Dems should just call her Bridge-To-Nowhere-Palin.

[muntrv]

[Muttocracy]

1. 'cept they're saying she fought that project. nt

[JackBeck]

5. After supporting it in 2006. n/t

[Muttocracy]

9. well, then. :)

[JackBeck]

14. Interesting development, no?

Haven't we learned over the past few decades not to take Republicans at their word?

;-)

[lonestarnot]

18. Every time their lips are move'n they be lining out on a lie.

[lonestarnot]

6. 2006 she supported that fucking bridge to nowhere! She's a fucking liar and you expected

something different? Let's watch the motherfucker jump off it now! :woohoo:

[Bucky]

2. She says she refused the funds for it.

Double check your facts before pursuing that line of attack. It may be something that can be easily turned around to make Dems look ignorant.

[lonestarnot]

7. You better fucking double check yours. Anchorage Daily News

[Bucky]

20. Thank you for turning my friendly caveat into a personal insult

It's nice we can have a forum where Democrats can work out their hostility like this.

Just remember, it's my turn to recklessly fly off the handle without provocation next.

[lonestarnot]

23. Bucky

reread what you wrote to that poster and then come back and appologize unless you edited already. hmmmmf. fact checker indeed.

[Bucky]

31. I said "check your facts" and "it may be turned around on us" Fairly neutral statements.

I didn't even use the word "you" in my post. You on the other hand cussed at me.

I said:
"Double check your facts before pursuing that line of attack."
That's being nonjudgmental, friendly and helpful.

You said:
"You better fucking double check yours." -- a decidedly more hostile tone.

I even gave a reason for my caveat:
"It may be something that can be easily turned around to make Dems look ignorant."
Notice a distinct lack of fucks in my comments. It's called common decency and civility. Learn it.

[lonestarnot]

34. What?

Trying to discredit the poster "you" implied. Fuck is my word. You aren't special. I'm not hostile, I've just been in a constant state of pissed for 7 years and 6 months. Dems are never ignorant soooooooooooooooooo, now what?

[JackBeck]

8. Anchorage Daily News on October 22, 2006, during the race for the governor's seat (via Nexis):

"Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?

Yes. I would like to see Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now--while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."

[Greg K]

10. She was for it before she was against it.

5. Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?

Yes. I would like to see Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now--while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/29/did-palin-really-fight-the-bridge-to-nowhere.aspx

[muntrv]

12. She was for it before she was against it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3881380

[PM7nj]

3. I think she was actually responsible for killing that project though. nt

[lonestarnot]

11. When after the news it went to no fucking where? ROFLMAO.

Or was it that too many mooses were hiding under it and she wanted some fucking soup?

[greguganus]

16. well fuckity fuck fuck fuck. n/t

[lonestarnot]

17. And fuck her some more!

[Heather MC]

22. Did she give the money back?

:rofl:

[Riverman]

4. Bill Clinton talked of the "Bridge to the Future" in 2000, How

about calling the McSame campaign the "Bridge to the Past" or the "Campaign to Nowhere"

[speedoo]

13. She was for it before she was against it.

I suspect she flip flopped when Stevens got into trouble.

[johnnydrama]

15. it's actually worse

I believe what she was against was Alaska paying for it. She wanted the US taxpayers to pay for it.

[lonestarnot]

19. ROFLMAO! AGAIN!

:applause:

[BlueIdaho]

21. According to reports...

2006 - when asked about the bridge her response was:

"Yes. I would like to see Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now--while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."

2007 - after bad funding news from Washington DC she said:

"Despite the work of our congressional delegation, we are about $329 million short of full funding for the bridge project, and it's clear that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island."

She's not against the bridge, she's only against Alaska having to foot the bill for it. Hearing the answer to their request for cash was "no dice" she decided this project wasn't as important as she once thought it was.

[lonestarnot]

24. Tee hee OMG Tee hee my ass ROFLMFAO!

:rofl:

[lonestarnot]

25. Sorry don't know what happened here.

:rofl:

[lonestarnot]

26. or here

:rofl:

[lonestarnot]

27. this thread apparently spontaneously regenerates posts.

:rofl:

[BlueIdaho]

35. Meds not working?

Have a nice day.

[lonestarnot]

37. Boy you jumped on that in a hurry. I don't take meds, but since that was your

first reaction, how's YOUR pills?

[JoFerret]

36. Degenerate posts

would be an accurate description.

[lonestarnot]

38. And another who apparently doesn't like the truth of the matter.

[JoFerret]

39. No. I don't like foul mouths and abuse

You have a problem with that?

[JoFerret]

28. Wrong

.

[lonestarnot]

29. Oh boy a 25 percenter! Woohoo!

:rofl:

[JoFerret]

30. What is that supposed to mean? n/t

[spanone]

32. she brought it up today to diffuse it...but she lied

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3881380

[lonestarnot]

33. So that's what someone over in GD was talking about some Rovian shit about owning it first.

and I told them I didn't speak Rovian. Thanks spanone! :hi: