Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems need to stop attacking Palins inexperience

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:30 AM
Original message
Dems need to stop attacking Palins inexperience
That's a trap.

We don't need a "lack of experience" card to attack McCain. All we need is to keep pointing out that McCain is McCain, and that we don't need four more years of Republican malfeasance.

The "experience card" was McCain's to play against Obama. In fact, it was all McCain had, IMO. THIS is the only place where Palin's lack of experience come in play--it disables McCain's only argument.

We needn't criticize Palin's lack of experience, unless we're defending against McCain's only line of attack against Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. You might as well be talking to a wall, but you're right.
When your opponent has a giant polling advantage on an issue that's not the issue to dwell on.

Obama doesn't gain from a national debate about who is qualified to be commander in chief because McCain has a big advantage on that narrow question. It's pretty much his ONLY polling advantage on any issue. (Terrorism and Iraq are subsets of the CIC question.) And that was doubtless considered when the picked Palin... that she would cause a renewed discussion of "who you trust to be CIC"

Since Obama will win DESPITE trailing McCain on that one issue it's a silly issue to publicize.

But you will be denounced as a troll just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. I almost always agree with you, but on this, I beg to differ.
I think it's worth pointing out -- in case anybody missed it! -- that this was a reckless, even dangerous decision by McCain.

Comparisons of Palin's "experience" with Obama's are silly. If nothing else, change the word "experience" to "preparation." Start with the fact that Obama has a law degree from Harvard, while Palin has a BS in journalism. HUGE difference!! Obama has years of leadership experience and has worked with national and international issues; Palin has not worked with national and international issues at all, but only a short time in a small (population-wise) state, a small town, and a PTA.

This can certainly cut into McCain's margin as a man of judgment who is best prepared to be CiC. It could be said he made a political decision that puts the nation in jeopardy. And the thought of Palin as CiC should frighten anyone! So why cede all that ground?

I think Palin undermines everything McCain has had going for him. I don't see any reason to fear comparisons of her incredibly lightweight resume with Obama's experience, preparation and knowledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I agree. It's ridiculous that people are comparing the Wasilla City Council to the Illinois
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 11:07 AM by Walter Sobchak
State Senate.

Palin's experience shouldn't be Obama-Biden's main attack. They need to keep up with the "4 more years of the same" line, which has really been hitting home.

But they should also emphasize, subtly, McCain's old age and poor health. People need to realize that Palin is a heartbeat away from the presidency. Some people will be willing to take that risk, but not most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wrong.
'Experience' was McCain's standard.

Using McCain's and his supporter's own words about 'experience' makes it a terrific argument.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But we don't need it. So why use it?
McCain is bad enough just being McCain. And McCain--the top of the ticket--has plenty of experience. So it's really not an issue we need.

The beauty of Palin is that it shuts up McCain. And he's got nothin' else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Except that there are people who are undecided
about whom to vote for and the VP matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't think VP inexperience is really going to help undecideds
I'm not saying that we should never mention it. Palin's Barbie-doll McCain-accessory air is there for all to see.

It just shouldn't be anything near our central attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't think it will be Obama's central attack.
Just part of a coordinated one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. You need to differentiate between what Obama/Biden do
and what we message board posters, bloggers and average citizens do.

I haven't seen Obama/Biden attack her in any way.

I think they will take the high road, as they do, and let the debates be on the issues and let her record (lack there of) speak for itself.

"We" as in DUers, are free to discuss this and everything else about McCain/Palin we like. "We" are not the campaign and you have seen how Obama works, he doesn't focus on the petty, he responds to attacks on himself and he talks about the issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. We need to use whatever it takes and even Republicans are
saying Palin isn't ready to take over if something happens to McCain. You have to point out even the obvious to some people and we can do it without putting her down - after all, it's her experience that is in question and it's obvious she has none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. The biggest card we can play is the utter lack of judgment ...
displayed by McCain in his completely impulsive and borderline arbitrary selection of Palin.

It's the ultimate killer and what we should focus on. McCain's first important "executive decision" was a total flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. This I tend to agree. Keep the focus on McCain.
Here, Palin's inexperience is again a SECONDARY issue.

Keep the focus on McCain. Keep the focus on McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. But you're not getting his point. You have to bring up her
inexperience in order to make the case that McCain has no judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RinaX Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Attack what she's DONE with the experience, not the length itself. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. You're right we don't need to talk it up
but I don't see it being a trap. This is a blatant attempt to pull female voters and that's it, McCain and his team of scumbags led by the prick Schwartz think all women are as stupid as the one's they've been able to land and meet. Because most women are a lot smarter than the average Repuke official it's doomed to failure on that level. The only women who will vote for this ticket are the Stepford wives that always vote for the puke ticket.

Where I think the inexperience issue comes up in our favor is that the republions can no longer say that Obama is unqualified to be President because of his inexperience. What this does open up for us now IMO is the issue of McCain's age, health and overall judgment. None of that can be claimed as untouchable by the press as I think it has been over the past few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Her inexperience can be framed by a question: What makes her ready to be CinC?
I saw some of their surrogates try to answer that one, and they keep bringing up the Alaska National Guard.

Next step - find a former senior member of the Alaska National Guard and have them explain the Governor's role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. You're right. We should use it. Not the other way around.
I know my heading made no sense, but yes, we use the experience card now, taking it away from McCain. It's nothing we need to be on the attack with. I'd attack with the fact that for McCain it was a very risky pick, more style than substance. I'd go so far as to accuse him of rolling over to Bush's handlers, the Rove wing of that party and that he's no maverick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. Agreed
It doesn't matter. If people are going to vote for her on the ticket then they don't care about experience anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Disagree
BA from Idaho in journalism

Runner-Up for Miss Alaska

Sports Commentator on a local news show

Mayor of a town of less than 6,000 (part time job)

Governor 20 months of a state with a population of 680,000


Her lack of education and experience does matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Are you fucking comparing Palin's experience to Obama's?
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:55 AM by thewiseguy
Seriously go educate yourself. The last thing the Dems need is to take advice from folks like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Uh. No I'm not. Apparently, you are?
I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. McCain's desperate Hail Mary pass is about to be intercepted...
Obama, Axelrod and Plouffe know how to deal with this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's not her experience. It's her qualifications!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. why? shes more inexperienced than Obama
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 11:13 AM by iamthebandfanman
why not point that out ? i mean McCains whole campaign has been about how obama has no experience and he does... then he picks someone with even less experience?
shows that even HE THINKS experience doesnt mean shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC