Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:02 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Were you gullible enough to believe Bush condemned the SmearVet ad? |
|
Did you believe the first, breathless, incorrect reports?
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. yes, cuz o'lielly said he was reading an AP story----and why on earth |
|
would AP get it so wrong? (cuz the press is lazy)
dammit!
|
Ducks In A Row
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Never believe any report of shrub words until you hear it yourself |
|
they never report his correctly, because most of the time he's speaking like a drunken monkey
|
michigandem2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
3. didn't buy that eh officially "condemned" anything till I saw him |
|
speak...and it was * as usual...skirthing the issue...
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I will say it seemed very likely IF the overnight polls and this morning's focus groups all said the SB ads were now killing Bush.
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Bush CAN'T condemn the SmearVets, because the whacko freepers |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-23-04 01:40 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
are the core of his base. He can't afford to piss them off no matter what.
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-23-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Kick because the media is still spreading the false headline. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message |