Is there a VP pick who would NOT be saddled with these problems?

[Sparkly]

Evidently, we're in for a ticket with a VP who has one or more problems:

1. No national security, foreign policy, or military experience

OR

2. Voted "yes" on the IWR, taking away the rationale for Obama's campaign on "judgment."

AND/OR

3. In addition, it may be someone who doesn't help in the south, and/or someone who pisses off the Clinton supporters, and/or someone who's a long-term "Washington Insider."...

(Disclaimer: Yes, I'm voting for the ticket. I would prefer a ticket with the best possible chance of winning.)

[Sparkly]

1. No, huh?

:shrug:

[Dinger]

2. Vice President Wesley Clark, That's Who!

:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

3. You are correct (Hmmm... is this OP a set-up?)

[Sparkly]

4. Well....

I did have him in mind.

Is there anybody else who doesn't carry any of these negatives?

[Lewiskw]

5. Bill Richardson N/T

[Sparkly]

6. Fair enough!

:hi:

[DFLforever]

7. Is there any evidence at all that Obama and Clark

have any kind of working relationship or rapport that would lead to his serious consideration for VP?

Supposedly Kerry advised Obama this was essential to an effective VP/Pres partnership and something which he completely lacked with Edwards.

[Sparkly]

8. No evidence Obama ever even considered him. nt

[DFLforever]

9. That's what I thought.

Yet a day doesn't go by without someone on DU proposing an Obama//Clark
ticket.

[Lewiskw]

10. Wes Clark

Is an old fart and really doesn't bring much other then foreign relation plus I bet more then half clark supporters cant even name what war he led.

[snowbear]

11. An old fart?

.
.

If General Clark is an old fart ...

...the old man McSame must be dead.

[Sparkly]

12. Hahahaha!!!

Yer funni.