babsbunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:22 PM
Original message |
|
why aren't they chanting IMPEACH!!?
|
marlakay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. because most of them are party insiders |
|
isn't it hard to become a delegate? and they are from alot of states that are red states and purple who wouldn't even think of impeaching...
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Because we'd like a Democrat in the White House |
|
For fucks sake some of you truly need to be smacked.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Indeed. Go start your own damn party if you don't like ours! |
|
Just get the f**k out of the way as we march forward, and win the White House. And, Pelosi knows how to accomplish that better than the damn nut jobs who have no clue about how government work.
|
TTUBatfan2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes she is a phoney... |
|
Terrible at connecting with people, flip-flops on issues, and is just as bad of a representative of the Democratic Party as Bush is of the Republican Party. She goes on TV interviews and gets her clock cleaned by Republican counterparts and in general stumbles all over her words. CLUELESS.
|
Middle finga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Ahh! go away Nancy, you are a phony and a failure |
|
Talking about how great this country is but yet you stand by while it's robbed and trashed by thugs and criminals.
|
chatnoir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
5. She's completely nauseating. I can barely listen to her speak. |
|
She's coming across as completely phoney and fake in the post-speech interview.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The Speaker is chosen by majority vote... |
|
...of the House Democratic caucus. The same people who would be voting on impeachment voted in that caucus.
You want different? Elect better Democrats.
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Jesus H Christ hanging off the bloody cross |
|
More so for the replies (most) than your OP, but for you too.
|
goodgd_yall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Fran Kubelik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I am assuming this is satire |
|
Making fun of the assholes who want Pelosi to impeach just months before Bush is scheduled to leave office. I like your sense of humor! :thumbsup:
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Is she a cell-phone-y or a land-line? |
Politicub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The Pelosi haters come across as small and pathetic, especially during her time at the convention.
|
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
hexola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I consider her the "accidental" speaker of the house |
|
She was swept in as the Bush-lovers were swept out...kinda stuck with her for the moment.
|
styersc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Win the Whitehouse, strengthen House and Senate, then |
|
oust Pelosi. Chris Shay would make a poretty good Majority Leader in the Senate as well.
|
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-25-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I think that we need a new Speaker of the House. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |