Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't have a probelm with Palin having 5 kids and running for any office she wants. But...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:13 PM
Original message
I don't have a probelm with Palin having 5 kids and running for any office she wants. But...
I have a huge problem with here running for higher office with a Kid with Down's syndrome.

That baby is 6 months old and needs parents close by as much as possible.

I would apply the same rule to either parent for the first three years of life. If I had a special needs kids... I would reprioritize my life to accomodate that child. and the needs of my spouse. I would find a job where I could work from home or have a short commute.


Like Michelle Obama saud Nothing should be more central to your life than raising your kids.

I absolutely applaud Sara Palin's decision to have this child. I cant imagine the heartbreak and the coming challenges the Palins face. But I am astounded that she would devalue the importance of "Being there" for her child for a job that would reuire so much of her attention and so much more should McCain not be able to complete his term.

How can a party who espouse family values even aske her to serve? Haw can a mom do this to her family?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. To begin with, how could she return to work three days after the baby is born?
To whom would you entrust a special child like that so quickly? I didn't feel the LOVE from her toward her kids as you do from Obama and Biden.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just don't go there. How do you know? Go after her political stances. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. If we treat her with kid gloves isn't that sexism as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sisaruus Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. sex discrimination?
You are setting the women's movement back 40 years. I was part of the feminist wave that fought against employment discrimination - including discrimination based on pregnancy, possible pregnancy, and motherhood. Ad I recall that the governor of my state a few years back had a child with Downs and no one questioned his ability to do his job or, conversely, his commitment to his child. The woman has a right, a basic and legally protected right, to both pursue a career and be a parent. Find a valid reason to attack her candidacy, one that doesn't make you more right-wing than the republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. To treat her differently that one would treat a male in her position is the definition of sexism.
I'm sorry if you think otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. One of her political stances is how pro-life she is.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:45 PM by LittleClarkie
As I said in another thread:

"It shouldn't be any of my business how she wants to raise her family, but does it strike anyone else as odd that the mother of a special needs baby who talks about what a gift that child is and about the challenge of having such a child, and who belongs to a party that emphasizes family values, is running for a job that will likely not give her much time with this gift of a child?

I've heard it said that she's commented that this is the sort of child that others would probably abort. So her choice of having this child is used politically, and as a way to put down others who might make a different choice. How fair is that though, considering her resources. Would more women consider giving birth to a special needs child if they knew they had the resources and the support that this woman will likely have?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I just don't see how she physically COULD go back to the office three days after.
Bleeding, engorged breasts, sore, no sleep - OMG. I would die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. It REALLY varies according to everybody and what # kid it is, etc.
I know someone who was gardening the next day. You just can't tell.

Giving birth is a crapshoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well she has had five kids.
and labor does get easier. Besides it may well have been mostly work from home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Easy...if one didn't actually give birth
it's her daughter's kid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VenusRising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Keith Olbermann mentioned the baby was 4 months premature.
It's really a weird situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. That's not possible....
If she announced her pregnancy during her seventh month, then Palin did not give birth four months early. Four months early would be about when my son was born - at 24 weeks or about at the six month mark. And Down Syndrome would be the least of the family's concern were the baby born that early... Olbermann must have been given bad information to report that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VenusRising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. I'm sure that he will make a correction on Monday if that's so.
Otherwise, this story is getting more and more unbelievable. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. Really! That and it just occurred to me that he may have meant to say 4 weeks...
And accidentally said months instead and just didn't catch the mistake while on-air... I'd be willing to bet that's what he meant to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then Obama should not have spent the past two years barely at home....
Politicians ignore their kids. You can't be prez or vice prez and a steady presence in your kids' lives.

Dodd ran with small kids.

JFK ran with small kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No. there is a huge difference woth DS Kids.
There is also a difference between making the desision to run in long consultation with your spouse and opting to run with just two days notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatsDogsBabies Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Obama's kids are old enough to understand that they
have a father and are able to maintain a relationship with him even if he is on the road. Newborns have none of this awareness. Newborns don't know where they end and another person begins, nor do they have any memory. You can't tell a newborn "Daddy will be home tomorrow." Newborns need their needs taken care of 24/7 so that when they get a little older and turn into little people, they are capable of having sane, fulfilling relationships. Why are some so seemingly anti-parenting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. The Obamas arranged for Michelle's mother to take care of the
kids on the nights neither Barack nor Michelle could be home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. None of his kids have special needs. He hasn't used then as proof of some pro-life morality
or passed judgment on people who may have made other choices than his.

It's how she's used the birth politically, and it's the hypocrisy. That's the point. Not whether or not she has kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've seen a number of posts on this general theme
My opinion is it stinks.

Boil down all the nicey-nice qualifications and this is the translation: a woman can't properly attend to family and career at the same time.

Also, regarding the heartbreak you're sure lies ahead, it appears Palin herself sees it quite differently.

We are going to lose a lot of independent voters if we start peddling this antifeminist, judgmental b.s. It's hypocrisy, plain and simple. Let's turn attention back to McLame's plans for the U.S. where it rightly belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It DOES stink.
FDR: We had rotten kids!
ER: The Churchill kids were worse...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. This is not a gender issue ...it is a parenting issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree with that, but it's rarely placed on men. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I am a guy and I would quit my well paying job the puts me on the road
three weeks outr of four and find something else close to home If we had a kids with Down's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I respect that and I know men that got out of the navy because they...
didn't want to miss their kids growing up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I see...so apparently Mr. Palin is incapable of being a full partner in the parenting
That's what it sounds like to me.

I'm not speaking against you, I'm saying this kind of hypocrisy has no place in our constellation of values...values that many have sacrificed long and hard to bring to general acceptance.

It's political poison. Put the bottle down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. He's not running for vp and isn't using the birth of his child
as some sort of pro-life badge of honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I agree with your post.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. i agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. What I see boiled down is that the woman is a raging hypocrite
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:55 PM by LittleClarkie
who hold up the birth of a special needs child as some sort of pro-life badge of honor, talking about the gifts and challenges of having such a child, and then will be handing over the care of such a child to someone else.

How many people can afford the resources that she has at her disposal? Who is she do hold up her choice as being better than theirs when she's not even going to be the one raising the child half the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. tells you something about a mother who would essentially abandon a child
to go campaigning around the country for two months.

Either McCain assured her that he'd lose and she wouldn't have to actually worry about serving, and she can raise her profile for a possible later-run...

...or she's just as egotistical and power-driven as people accuse Hillary Clinton of being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I can't believe what I'm reading. Obama and McCain are egotistical and power-driven too.
To run for president you HAVE to be.

FDR: No comment.
ER: Weeeellll....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. of course they are...but they also RAN for president
Palin just accepted a job offer, and all it entails. She wants all the glory without actually having to do the hard work for it - aside from giving up time with her developmentally disabled newborn (of course, she might not consider that hard work either).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. That baby will have GREAT healthcare if she wins....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. The baby will have GREAT healthcare if Obama wins too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I do find it interesting and ironic....
...that some of us who would argue that Bill Clinton's personal life had nothing to do with his public life....would (out of the other side of one's mouth)argue that a mother of a special needs child should not run for VP.

This is insulting to women. It is insulting especially to mothers. And even more insulting to mothers of special needs children.

What was it that transformed some of us to the wrong side of these issues?

Jeez. Palin's weaknesses as a VP candidate are numerous. Why do we even feel the need to go here?

I am glad as hell she is the pick. McCain blew it big time. No longer can he use experience as an issue against Obama. Obama piced biden, and who did McCain pick to be a 72 year old heart-beat away from the presidency....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. i'm not saying she shouldn't be able to run
she's free to be as neglectful and selfish as she wants to be, I just think it reflects poorly upon her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
68. Well and succinctly said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's only 66 days.
she probably doesn't expect to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holiday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. you know why she is able to do this
because the child is not hers.

it sounds too fishy to me. wasn't it premature as well? Why would she fly in airplane back to Alaska? Are there any pregnant pics of her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riverman Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:28 PM
Original message
Family Values! Hey Sarah, your new born baby has Downs Syndrome!
And you have four other chldren. Maybe the baby needs you at home! How selfish of you to pursue an unneeded political career while your children sit at home. Where are the Family Values Republicans? One must assume with your husband working jobs in the North Slope oil fields and on fishing boats that he is not home much. Who is raising your children? Are going to grow up being traumatized by the lack of a Mom and Dad at home, and then get into drugs and crimminal activity and thus a burden on society? Are the tax-payers going to have to pay for your lack of parenting while you were out building your political career? What king of mother are you, for God's sake?

Apparently, McShame doesn't care about your children either! What the hell is the matter with you people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Applepie Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. My heart aches for this child
I have worked caring for children for working mothers. I know that I give them wonderful care but I know that it is not the care the mother can give. I believe that children need their mother. When I heard that she had an infant I was appalled that she would consider VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Typical
That's what I thought...you have nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Spoken like someone with incontrovertible proof
You must lead an interesting life...when you get called on bullshit, people have to blow you.

Maybe you'll wise up when you turn 17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. Why? How different is a Downs Syndrome child at 6 months than a typical child at six months?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
51. A typical child she wouldn't be holding up as evidence of her pro-life morality
She has talked about how this is the sort of child that others would have aborted. Ah, but others don't have the resources she does, do they. And as a Conservative, she's not exactly in favor of the social services that would give them the resources.

She's holding up this child politically, and she's likely not even going to be around to experience the challenges and the gift that having such a child brings. Nice family values, Palin.

It's the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
44. self delete: replied to wrong post...my apologies
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:56 PM by mitchum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. As OP I alerted on the real troll
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:59 PM by Perky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
49. Quit lowering the sexism bar -
- I cannot believe the 17th century sexist threads I'm seeing here tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. This has nothing to do with gender as I have said in other subthreads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Applying different standards to a woman than to a man is sexism.
It has everything to do with gender as this would not have been a topic had her husband been the VP nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. It woulod have for me...... read my other posts.
It has everything to with proper parneting.. Both parents need to be fully present when you have a kid with DS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #53
71. Gimme a break
I think I know a littlme more about my motivations in the OP than you do. I would feel exactly the same if Obama had an infant with Downs. I would be opposed to him launching a bid. On the other hand. If Palin had a healthy infant.....I would not even raise the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
52. Why in the hell was post 42 removed? I didn't call Dreamer Tatum a troll...
or request that he blow me in that one.

I just listed some curious facts about Palin's "pregnancy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. My shocking paternity conjectures, all gone!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I wasn't shocked...
but I really really like the lurid

ms mitchum says that words such as "taboo", "ligature", and "drifter" are like catnip to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
54. Please stop.
A woman, just like a man, has the right to pursue any career he or she pleases regardless of whether they have children. She has a husband, and he can look after the kids, if it comes to that; or they can hire someone to help.

I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. A Down syndrome child makes this different.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:36 PM by Tennessee Gal
And I find no evidence that either parent in this case is making any special committment to the care of this child.

It is hypocritical of them to hold up this child as an example of their pro-life stance but make no statement on how they intend to care for the special needs of this child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. precisely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. You stand in judgment
yet they are the parents.

You didn't even know Palin's name yesterday and now today you "find no evidence that either parent in this case is making any special committment to the care of this child."

Something tells me your investigation was not exhaustive.

What you're really saying is a woman can't actually attend to both her family and her career, and that strangers should sit in judgment of a woman's family choices.

If this kind of hypocrisy doesn't go against every progressive fiber of our being, then I might as well join the John Birch Society. Meanwhile, outside the confines of DU, this kind of meme is going to cost us hard among independents, who actually think parties should walk the walk if they talk the talk.

Time to put this U-shaped pistol down, peeps, and turn the focus back on McSame's policies, where we don't have to be hypocrites to be effective critics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. umm Escuse me...but I knew Sare Paalins name and her creditentials and about he pregancy two month
ago,

And I amt saying word one about her gender. it is about being a parent for a kid with special needs.

If she had five kids and all were finre. I would not even raise the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. My post was not directed to you, so no "excuse me" is necessary
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:09 PM by Psephos
Meanwhile, I do not enjoy the direction of this thread. If there's anything I can't stand it's judgmental repugs pontificating about how other people should run their families. How disconcerting to find some of a similar ilk among our own numbers here.

I'm interested in winning this election in November. Self-appointed judges of a woman's family priorities are not going to help that cause.

PS it's Sarah Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. It is not about being a woman it it about being a parent with a down's kid
Male or female. It has to reprioritize your life or you ar a lousy parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. Have you raised a child with incredible challenges? I have. I
am all for working mothers; I am one myself. But I agree: the needs of the child should come first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. She's got a husband. She's been called to duty just as he has been in the past.
His turn to stay home with the kids. Being offered Vice - Prez is a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. As a single parent with one child with special needs, and one
child without special needs, I can tell you that one parent for two kids in this situation is not enough. The child without needs gets burned because of the extreme needs of the other child. To have five children and only one parent who can really contribute.....I feel sorry for the kids. Though, of course, even more than that, I feel sorry for all of us. McCain winning is scary enough. The thought of someone becoming President who has not even thought about Iraq is terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam kane Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
73. 20 million in debt--her legacy as mayor
Do we want this kind of governance on the federal level?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC