Here is the last paragraph of the article:
"There is value in pursuing the same issues from a different perspective. But it seems that this year we are destined again to see them through the same lens."
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080819_same_old_white_guys_run_the_debates/There are several criteria that could be changed. Am I disputing the fact that the people named are qualified? Absolutely not!
Of the qualifiers, you chose the word "white" as my objection. I would like to see some variety. Does that mean that random new
people from wherever should be yanked in just to have diversity? No! However, I have to believe that there are qualified women, minorities,
and people in different age groups who are qualified. It's not a matter of not wanting Lehrer, Brokaw, and Schieffer but a matter of
wanting that "new perspective."
"Since the commission began running debates in 1988, only one female correspondent, Carole Simpson of ABC, has moderated a presidential forum.
That was in 1992 and the format was a “town hall” meeting in which Simpson’s role was to facilitate questions from the audience, not ask them herself. Before his retirement, CNN’s Bernie Shaw moderated both a presidential and a vice presidential debate. Simpson, Shaw and Ifill are the only African-Americans who’ve had such high-profile roles."
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080819_same_old_white_guys_run_the_debates/If there haven't been any people besides Old. White. Guys. since 1992 who have become qualified, then something is wrong somewhere.
:hi: