|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:48 PM Original message |
There is a lot of sexist bullshit being throw on these threads because of mccain's VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. we are different than the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. she has no judgement or experience...his choice is sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. It's patronizing on his part, for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. That is a valid point, but some of the remarks on DU are pretty bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. you can bet mccain made his decision BECAUSE she's a woman...not because she's a leading politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM Original message |
Your point is valid and NOT sexist. That is not what I was referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
65. i must be naive, i don't even know what that means! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. She's a woman. Calling her a woman is not sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. That is NOT what I am saying, but if you have seen some of the posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Calling her a "brood mare" is, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
40. Calling her a bimbo is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. when you act bimbo-like you will be called a bimbo.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. She may not be a feminist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
84. Yep. I haven't seen that one, but yes in this case it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. sorry to disagree, but if she weren't a woman, she wouldn't have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. That logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. That is NOT what I am saying, references like VPILF, and other posts like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
49. So what, we've talked about Obama's sex appeal before.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #49 |
68. Bingo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't like the "she should stay home because she has kids" posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
50. Unless it's calling out fundie hypocritical nonsense, then agreed..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
66. They are talking about her going back to work after 3 days after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. Agreed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. This isn't a feminist forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
47. Yes but there is a difference between supporting and policing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. So then you agree with references like VPILF. You think that is a good position to take, huh!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. VPILF. ROTFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Want to watch us lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Lighten up, Francis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. whatever /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. That's pretty much what I was aiming for. Apparently the irony was lost on some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. DU is an irony-free zone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. I used to think it was only Republicans who were irony-challenged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EatTacos (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. VPILF, LOL, she is easy on the eyes, I have to say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. She's a bit too Katherine-Harris-y for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EatTacos (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. It never occured to me to even compare the two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Have you been to the site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Nope, didn't even know it existed /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. I may not ..but I don't think it's your place or anyone else's place to police the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. OK. Here is a major problem with Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Thank you, THAT IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT, NOT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwlauren35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
83. Yeah, right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
34. I would have thought ALL democrats are feminist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glancingthefuture (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
60. you are right. To be otherwise is to be undemocratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. All democrats are feminists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glancingthefuture (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #63 |
73. spot on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
74. Well that's painfully obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jobama Biden (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. And so it begins... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. You are right /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
75. And look who opened it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. He's using her as an inexperienced pawn, nothing more. Cheapens the feminist movement. Plus, she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
20. omg. here we go again. Can someone compile a list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. Referring to an opponent in a sexual degrading way, how is that for starters /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. she is under investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. BULLSHIT. This is dirty pandering politics at its worst. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. I am not referring TO THAT, I am referring to sexual references about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. agreed with you there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. I should have made it clearer what I meant in the start thread, thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
24. Sad to say, I'm not surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAnotherGen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
27. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
38. Picking topless Palin IS the sexist insult. Pointing out that she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cwydro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
42. Yep. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
43. The media is telling this is a whole new game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. It speak volums about McCain, young, pretty and low on experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
58. Oh, great. A PUMA member weighs in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eshfemme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
59. Yes, there are some gender-coded insults that should be avoided but telling it like it is shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madura (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. dupe-deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madura (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
62. there is more sexist bullshit in 4 hours here against Palin than in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
64. It also has to do with her hypocrisy. She claims to put family values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
67. But his pick is purely a gender pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
69. I'm a woman. The choice of Palin reminds me of that old joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
70. I won't call her a bimbo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #70 |
79. What You Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
71. It has to do with a bunch of callous men who want their women to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
72. Oh geez, not again. A negative comment on a female is NOT sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Yes, AGAIN. Because some people seem to like pretending that the huge number of sexist comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. Are you really that dense, or just pretending to be stupid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
76. Some of it may be troll induced. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
78. It has to do with Gender because that is WHY she was picked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
81. Links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
82. She was picked only because of her gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC