is right. Mccain isn't a real threat, yet.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Precisely..the tapes are adding up to a |
|
crescendo for its climatic debut.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
22. not attacking McCain is the exact point of the ad |
|
and kind of the point of Obama's campaign.
|
JackORoses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It leaves McAnus looking hollow and pointless |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I like it...solutions not |
99th_Monkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
13. too bad the ad doesn't mention how Congr. GOP blocked Dem plan to lower gas prices. ~nt~ |
Indenturedebtor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. That would kinda throw a wrench in the "solutions not partisan bickering" approach though n/t |
99th_Monkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Maybe you're right ... leave that to MoveOn.org, et. al.. ~nt~ |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. ANd leave that to the congressional Dems. |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
18. "the same old politics?" |
|
:eyes:
That's the best they can do to highlight the Republican record?
Well, at least it's a response.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Well done. Houston... we have a fighter! |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Don't hurt me - but - |
|
It started out great, and just kinda fizzled after that.
Obama needs to give gramps a better spanking than that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |