|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:34 PM Original message |
Clark Looking for a Female VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Someone should tell him the lady from Michigan is Canadian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. Oopsie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. I guess Clark doesn't know the requirements of a VP in the United States. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:09 PM Original message |
Umm Scott it was a simple gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
56. Didn't Dean once say we should sanction Vermont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
68. No it wasn't. See post #35. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #68 |
80. well ok but its a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drfemoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #80 |
109. Did you happen to stick up for Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
52. That's disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildThang (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 07:19 PM Response to Reply #52 |
108. naw . everyone knows he's planning to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
90. The actual subject appears to have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
92. Deleted message |
joefree1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:14 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. negative x 2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bain_sidhe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
118. Hello? It was a list of "notable women in politics" not VP candidates! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boo Boo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 10:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
120. Don't worry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. smart move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evil_orange_cat (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
75. Pelosi would be best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
91. Not Braun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hillary, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Oh, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
76. BAD idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Isn't that presumptious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funky_bug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. What game hasn't been played around here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. shuffleboard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. LOL! I am in awe of you, dave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. He doesn't poll well with the ladies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
54. they said that about Dan Quayle too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demigoddess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. I vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. There's a MAJOR Clark gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. On Parr With Saying Osama Should Be Presumed Not Guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I consider it far far worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. What a stretch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Oh yes, knowledge of the Bible is soooo much more important than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. Walt, Seriously - that's a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Either he doesn't know consitutional law, or he didn't research somebody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Manufactured Hysteria much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. You're entitled to your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windansea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
81. Gaffeology 101 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barbara917 (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
117. I didn't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
64. Well, Dean's The One Who Touted Himself As Knowing The Bible Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. According to a post below, Clark is supposed to be a constitutional law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funky_bug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #74 |
83. Facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joefree1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
100. Hee hee, funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
103. You Just Dont Get It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Ummm, no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. How can we elect someone ignorant of constitutional law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Even bigger gaffe, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Yet again, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. You're free to have that opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. You make no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. The fact that he either does not know constitutional law or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. Once more resounding no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 06:21 PM Response to Reply #77 |
105. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:24 PM Response to Reply #69 |
88. Excuse me, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
114. Try some decaf, Walt. Jesus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. You mean like the Fourth Amendment? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. Very silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfecap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. He taught Constitutional law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. He can do everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfecap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. Whudda guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. I call foul on your last post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
97. Oh, Brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. I'm sorry if you take humbrage with my post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
78. I thought that was your guy Dean? NBD right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Um, this is a literary device |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
73. Umm, the Fourth Amendment, not Article II |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #73 |
86. Ummmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. Zero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poopyjr (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
79. Yeah, except he DIDNT refer to her as a potential VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turkw (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-04 12:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
122. the only gaff is by the Clark bashers- it is a list of notable Women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
10. Mary Landrieu would be a bush ass kicker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bschoech (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Cheney doesn't qualify to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:12 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. The constitution states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evil_orange_cat (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. yikes, I don't like the idea of Mosley-Braun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. Of those, CMB would have my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
96. Piggy Noonan?? Jack, you can't be serious!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. LOL - Just something to brighten your day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. Clark Corrected Himself The Other Day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kayla (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
16. This sounds like one of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
19. This Meshes Perfectly With His Strong Support of Women in the Military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. is that a "gaffe" then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. maybe that representative from California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
35. For those who didn't read it... Clark said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
53. Precisely. Everyone should read your post. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
66. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark4VotingRights (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
115. Thanks for giving us the facts Killarney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfecap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
36. I hope it's Sen. Clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
40. This sounds like a lame and lazy attempt by Clark to close his gender gap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. Clark needs to choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. *very* good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fricasseed_gourmet_rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
42. Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark4VotingRights (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
49. Gee, not to be sexest (I'm a female), but I don't think this is the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Journeyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
61. Right you are, C4VR. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
71. I respectfully disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adjoran (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
59. Hillary won't do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. A big NO WAY IN HELL to Feinswine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #59 |
95. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
63. What gaffe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
72. That would be fabulous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
84. only if he wants to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Powerlock (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
85. Hm if this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. For the record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 09:29 PM Response to Reply #85 |
116. If Clark said this last week, why wasn't it news at the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mndemocrat_29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
89. Mary Landrieu would be the best candidate here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Tauscher is GREAT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
101. Ummm, does he know the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Ummm, do you know how to read? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
106. Carol Mosley-Braun would be great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
107. Something about this doesn't sound right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
110. DO YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 07:45 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. HERE'S THE LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
111. This makes me uneasy for a couple reasons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 08:04 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. If Clark chose Hillary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #111 |
121. When is going to be the right time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turkw (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #111 |
123. Don't worry, the chauvinists will be voting Bush, with the Racists and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
webkev (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-05-04 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
119. ha ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC