Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think it is below us to bring up McCain's affair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:59 PM
Original message
I think it is below us to bring up McCain's affair
Let's stick to the issues as much as the McCain camp. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice.
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it also below the belt to discuss whether Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, it would be ungentlemanly to mention that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Or the silly tabloid rumor that Bush is sleeping with Condi?
Edited on Sat Aug-09-08 08:10 PM by IanDB1








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That idea makes me throw up a little in my mouth....
And did you hear anything about Rush Limbaugh being a drug-addicted pedophile??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Self delete...Dupe post...
Edited on Sun Aug-10-08 10:25 AM by rasputin1952
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. Ah...but Limbaugh has admitted to being a drug addict...
the pedophilia has yet to be proven...even though his alter-ego, Jeff Christie, has a record of such activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. But he's her husb....I mean, the President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It's completely fucking WRONG to imply that Rush Limbaugh
Is a drug-addicted pedophile.

I have HEARD that Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile.

But I have no personal knowledge that Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile.

So I don't think we should imply that Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I have HEARD that Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile too.
But, as far as I know, the statement that Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile, is not necessarily the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. It seems absurd that a ginormous sweaty slobbering moron
with a name like Rush Limbaugh would be a drug-addicted pedophile,

but if people think Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile,

it's no problem with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. As far as we know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. Damn, beat me to it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. Some people say.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addicted pedophile?
Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL.
When was the last time McCain talked issues?

Point well made.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Which one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Uh, issue? The issue of Obama not being boring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I meant which one of McCain's affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Put it this way. McCain's campaign doesn't want to bring up McCain's affair
If just ONE Repig even mentions either Bill Clinton or John Edwards and their affairs in a spin, it is completely fair game to bring up the question as to just how McCain was able to marry his beer heiress with a marriage license before he was even divorced from his first wife.

Put it this way. If Obama had married Michelle before he was divorced from his first wife, he wouldn't have made it past the Iowa caucus.

I'd start with how Johnny Songbird isn't really even a war hero. Ask Bob Dornan. That's THE Commercial.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. McCain's affair really should not even be brought up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. Exactly.
The POW issue is a material fact because he himself made it so.

And if a substantial number of his voters are going to be basing that on "family values", then his affairs are material facts too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have heard McCain was a bigamist. He got his marriage license to Cindy before he divorced Carol...
... and abandoned her and his children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Sounds rather small of him. Why do they call it 'bigamy'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. this is absolutely accurate
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-divorce11-2008jul11,0,6546861.story

In his 2002 memoir, "Worth the Fighting For," McCain wrote that he had separated from Carol before he began dating Hensley.

"I spent as much time with Cindy in Washington and Arizona as our jobs would allow," McCain wrote. "I was separated from Carol, but our divorce would not become final until February of 1980."

An examination of court documents tells a different story. McCain did not sue his wife for divorce until Feb. 19, 1980, and he wrote in his court petition that he and his wife had "cohabited" until Jan. 7 of that year -- or for the first nine months of his relationship with Hensley.

Although McCain suggested in his autobiography that months passed between his divorce and remarriage, the divorce was granted April 2, 1980, and he wed Hensley in a private ceremony five weeks later. McCain obtained an Arizona marriage license on March 6, 1980, while still legally married to his first wife.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
42. I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like bigamy to me.
The marriage ceremony is not what carries legal weight.

It's the license registered with the state government.

Therefore, it seems to me that McCain was a bigamist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Getting the license before the divorce is final is not bigamy. Getting married
before the divorce is final IS bigamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Don't you have to indicate whether you're already married when you apply for the license?
Wonder what he said....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. We didn't in CA in 1985. Hubby's final decree didn't come through
Edited on Sun Aug-10-08 11:52 AM by mnhtnbb
until about 4 days before the wedding. Maybe it was the blood tests that we got earlier. I was sweating bullets. He'd been separated from her for well over a year and it was a nasty divorce. I can't remember now whether we waited to get the license. And my copy of the license was destroyed when our house burned down last summer. I guess that's one more document I should get replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Character is an issue.... Unsubstantiated rumors are below us., facts are not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. But facts are such useless things!
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Your right we should not mention McCain's affair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. it would be wrong to discuss his lobbyist friend
and the rides she gave him on her corp jet which he did not claim properly. and i couldn't say, I mean, I wouldn't want to say anything but Nancy Reagan has said it all you know she can't stand McCain because of how he mistreated his first wife, sleeping with all those girls he's lucky he didn't get a disease...did he? and poor cindy, he rushed her to the alter when his career was going nowhere and her daddy gave him a career and the money to fund it and then there are all of those people in arizona politics who can't stand the man. he never was known for having any character and i guess Washington hasn't changed him any. i heard he took money from Islamic interests for his campaign but then he was never a loyal person. he brought reporters to the hospital to document his visit to a dying famous friend. too bad he cheated on all his wives. well, we don't know the details and it's none of our business, I'm sure:-) I just can't say why he calls himself the maverick when W calls him the Double Talker and I guess W would know. I can't think of a worse insult coming from someone with such a low bar for integrity. But that's neither here nor there, bless his heart. Wish him all the best and hope he gets it together.

(that's a little southern strategy sarcasm for y'all)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. bush/mccain a backbreaker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. McCain's character is an issue that needs to be discussed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
40. I disagree, McCain's affair shouldn't even be mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Its below Obama...that is why its our job to inform the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Precisely.
...and, unfortunately.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Exactly. Obama won't do it. But surrogates can. I think we
can pass the information along, too. Especially in response to those disgusting emails we get from our right wing wacko friends and relatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Maybe we should do preemptive strikes..."before you send me an email
about what a sleaze Edwards is, you ought to know this about John McCain".

That should shut them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
33. You are SO right. Emphasis on McCain's old age & apparent senility, his affairs, his undignified
sense of humor, should NOT be discussed. Let's stick to the issues. For example, is he a Manchurian candidate, under the mind control of nefarious forces wanting to take over the world? This is the real concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
34. I'm perfectly happy if surrogates bring the issue up. It says a lot
about his character. If that is really what republicans care about then we should give it to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
39. Play fair and lose. No thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
44. I would do an ad that his infiidelity should not be an issue...
Make the ad start off with Repigs using the Edwards scandal and then make a point that examining McCain's history of infidelity should not be an issue.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC