Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is a lot of sexist bullshit being throw on these threads because of mccain's VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:48 PM
Original message
There is a lot of sexist bullshit being throw on these threads because of mccain's VP
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 12:52 PM by still_one
That is uncalled for and stupid

The focus is, do we want a continuation of the bush/cheney policies through mccain?

This has nothing do do with gender, but everything to do with judgement AND EXPERIENCE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. we are different than the republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. AMEN!
Just because she's an underqualified beauty queen is no reason for sexism that we wouldn't tolerate in our own party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. she has no judgement or experience...his choice is sexism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's patronizing on his part, for sure
But should we respond by calling this woman sexist names?

NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That is a valid point, but some of the remarks on DU are pretty bad
and are not arguing from that perspective

We have this on the issues

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. you can bet mccain made his decision BECAUSE she's a woman...not because she's a leading politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM
Original message
Your point is valid and NOT sexist. That is not what I was referring to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
65. i must be naive, i don't even know what that means!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's a woman. Calling her a woman is not sexist.
For the record, I'm a woman. Was that sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. That is NOT what I am saying, but if you have seen some of the posts
made about her with sexual references, that IS sexist

For the record I'm a guy

For me the issue is simply do we want a continuation of bush policies?


NO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Calling her a "brood mare" is, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Calling her a bimbo is
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. when you act bimbo-like you will be called a bimbo..
when you act ignorant, you will be called stupid. She's NOT a feminist. She is anti-feminism. I will not give her that kind of respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. She may not be a feminist
but you're still a sexist.

Welcome to my "buddy" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
84. Yep. I haven't seen that one, but yes in this case it is.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 05:47 PM by Phx_Dem
However, some woman are bimbos. Think Hooters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. sorry to disagree, but if she weren't a woman, she wouldn't have been
chosen.

Her sex is what McCain chose her for.

And that puts gender into the mix.

Whether we want it there or not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That logic
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM by Undercurrent
should not lead to using sexist/derogatory terms against Palin.

I don't like going after her motherhood choices, her looks etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. That is NOT what I am saying, references like VPILF, and other posts like it
are sexists

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. So what, we've talked about Obama's sex appeal before..
big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
68. Bingo...
Sometimes I wonder... jeez.

Oh, and I agree with your bimbo comment above too... I think it apropos of a woman who find herself running for an office she knows nothing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't like the "she should stay home because she has kids" posts.
These posters would have felt right at home in the 1950s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. Unless it's calling out fundie hypocritical nonsense, then agreed..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
66. They are talking about her going back to work after 3 days after
giving birth to a child with a disability. Even professional women like doctors and lawyers take a few weeks off with their newborns. It doesn't pass the Family Values smell test, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. This isn't a feminist forum
If I wanted to hear constant bitching about how someone is treated just because they are a woman i'd go to a dedicated feminist forum. Go preach to the people that want to hear and let the rest of the internet be the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Wrong.
Feminist causes are in our party platform, and supported by our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. Yes but there is a difference between supporting and policing.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:18 PM by gal
/me checks the name on the forum I joined....don't see feminist anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. So then you agree with references like VPILF. You think that is a good position to take, huh!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. VPILF. ROTFLMAO
That. Is. Awesome.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Want to watch us lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Lighten up, Francis.
If you don't catch the irony in that epithet and how it goes to the heart of McSame's pandering, sexist decision, I can't help you.

VPILF. Absolutely PERFECT. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. whatever /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. That's pretty much what I was aiming for. Apparently the irony was lost on some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. DU is an irony-free zone
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I used to think it was only Republicans who were irony-challenged.
Apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EatTacos Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. VPILF, LOL, she is easy on the eyes, I have to say that.
All the comments complaining about her having 5 kids, calling her a breeder, these people need to stop and think about it for a minute.

Alaska....6 months of darkness....cold, cold, cold winters.
If you're trying to stay warm by snuggling up to someone as pleasant looking as her, well.....having a few kids seems almost inevitable from my point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. She's a bit too Katherine-Harris-y for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EatTacos Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. It never occured to me to even compare the two
I'm trying to imagine one of these pics of Palin, but with about 20 pounds of makeup on.
Maybe I'll just have to photoshop one to see. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Have you been to the site?
Its been up for months and is obviously very favorable to her. If it was offensive to her, couldnt she have it taken down? I dont know, Im asking?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Nope, didn't even know it existed /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
51. I may not ..but I don't think it's your place or anyone else's place to police the internet.
Unless your a moderator here...are you?
If the mods think it's wrong they will take care of it, otherwise you need to watch your own actions not the actions of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. OK. Here is a major problem with Palin
What if McCain croaks and she becomes president? A *woman* with her finger on the nuclear trigger, when she gets to "that time of the month"? Now that is *scary*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Thank you, THAT IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT, NOT!!!!
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:05 PM by still_one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
83. Yeah, right...
Like a man who's having good sex at 3am is going to pick up the bat phone.

It goes both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. I would have thought ALL democrats are feminist
All the word means is the belief in equality.
That seems to me a basic democratic value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glancingthefuture Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
60. you are right. To be otherwise is to be undemocratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. All democrats are feminists
Men and women in the party should get out there and tell the world this.
Non feminists are in the wrong party. I don't know where they belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glancingthefuture Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
74. Well that's painfully obvious
All we feminists do is bitch, bitch, bitch, right "gal"?

Democrats used to be feminists and proud of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jobama Biden Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. And so it begins...
The wound that the convention tried to heal slowly reopens.

If you didn't think this was their goal, you're an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. You are right /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
75. And look who opened it?
We had an opportunity here to take the high road, but some here seem determined to take everything into the dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. He's using her as an inexperienced pawn, nothing more. Cheapens the feminist movement. Plus, she
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM by Obama_for_our_future
sucks something terrible. Trooper-gate, and how in the hell did she get elected in AK being anti-environment??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. omg. here we go again. Can someone compile a list
of what is off limits and post it as a sticky? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Referring to an opponent in a sexual degrading way, how is that for starters /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. she is under investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. BULLSHIT. This is dirty pandering politics at its worst.
and this decision was every bit about gender and I hope McCain CHOKES on it.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. I am not referring TO THAT, I am referring to sexual references about her
that are in quite a few threads

Pandering is absolutely right, but degrading sexual references are not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. agreed with you there.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. I should have made it clearer what I meant in the start thread, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sad to say, I'm not surprised.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM by goodgd_yall
It's unbecoming of a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Amen
still_one

I dislike her - because she just stood up there and said she doesn't really know what the Veep does.

:wtf:

Just like I like Hillary, Madeleine Albright, and Nancy Pelosi - because they are intelligent, experienced, and CAPABLE.

There are plenty of things to knock "THAT" Woman on. Having a vagina shouldn't be one of them.

That said - can we start calling her "THAT" Woman? Since she's not one of yours (men at D.U. picking on her for having a vagina).


Hmm - I think there are many Democratic men who feel like - hey . . .:mad: they blast OUR women. We are going to blast THAT woman.:mad:

Maybe we should give them a day to get it out of their systems and they'll go back to their normal sweet pea selves tomorrow! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Picking topless Palin IS the sexist insult. Pointing out that she
wouldn't have been picked if she weren't female and cute is not sexist.

It's like McCain is saying that NO woman is really qualified so he might as well go with someone who poses sans enough clothes on magazine covers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
43. The media is telling this is a whole new game
because she is a woman... Is that sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. It speak volums about McCain, young, pretty and low on experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
58. Oh, great. A PUMA member weighs in
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
59. Yes, there are some gender-coded insults that should be avoided but telling it like it is shouldn't
be avoided like it's a bad thing. I won't knock her for choosing the traditional female role of being a mother because that's admirable.

But I have a HUGE problem with someone who fucking allows herself to basically be a TROPHY for a chauvinistic and misogynistic candidate and party. She's being paraded around as a SYMBOL of what she could have been and not as a TESTAMENT to what she is. This cannot help but tell me that she got picked for her looks alone. That just fucking pisses me off.

Don't give me that fucking shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madura Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
61. dupe-deleted
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:50 PM by madura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madura Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. there is more sexist bullshit in 4 hours here against Palin than in
the entire primary Hillary ran in.
i call hypocrits that think it's okay to degrade a woman because she is a republican but think democratic women are somehow special and deserved of more respect.

i just hate this part of human nature.
I don't like Palin for many reasons other than her being a woman, much as I thought Hillary was all wrong for the job of Prsident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
64. It also has to do with her hypocrisy. She claims to put family values
first, but I don't see that in a woman who hands off her disabled newborn after three days and goes back to work. Something doesn't smell right with her, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
67. But his pick is purely a gender pick.
Guess he figured the token black man wouldn't work.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. I'm a woman. The choice of Palin reminds me of that old joke
about stand women on their heads and . . . . That's a horrible joke with an obscene meaning, but apparently the GOP thinks that Palin = Hillary.

These are the same guys that thought that Harriet Meiers equaled Sandra Day O'Connor.

They see all women as equally insignificant.

Palin is to be respected as a mother and for her civic service on a local level. But she has only served 18 months of her first term as governor and her bios show her only other relevant experience to be city council/mayor of a little village of 6,815 people (according to Wasilla's website). She has no apparent national, much less international, experience.

Here is the rest of the information on the town in which she gained what is apparently the totality of her experience in government.

http://www.cityofwasilla.com/index.aspx?page=49

The Republicans cannot be serious.

Abraham Lincoln came out of nowhere and a small town -- but he was an experienced lawyer who had spent time in cities and served in the state legislature. And he became president when a good part of the U.S. was still frontier -- before railroads reached all the out of the way places.

Palin is no doubt a nice person, but she is not qualified to have her finger on the nuclear trigger. Did she even spend a junior year abroad? What foreign policy experience does she have? Did a trade delegation from China even visit Wasilla while she was mayor?

She is intended to present the face of innocence and freshness, to front for the evil men who control the Republican Party and who will control her if she becomes VP.

Face it: Palin was the only "leader" in the Republican Party who could pass the smell test at all, who did not have a terrible scandal in her past -- or lurking in the future. That is why she was chosen.

The Republican Party has reached the end of the road, and Palin is the No Exit sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
70. I won't call her a bimbo
but I will call her dim and unqualified, just like I would call Pawlenty dim and unqualified. And I do think that it's strange that he picked her when there are other qualified Republican women who do not undercut his message...it seems like pandering and it is so shitty that the media would have been all over Sebellius as being a "token" pick if Obama picked her over Hillary, while they are not batting an eyelash at the Palin pick and are already making "Joe Biden can't attack her because she is a woman" excuses...that's the real sexism that bothers me.. bleh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
79. What You Said
:thumbsup: :hi: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
71. It has to do with a bunch of callous men who want their women to
be barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen and who cannot differentiate from a woman who has proved herself at 60 and one who is still an inexperiened half-child at 44.

Hillary is a woman who served at her husband's side as first lady for 8 years. The Republicans think that Palin, who has 12 years of municipal experience (where she managed the town along with a city of council of 6 members) in a town with a population of 6,815. You've got to be kidding. The Republicans are the sexists. A pretty face and 18 months as governor ridicules all the women in this country who have worked hard to achieve professional stature and earned the right to lead the country. Palin is a nice woman, I'm sure, but putting her up as VP is an insult to American women and to the country. We can do better. We women do better than Sarah Palin, admirable as she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
72. Oh geez, not again. A negative comment on a female is NOT sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. Yes, AGAIN. Because some people seem to like pretending that the huge number of sexist comments
don't exist and instead pretend that the objections are about merely negative comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. Are you really that dense, or just pretending to be stupid?
There's at least 3 OPs questioning Palin's qualifications as a mother, not VP, many have called her a Bimbo and a Witch(double insult there for Wiccans on this board), and many question her qualifications BECAUSE she's a woman, not even mentioning her experience. Frankly, DU really tops itself in the social conservative Olympics, hell, it rivals Free Republic in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
76. Some of it may be troll induced. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
78. It has to do with Gender because that is WHY she was picked
They overlooked experience and judgement and picked her because she is young by comparison and has a vagina. She is in no way qualified to be President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
81. Links?
I've been here all day (vacation days are wonderful) and I haven't anything I would consider sexist. Please provide links to actually sexist comments that have been made.

She's unqualified to be Vice President, especially to a person who is so close to death as McCain is. She's unqualified to be much of anything and it's NOT sexist to call them out on it.

Women are NOT interchangeable and this entire thing was McCain's attempt to show how little respect he does have for women. If we say any of these things, it is NOT sexist. She's a Right Wing, fundamentalist, corporatist, animal killing woman who has very likely abused her power as the governor of Alaska. None of that is sexist.

It's just true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
82. She was picked only because of her gender.
A man with her lack of experience would never have been picked.

So, who's sexist? I say it's McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC