whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:43 PM
Original message |
Um... about the "sexist palin threads" |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:05 PM by ResetButton
PALIN IS THE FUCKING ENEMY! DESTROY HER!
BTW, nobody is calling women sexist for going after McCain. Why is this different?
EDIT: Okay I get it, you all think I'm endorsing anything shitty that was said about palin in other posts. That's not what I was aiming to do.
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So any and all means is not only necessary, but moral as well? |
|
What the fuck is the point of all this shit if we act like THEM! For fuck's sake! Have some respect for yourself, at the very least, even if you can't respect your "enemies".
|
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. It's not about destroying "her" |
|
It's about debunking the ideas she has and pointing out hypocrisy, with a blind eye to whatever sex, skin color, toothbrushing habits, whatever, that the hypocrite has.
Today, we've been talking about the person.
Is it misogynistic that she has no experience? That's not because she is a woman--it is because she has no experience.
That she is trying to come off as someone who has family values but is willing to let a newborn stay with a nanny? That is not misogynistic--it is pointing out utter hypocrisy.
That she is pro-life but promotes the senseless, cruel, aerial killing of wolves and bears? Check the hypocrisy note above.
That she has used her position to bully her brother-in-law and is in a scandal? And that has to do with her being a woman . . . how?
That she wants the world to believe she is smart enough to be vice president and at the same time believes that creationism should be taught in schools? How does misogyny have any relation to this anti-constitutional idea?
It doesn't have to do with "the woman"--it has to do with the actions of "the person."
|
shimmergal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:46 PM by shimmergal
being willing to "let a newborn stay with a nanny" _is_ misogynist. I've never seen a man criticized for hiring a nanny if that was necessary for him to do his job.
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Then I guess it's okay for the freepers to fling N words at Obama |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Where the fuck did I say or insinuate that? |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:49 PM by ResetButton
I'm just saying when it comes to our republican opponents, it's gloves off. That's sure the hell how they're gonna play it.
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Your very post insinuates that. |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 PM by Chovexani
Everything's fair game when dealing with "the enemy", after all. Right?
What you and your fellow keyboard warriors are advocating is nothing less than the wholesale adoption of the Southern Strategy. It was no less offensive when the Repukes did it on race, and anyone embracing this idea in the name of "getting even" with foes or "winning" is a disgrace to this party. But I guess y'all had stomach aches and stayed home that day in kindergarten when we had that lesson that how you win is more important than winning.
Do you motherfuckers not understand there are women in this party? Women that pay attention? Women who are not nearly so stupid as to believe that your deep-seated misogyny is only reserved for women on the other side of the aisle?
Really, I promise you that we are not that stupid.
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. Bullshit! You're the sexist, I don't give a rat's ass about her gender. All I see is republican. |
|
Is it sexist for women to pound McCain?
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Attacking the person calling them on their bigotry as the "real" bigot.
My gods, I just won fauxgressive white hetero male bingo! :party:
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. Where in this post did I make a bigoted statement? |
|
It's all your projection.
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
38. You're probably not aware that some people collect memberships in multiple... |
|
subcultures in order to always have multiple residences from which to be aggrieved. And to seem more interesting. Don't sweat it.
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:52 PM
Original message |
Yes. It points out their Neanderthalism |
|
With apologies to Neanderthals.
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:54 PM
Original message |
And "our side" using misogyny to win does the same. |
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
13. See my post below or above wherever n/t |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:55 PM by texastoast
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
The issues in your post are not an example of misogyny. Your post is what we SHOULD be focused on, because the issues you brought up in it are entirely legitimate ones to be attacking her on.
Where the misogyny lies is the repeated "MILF" horseshit, attacking her teenage daughter, and attacking her for daring to work outside the home. It's this 1950s sexist bullshit being propagated under the guise of "it's about the hypocrisy" and "she's the enemy".
No thought--none WHATSOEVER--is ever given to the fact that using sexist attacks against one woman is using sexist attacks against ALL women.
Because, you know? I and a lot of other women have heard a lot of the same misogynist bullshit directed towards us over various choices we've made in our lives and it stinks and is awful no matter what the reason is.
And people wonder why there are PUMAs. This kind of horseshit is what makes PUMAs.
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
43. Really now? I was under the impression that gop funding $$$$ was what made PUMAs |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If she can't stand up and take a hit like a man... |
|
she needs to get out of the goddamn game. It really is that simple.
|
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
24. Now that's pretty sexist |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
31. No,saying "misogyny is in the blackened eye of the beholder" would be sexist |
|
Granted, it is also darkly witty, but still probably sexist
Are you a disruptor?
|
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
37. Not tonight particularly |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
40. Well, that's two of us |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:13 PM by mitchum
:)
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. God help me, I'm agreeing with Solon--but who died and left you in charge of stifling opinion? nt |
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 09:53 PM by texastoast
|
JohnnyLib2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Here's the definition of sexism. Notice any lately? |
|
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This sex·ism Audio Help /ˈsɛksɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles. 2. discrimination or devaluation based on a person's sex, as in restricted job opportunities; esp., such discrimination directed against women.
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
JohnnyLib2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
21. My response was to your OP, re: "sexist.....threads" |
|
The count on those is way up today.
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
34. Well,I DO want to restrict Palin's job opportunities; I don't want her anywhere near the Oval Office |
JohnnyLib2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
8. always attack. always smear. leave no stone unthrown |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Wow, I don't get it... Who smeared her? |
|
I have a feeling you'll change your mind when she starts spewing grade AAA republican poison.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. I was being sincere and agreeing with you. HEAVE THE MUD AT HER |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Bullshit. I want no part of freeper and puke tactics. |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. WTF? So I say destroy the republican enemy and that means I'm advocating "freeper tactics" |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
25. Well you said, do anything to destroy the enemy right? |
|
So using sexist smears against her is okay in your book?
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
36. I didn't say "do anything" n/t |
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Show me where we have been attacking Palin's sex. Link up some threads where DU'ers are saying that she sucks because she's a woman.
|
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Questioning her motherhood and her choices as a mother? Sexist. |
|
Saying 'let's see some naked pics' or calling her a bimbo? Sexist 'She can take ten inches'? Sexist.
|
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
When she puts rants her mouth with traditional "family values." If you are going to be Mrs. Mom, then get yourself to the house and bake some cookies and be home every day with the kids. I as a feminist will fight for her right to do so.
But don't come at me and say you are Ms. Mom ("I'm just a hockey mom") and have a nanny to take care of your kids every day. Just say that you are a working mother with uncontained ambition and get it the hell over with. THAT I can stomach.
If you see some threads with language like bimbo and other untoward stuff, you should post them for me.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
16. She needs to be defeated. Period. |
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
18. dumbest post i have seen all day |
|
no one is saying not to attack pallin. people are staying not to attack her in misogynistic ways
if you cant tell the difference between yourself and your enemy, why bother trying to win
is mccain being attacked in any misandrist way?
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. Please point out the "misogynistic" part of my post? |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:00 PM by ResetButton
That is if you can
|
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
28. i didnt say your post was sexist just that no one is saying you cannot attack palin |
|
just dont attack her in reasons based in sexism
|
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-30-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
46. i am aware that you dont get it. nt |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
42. She's the one who participated in a BEAUTY PAGEANT; apparently she has no problem with sexism... |
kwenu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-29-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
45. I'm with you. DESTROY HER!!! She's terrible and that has nothing to do with her gender. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |