Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Convention bumps (1964-2004)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Martinucho Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:24 AM
Original message
Convention bumps (1964-2004)
I found a graph that poll junkies may find useful:



Comments please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dontforgetpoland Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the post!

Interesting... I thought Kerry got more of a bounce than that. I wonder which polling firms they accrue their data from and from what timeframe after the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I recall 2004 quite well and it was commented widely on DU that Kerry got very little bounce
because I think he announced Edwards so early and it was kind of an anti-climactic convention with few red meat attacks on Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martinucho Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the blog where I found it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Except for McGovern , our smallest bump was the Kerry/
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:33 AM by PaulHo
/Edwards ,' Obama as keynoter' convention.

We should have used that chance to define the unspeakable. But party bigwigs said "don't make waves". Result: a snoozefest.

Who's gonna define the opposition except our own spokespeople? On my list of things I'll never understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton getting a good bump in 1992 did occur before his win, but Carter = Reagan in
convention bumps in 1980, but Carter did not win. So, bumps don't predict victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dontforgetpoland Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Clinton bump was helped when Ross Perot, who was leading at the time, decided to drop out.

Most of these voter went to Clinton and a lot remained after Perot changed his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC