New York Daily News: Hillary did great! YAY! New York Post: Hillary did terrible! BOO!

[Bicoastal]

Like two parallel realities.

(As an extra special bonus game, guess which daily is owned by Rupert Murdoch?)

[livvy]

1. I don't know how anyone could claim with a straight face that...

her speech was not an outstanding one. She did a wonderful job.

The Post is nuts anyway...bunch of robots just repeating what they've been programmed to spew.

[Andy823]

2. The repukes

Just want to make more trouble, and stir up things with the PUMA bunch, it don't think it's going to work!

I see all the usual but heads on TV, repukes, saying she didn't do enough, she could have done more, she didn't say Obama was read to be commander and chief, she didn't give her supporters enough to vote for Obama, and and on...! Problem is that is what they want to see, not the truth. She did a great job, and I am sure that by the time November comes around, the vast majority of her "real" supporters will be voting for Obama. Now the repukes that claim to be democrats supporting her will still be trying to cause trouble, but it isn't going to work.

I am ready for Bill to do the same thing Hillary did, and I really think he will!

[ErinBerin84]

3. reading the post is like walking into a parallel universe, sort of like watching Fox.

My dad reads the Post, and I read it at his house when I visit him. They present the opinions of jonas goldberg and Michelle Malkin as news (literally)and glamorize the lives of wall street 20 something douchebags. Nothing Hillary Clinton could ever say would make them happy, so I take it as good news that they think she did poorly.

[apnu]

4. Same in Chicago

Sun-Times: We love Hillary
Tribune: Hillary sucks.

What else is new?

[Cha]

5. And these are what count..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6772931