Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What happens if the Hillary supporters nominate her for VP at the convention?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:46 PM
Original message
What happens if the Hillary supporters nominate her for VP at the convention?
Edited on Wed Aug-06-08 04:46 PM by BrentTaylor
And she actually gets the votes? What then happens to Obama's pick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting question, and I'll add to it -- Has this ever occurred before? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. If HIllary beats Obama's pick(and his pick is not HIllary)
Hillary gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Wow interesting. I think this has more potential to happen than her letting herself be nominated
for the nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. In that case, I become the presidential nominee, and Hugo Chavez is my VP.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. ugh.
funny timing but hubby was reading up on the constitution yesterday, and one oddball fact we found is that the vp was not chosen by the president, as it is now, but by electoral votes, if I recall correctly. Now I have no idea what amendment and when replaced this, if there ever was one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The 12th Amendment changed the Pres./VP to a single ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The VP is still chosen by a separate vote by the EC
Originally the VP was the person who got the 2nd most EC votes. Each elector had 2 votes and the Constitution didn't distinguish between Pres and VP electoral votes. In 1800 Jefferson and Burr tied in the EC due to this. Burr was the VP candidate but received the same number of electoral votes as Jefferson. Ultimately the House would choose Jefferson as President. After that the electoral votes were separated. Each elector has a pres vote and a VP vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. but not at the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. No thanks
Don't need the oil and water ticket. We tried that in 2004 and it sucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting idea. I think I like it. It certainly would be a way to show how much support she has
without challenging Obama for the Presidential nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Obama has earned the right to choose his VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Well then why is the vote for VP possible at all? The RULES are the rules after all. And the rules
allow it. And yes, Obama won, but just barely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I don't remember any recent President being forced to take a VP at the
convention. That would be an insanely ugly scene, and cause us to lose. The GOP are licking their chops for more Operation Chaos. If you are seriously suggesting this is a good idea, then you need to deprogram yourself of your cult-love for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't remember any nominee being so hard-headed about the best VP choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Wow. Sorry Obama didn't consult you for your opinion, but just as Hillary
Edited on Wed Aug-06-08 05:17 PM by wienerdoggie
would have earned the right to choose whom she wanted as VP, Obama has earned the right to choose as well. He has to be comfortable working with this person, it's HIS Presidency, his agenda, his administration. Bill and Hill already had THEIRS--8 years, for chrissakes--why should they be allowed to hijack the ticket? This would be the ultimate desperate, naked grab for power, and I would truly fear for Obama's life if Hillary forced her way onto the ticket, rather than his choosing her of his own freewill. Fortunately, it's extremely unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. What are you talking about?
You don't know who is in consideration.

You don't know who would be the best pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Obama said that Hillary would be on anybody's VP short-list. We have since come to find out that she
was never being considered, PERIOD. Roland Martin on CNN has confirmed this. So what was Obama's statement all about? Was he lying? Trying to string along disaffected Hillary supporters? It's very troubling statement given what we now know about the way the Obama camp feels about Hillary as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. She has high negatives, they have the numbers.
And how does Roland Martin know who is being considered. It could end up being Hillary. Just because she got runner up in the Primaries does not make her the best pick.

She would rally the puke base against the ticket and scratch old wounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Martin inferred on CNN that he heard it directly from Obama himself. And my post wasn't about
Hillary would be good or bad for the ticket. My post was about Obama saying one thing and we now know there's no truth to the statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I was responding to your post about Obama being "hard headed"
about picking the "best VP".

I think you are very wrong on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
77. How does this sound "You would make any guy very happy."
Does that sound like a wedding proposal to you? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. And if you think Hillary would have chosen Obama, think again. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
76. He said she'd be on anybody's short list ... far from saying she was his choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
60. meow?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. The DNC only cares about the rules when it favors their chosen candidate.
Under the rules, Hillary would be the VP because she came second, and a very closed second at that, in PD. She won't demand it, but she could if she wanted to. All this talk that it's up to the nominee to choose his VP is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Yeah, most Presidents don't choose their VP's. A brief review of history confirms that.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
62. Technically she could demand it.
When nominations were resolved in back room deals, the vice president was whoever came in second. In modern elections, the nominee usually has won by a wide enough margin that they have chosen their own VP. This year both top candidates came a hair from each other and the nominee won only thanks to the SDs. So yes, she could fight for it, but she would never do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #62
72. That would be lovely
The press could have a field day with it on the night he gets the nomination. Nothing like making a circus out of it. His speech would be overshadowed by the press going into hyperdrive about the "division" in the party. Yes, it would be great. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
74. don't bother, you're talking to the delusional -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #41
75. Primary rehash?
Yep, that's what I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
68. rules are rules! except the Fl and Michigan ones. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
73. "just barely" - ROFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
83. 1972 VP vote from Wiki
Thomas Eagleton - 1,742 (59.07%)
Frances Farenthold - 405 (13.73%)
Mike Gravel - 226 (7.66%)
Endicott Peabody - 108 (3.66%)
Clay Smothers - 74 (2.51%)
Birch Bayh - 62 (2.10%)
Peter W. Rodino - 57 (1.93%)
Jimmy Carter - 30 (1.02%)
Shirley Chisholm - 20 (0.68%)
Moon Landrieu - 19 (0.64%)
Edward T. Breathitt - 18 (0.61%)
Ted Kennedy - 15 (0.51%)
Fred R. Harris - 14 (0.48%)
Richard G. Hatcher - 11 (0.37%)
Harold Hughes - 10 (0.34%)
Joseph Montoya - 9 (0.31%)
William L. Guy - 8 (0.27%)
Adlai Stevenson III - 8 (0.27%)
Robert Bergland - 5 (0.17%)
Hodding Carter - 5 (0.17%)
César Chávez - 5 (0.17%)
Wilbur Mills - 5 (0.17%)
Wendell Anderson - 4 (0.14%)
Stanley Arnold - 4 (0.14%)
Ron Dellums - 4 (0.14%)
John J. Houlihan - 4 (0.14%)
Roberto A. Mondragon - 4 (0.14%)
Reubin O'Donovan Askew - 3 (0.10%)
Herman Badillo - 3 (0.10%)
Eugene McCarthy - 3 (0.10%)
Claiborne Pell - 3 (0.10%)
Terry Sanford - 3 (0.10%)
Ramsey Clark - 2 (0.07%)
Richard J. Daley - 2 (0.07%)
John DeCarlo - 2 (0.07%)
Ernest Gruening - 2 (0.07%)
Roger Mudd - 2 (0.07%)
Edmund Muskie - 2 (0.07%)
Claude Pepper - 2 (0.07%)
Abraham A. Ribicoff - 2 (0.07%)
Hoyt Patrick Taylor, Jr. - 2 (0.07%)
Leonard F. Wodcoock - 2 (0.07%)
Bruno Agnoli - 2 (0.07%)
Ernest Albright - 1 (0.03%)
William A. Barrett - 1 (0.03%)
Daniel Berrigan - 1 (0.03%)
Philip Berrigan - 1 (0.03%)
Julian Bond - 1 (0.03%)
Skipper Bowles - 1 (0.03%)
Archibald Burton - 1 (0.03%)
Phillip Burton - 1 (0.03%)
William Chappell - 1 (0.03%)
Lawton Chiles - 1 (0.03%)
Frank Church - 1 (0.03%)
Robert Drinan - 1 (0.03%)
Nick Galifianakis - 1 (0.03%)
John Z. Goodrich - 1 (0.03%)
Michael Griffin - 1 (0.03%)
Martha Griffiths - 1 (0.03%)
Charles Hamilton - 1 (0.03%)
Patricia Harris - 1 (0.03%)
Jim Hunt - 1 (0.03%)
Daniel Inouye - 1 (0.03%)
Henry M. Jackson - 1 (0.03%)
Robery Kariss - 1 (0.03%)
Allard K. Lowenstein - 1 (0.03%)
Mao Zedong - 1 (0.03%)
Eleanor McGovern - 1 (0.03%)
Martha Beall Mitchell - 1 (0.03%)
Ralph Nader - 1 (0.03%)
George Norcross III - 1 (0.03%)
Jerry Rubin - 1 (0.03%)
Fred Seaman - 1 (0.03%)
Joe Smith - 1 (0.03%)
Benjamin Spock - 1 (0.03%)
Patrick Tavolacci - 1 (0.03%)
George Wallace - 1 (0.03%)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. her support looks like a small group of screwed-up women in someone's backyard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. Scewed up women?
Oh that's nice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. It would do nothing
but further division and create talking points for Repugs. Also how would the non Obama VP pick feel about walking into Invesco?

Invesco is a brilliant move by Obama, it serves as a bodyguard of 70,000 people against 20 KKK types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Oh yah, wiat a super idea. To force Hillary and Bill on Obama -- what an admin that'd make!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
78. Theory vs. practice
If it would have no impact on the prospects for winning in November, that would be one thing. But it would have the effect of undercutting Obama's leadership from the start. Look, we already know how much support she has and we won't forget. 18 million voters, many of them true believers. That doesn't mean that anything that shows that support is worthwhile. What if, to show how much support Hillary had, all 18 million chose to stay home in November? Same idea, but more extreme, and bad for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hopefully that won't come to pass
If HRC forces her way onto the ticket against Obama's choice, that will NOT create very positive energy for the ticket.

Hopefully this is all just MSM-enhanced noise to create a distraction away from John McCain's crappy candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthN08 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I know this sounds all conspiracy theory and all
But maybe this is why Obama hasn't announced his VP yet. Maybe he knows what she is trying to jocking for being nominated for VP and he doesn't want to embarrass his choice and himself at the convention if she is chosen for him.

This is just sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Do you really think she wants to be VP that badly?
I honestly am not sure what she gains politically by forcing herself onto the ticket. If she did that and they lost she'd never get another chance to run for president...she'd be persona non-grata in the party. I am honestly surprised she even wants the VP slot at all...if she really believes Obama can't win, isn't she better off sitting it out and hoping for another chance in 4 years? And if he does win, would she really rather be VP than stay in the Senate and become a powerhouse there? She'll be 68 in 2016 and people tend to get sick of the same party after 8 years...only 2 sitting vice presidents have ever been elected president in US history. She'd have a better chance of winning in 2016 if she is not VP than if she is, and she'll have a better chance in 2012 if Obama loses if she was not on the ticket. So I am surprised she even wants the VP slot at all...I can't imagine she wants it enough to force herself onto the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
69. sure, since Cheney changed the rules and powers of VP
she'd be in the drivers seat.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. So it's said, we lose if Hillary is VP, and we lose if she is not VP.
I'd take my chances with the latter and let them break from the team. They do and we lose it's because they were not team players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
53. If you throw someone off your team, you don't get to blame them if you lose.
Pretending 50.1% of the vote is a mandate is Bush-level stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. No one threw anyone off the team.
Making threats is splitting from the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Who's making threats?
The OP is a hypothetical question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #63
79. Supporters threatening to go awol or vote McSame if Clinton isn't chosen as VP
Even though the majority of the Democratic team is against this and it's idea. Since the threat is in the desertion from the party itself or absent from it, Clinton supporters who are not team players (with the majority)who leave because the rest of us deeply feel Clinton as VP is a very bad idea and we lose because of this - then it is those ones at fault for losing the election to McSame.

I don't think it is going to happen but threatening only puts the fault where it belongs.

Bottom line - if your a team player you go with what the team wants and not against what the Democratic team wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #79
82. Well, if you want those supporters, you choose Clinton
If you don't choose Clinton, you obviously don't want their votes.

And if you don't want their votes, you don't get to blame them if you don't get them.

But if you're Bush-level stupid, of course you will. Ask him about how the "blame the Clintons for everything" strategy worked out for his team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary is not that stupid.
The woman is brilliant, she is not going to kneecap her legacy with a stunt like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. were you paying attention to her performance during the Primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. The boat has sailed
and Hillary Clinton knows that. Granted there are some who really want that ticket, but it is not a good match. If Hillary had gotten the nod, Obama would NOT be a good match for her.

Two very powerful personalities. And a lot of water under those bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
54. Policywise, they are alike as two peas in a pod
Remember when the leftists here used to refer to them as "Hillbama?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Things I used to believe and say vehemently:
Bill Clinton is too smart to ever have an affair with an intern.

Bill Clinton wouldn't have TIME to have an affair. He's president, for God's sake.

After having to eat my words, I don't rule anything out anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yeah, you're real classy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Hey, it is NOT my fault that...
he did those things. And after having defended him over and over again to any who would listen, AND having to eat crow over it, I think I kind of have the right to mention having been duped before. And that is why I won't rule anything out about their intentions. I'm too cynical now. I wish I could put the genie back in the bottle, but I'm afraid it's too late.

And THAT is not my fault, either. I learned the hard way that even very intelligent people do screwed up things and then lie right to your face about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. So are the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I hear you on that,
But I think Hillary is heads up smarter than Bill Clinton. Now Bill, he would be all over that, that is right up his alley. He is such a political animal.

But you are right, a person can't rule out anything. Whew that would just be such a gift for McCain, if they had that kind of battle at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I'm also not ruling out that Hillary is much to smart to do that. Just
so folks know that I am not passing official judgment or anything.

And I think that if she had run her campaign the way SHE wanted to, without the bad advice from Bill and Penn, she just might have been successful. So perhaps she has learned to listen to her own counsel on political matters now. She is much closer to what democrats want than Bill is these days, so her experience and intuition should guide her. And I hope it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Oh my God Jennifer, she got the worst of the worst advice
Here in Iowa, it was just a disaster. They did her a great dis justice. They should demand their money back from Penn. But that was then, and boy am I glad those primaries are over!. But is was a study in how your supporters can do you more damage than good.

My brother was one of her biggest supporters in South Dakota. He got on the Obama express, the day after the SD primary. (My son was the whip for Biden, while we were Obama..talk about some interesting discussions on the home front :rofl:)

I think there are great things ahead for Hillary, but it is not as an embattled VP, it would be the MSM's pipe dream. That would be all we would hear about. Whether true or not.. They would just make it up, because it would feed the MSM's need for juice.

I am feeling really in the real world here.. Things are looking very positive for Obama with our working class voters!! :pals:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. If Obama is elected
Edited on Wed Aug-06-08 05:37 PM by Jake3463
After such a stupid fiasco that divides the party in half. They feel his wrath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. Then we'd have a winning ticket. That prospect horrifies you, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. You can't have a winning ticket if the top of the ticket is resentful about not getting his pick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. Good God Almighty! Hillary is already Obama's pick.
She is the VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I bet you a cup of coffee and sweet roll that it is NOT
Hillary. I think it might be Bayh. He is a little on the milquetoast side for me. But I think it might be him :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. I think you might be right about Bayh.
I also believe that both Obama and Hillary have strong personalities and would not be a good match even if she had won the primary.
She is too smart to push for VP and might be more valuable to his administration in a cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. My thoughts exactly.
Either way would not have worked. Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama. She has been dogged about her health care initiative since the first Clinton term. I bet you dollars to doughnuts Hillary would love nothing more than to be the one who spearheads health care and put all those boo birds to bed. :)..A cabinet post, for that initiative. Thats' what its going to take for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Agree, it's going to take all of our best minds to get this country on the right track..
Edwards, Clark and Feingold would also be excellent choices for his cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #48
71. If anyone should get a cabinet level post for a health care initiative
It should be Dennis Kucinich. If were going to fix health care, let's do it right (HR 676) and not waste time with a corporatist shell game like Hillary was campaigning on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. There is at least
a one in a million chance that you are correct. Not much better than 1 in a million, but then my chances are probably no worse than one in 2 million, and I am not even going to be at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. Cagefight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. UFC make it happen-nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. She will not allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. Hillary becomase the Veep nominee and the Dems lose
Edited on Wed Aug-06-08 09:07 PM by IWantAnyDem
because Hillary would have made Obama look weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
56. If her supporters nominate her
they will lose the floor vote and it will be an embarrasment to the entire party in prime time. This will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. Obama controls the chair and the convention.
Do you think Hilly's aging army is going to attack the stage and seize the mike?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
61. It won't happen. She will not stampede the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
64. In 1972, McGovern got the nomination.
Frances "Sissy" Farenthold, a Houston attorney and 1972 candidate for Governor of Texas, got the second highest number of delegate votes at the Democratic convention, so she should have gotten the Vice-Presidential nomination. She didn't.

It was McGovern-Eagleton and then McGovern-Shriver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
65. I read that someone has to sign something, making themselves available for the slot.
She did not sign it and said she has no interest in the position. Without that signature, even if her name was brought up, she could not be voted for. I do not know if it is true or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. Here is something on it.
The New York Daily News is reporting that a “source close to” Hillary Clinton has ”confirmed she won’t file a formal request to the convention asking to be nominated along with Barack Obama.”

Party rules stipulate that Clinton must ask in writing to be nominated herself and also submit a petition signed by 300 to 600 delegates. Without her signed request, petitions of support are meaningless.

But, the New York Daily News notes, as other media sources have in recent weeks, that “personally and through surrogates, Clinton has counseled her 1,886 delegates to vote for Obama.”
http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/01/hillary-clinton-asks-not-to-be-nominated-at-dem-convention/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
67. That's a daring idea.........
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 12:49 AM by Beacool
I just hope that I have enough popcorn in the house.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
70. They can nominate their brains out, Hillary doesn't have the enough delegate votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #70
80. She is delusional, so logic may not rule the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
81. Hillary has to state that she wants it she is respecting his decision I hear up to him really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. The line of thinking that if Clinton is not on the ticket
that her voters are unwanted or shunned is ridiculous!!!

They are supposed to be Democrats. They are supposed to support our platform. They are supposed to care about the country.

That sentiment is bullshit. Everyone else has got behind the past nominees, especially when there is no major platform difference. This is not about issues but personality and I consider the tact as unacceptable. This country is going in the wrong direction double time and we cannot afford a bunch of nonsense. It's a shame that a few are trying to make this general election about placating hurt feelings and pride in a candidate over going after independents and winning the damn election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
85. That's why he should have picked his Veep this week...
By waiting until the convention this is happens. I mean how could they not know this would happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
86. we all laugh real hard and then they really nominate someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC