About Palin's baby: 1 she has to turn over medical records. 2. she has to turn over financials

[thunder rising]

That's why Pres nominees pick vetted VPs

[rwheeler31]

1. Who vetted her?

[thunder rising]

3. Nobody ... it's time for the MEDIA to do it's job.

[librechik]

6. one of the O'Donnell girls was gushing over her and her thorough vetting on MSNBC

so they really really lie alll the time, k? Even bout that and to their own slavish press

[dchill]

15. That would be Kelly O'Donnell...

who has been Stockholm-Syndromed by the Straight-Talk Express from the get-go.

[Thrill]

2. What about her baby?

What do you mean. Is there something wrong?

[thunder rising]

4. People are squaking that it might be her 17 yr old daughter's.

[sfam]

16. If that's true, I'd just assume they keep it hidden...we really don't want to go there...

Seriously, why on earth would we want to resort to that crap? If this is true, and she decided to take this on for her daughter, that really sounds like a private issue that I want no part of, nor do I want the national debate to end up talking about whether I can ever get better health care.

Sorry, no thank you.

[vaberella]

23. If the media finds out. Then let it run with it. However I don't want the Obama camp related to it.

n/t

[sfam]

28. I would actually pay to help keep this story covered. We want no part of this...truly

Why would we? Again, the MSM can only cover one story at once. Do you really want Obama to get elected that way? That pretty much screws his mandate, and everyone will say he got elected due to tawdry details in the campaign. Business as usual, baby. Good luck on making a change in Washington with that sort of mandate.

FAR FAR better would be for the American people to reject McCain and his tactics. That WOULD lead to a mandate to do things differently.

[pop goes the weasel]

17. What if he is?

I know, have known all my life, people who "adopt" the babies of their teens and raise them as their own children. There is nothing nefarious or underhanded about it, but there is definitely something slimy about dragging children's parentage through the mud. So can we just not go there? There is enough to detest about Palin that we can certainly leave her kids out of it.

(edited to change pronoun)

[Thrill]

20. I don't know. If it helps or hurts her. It would show she is a liar. But she can easily

claim she just refused to let her daughter have an abortion. I would leave it alone. Palin is irrelevant. Just keep reminding people she and McCain are just like Bush. Its the winner.

[Lisa0825]

5. Rumor is it's cover up and that it was her teen daughter who had the baby.nt

[grasswire]

7. some people think it's not her baby...

....but her daughter's, done thus to circumvent insurance rules.

[Colobo]

9. I would love this to be true...

[sfam]

18. REALLY??? Think about what you're saying...

You really want the national debate to go through all this salacious crap for the next two months? Tell me, what kind of mandate will that be giving Obama to make the changes he wants. Wouldn't it be FAR better if people voted for him based on the need to change our country?

[WinkyDink]

10. Because the family is so POOR? Bwahahahaha!

[Beausoir]

11. The sicko brigade here thinks they are on to a major gynecological scoop!

All sort of discussions of Palin's uterine secretions going on.

Kooks and loons and nuts.

[LongDistanceRunner]

14. why do PUMAs try to snuff out McCain's fires??

[marshall]

12. The rumor mill is buzzing that the baby is her daughter's child and not hers

I think it's a wrong move to take--as disgusting as the right wing hallucination that Chelsea is Webster Hubbell's child or that Bill Clinton fathered a child with a black prostitute. We need to meet them on the issues, not tabloid trash.

[vaberella]

25. Well we all know Obama won't touch this with a ten foot pole. So it's moot. n/t

[WinkyDink]

8. Nonsense.

[trudyco]

19. Are there any pix to put this to rest - around her preggers time?

I still say she was recklessly endangering her child by flying back to AK from TX when she supposedly had her water break.Why should we trust her with our country? This was just crazy. She shouldn't have been on the trip. She had to know she was high risk.

I think her behavior from that time is a talking point. This shows really, really poor judgment. And poor mothering for that matter.

Now if it ends up it wasn't hers and she's covering up, well that's another valid point.
There have to be pix of her just before this birth and pix of her in previous pregnancies. Let's compare.

[grasswire]

21. supposedly at six months

[LongDistanceRunner]

22. and Palin did not reveal her 'Pregnancy' until she was '7 months pregnant'

Awfully strange for an elected official, don't you think?

[Boz]

29. Heres a more telling picture from February, Who is pregnant in this picture

Source:
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/339587.html

[CK_John]

13. There is no legal requirements to turn anything over. It may be good politics to vet. n/t

[MichiganVote]

24. So let's call the National Enquirer. Afterall they LOVED going after Edwards.

[vaberella]

26. That they did. Those sickos wouldn't let this go. n/t

[RagAss]

27. From my brain to your keyboard !!!