Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Palin pick was designed for Dems to jump on her to make women mad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
truthN08 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:50 AM
Original message
The Palin pick was designed for Dems to jump on her to make women mad
Okay I'm a woman and a mother of 1 daughter.I'm in no way anti-women. I was never a Hillary supporter but yesterday I felt something "primal" for Hillary like how DARE Palin think she should could be VP when she's not qualified and use Hillarys "18 cracks" line. I can be emotional.

Well look at how many people have jumped to Palins defense even on THIS site. Palin was picked because they knew the dems would get mad and offended and pounce on her. They figure if they can make it seem like Palin is being picked on they think it will rally ALL women and that women will want to stick together because a fellow female,a mother is being "picked on" "made fun of" or talked down to.

I don't know exactly what happened with the Hillary thing in the primary but as soon as women started feeling like Hillary was being messed with by the press and whoever else they rallied to Hillary.

Rove and McCain are trying to do the same thing here. They are trying to get everyone all pissed off about this pick so people can call her out and then they can paint her as a victim and people love to protect a victim and that people will forget she isn't qualified they will just vote for this pretty mother of 5. If she cries and says how hard it is to run for office while being a mother to 5 the media will turn her into America's sweetheart and Obama will have a hard time getting coverage. This election is very short.

Obama and his campaign saw how for whatever reason women felt Hillary was getting a raw deal and came to her and they won't let that happen again. I don't think you will hear anything from Obama about Palin and he will just keep running against McCain. This election can NOT be about Palin. The focus has to stay on McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. keep the attacks against McSame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. The palin pick was a cynical outrageous pick that is an insult to women
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:56 AM by still_one
It reveals how mccain and many republicans feel about women



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point, and
I agree. This is still about McCain, and going after Palin is not a good idea for the reasons you stated. I have already seen diehard republicans getting upset over McCains choice of Palin, and some are even saying they will NOT vote for him now. They won't vote for Obama, but will simply stay home.

I think the Obama camp will stay away from Palin, and just keep on hammering McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep--they are dangling her out there like a target, daring people to make
sexist criticisms, so that women will get upset and rally around her the way they did with Hillary. It's awful--the state of politics in this nation has gone into the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. I agree keep the attacks about McCain and his disastrous policies.
Let biden take care of Palin during the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think their plan is backfriing because people are seeing Palin as a political ploy.
A lot more women are actually enraged not only because of Palin's speech, but because of her acceptance of using her gender to get ahead without having the qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. whatever the reason, it was politically motivated and has nothing to do with "Country First"
McCain is putting politics and his career in front of what's best for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Agree, this is an ancillary strategy of the Repubs. We should ignore her.
And focus attacks on McCain and his jugdment for picking her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm in general agreement; I also think there is a racial element. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I agree w/part of your post -
I wasn't a HRC supporter, but I didn't appreciate Palin using the 18M cracks comment, and I now feel unless HRC comes up with a plan of action to discredit Palin, if the Repubs take the WH again, Palin will run for POTUS in 2012, and if she wins, that will be the nail in HRC's future POTUS coffin. JMO.

I agree with your comment about the ppl on this site running to Palin's defense, saying that not to attack her for being a former beauty queen, for being a mom, etc., BUT these same ppl justify their opinion based on "taking the high road." THAT won't win this election. Palin stopped funding to the 'bridge to nowhere', and the Dems are taking off the gloves and taking a detour from "taking the high road that LEADS to nowhere" in this election. Obama/Biden HAVE to do whatever it takes to win this election. Period. McInsane & Co. have clearly used Machiavellian tactics in this election, and they can't be allowed to get away with it unchallenged. Otherwise, we look weak which translates to not being able to effectively confront and deal with opponents on a global scale. JMO.

Since Palin is on tape accusing Hillary of whining during the primaries, and an opponent needing to know what she is getting herself into and what to expect, I hardly think she will whine. Of course, the media will do whatever w/the criticism of her.

Obama will have to focus on McCain, and Biden will have to focus on Palin - one heartbeat away from the Presidency.

The sad thing for me is that I have a family acquaintance who was undecided but leaning towards Obama, but he is now leaning towards McCain BECAUSE of Paulin. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I was a Hillary supporter
and this pick is a slap in the face to her supporters. Palin isn't worthy to breath the same air as Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree w/you 100%! Shows how stoopid the Repugs truly think women are. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. yes... back to McLame. Palin is a attempt to divide us and divert us from him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am going to say this again, Rove had nothing to do with it ...
IMO, this pick is nothing more complicated than McCain being the lunatic he is.

I think Rove knew he REALLY wanted Lieberman, and knew that a Lieberman pick would have just caused the convention to cave in, and worked to block that pick. I think that is the only aspect about this that Rove had any "control" over. I think once he was able to manuver (sp) behind the scenes to block Lieberman, that McCain went COMPLETELY off the reservation on the Palin pick.

Whatever way the Rs and MSM SPIN this thing to protect both McCain and Palin, it was NOT planned in any way shape or form, it was just a sadly broken man making the kinds of decisions he makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I've been thinking this, too.
Rove, bastard that he is, usually makes decisions that make sense from his point of view. This Palin pick does not.

MPK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. And they are mad at me because I told them to shut-up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bring it
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 11:58 AM by kwolf68
She is running for Vice President. If the heats too much get out the kitchen.

Democrats have proven time and again we respect women, we want them to have the same rights and privledges as anyone.

If this were 1919, people like Sarah Palin would be fighting against womens suffrage.

Democrats have no problem with women in positions of power. We damn neard nominated a women to be our Presidential candidate and 24 years ago (24 YEARS ago) we put a women on the national ticket. Welcome to the Party Republicans. How does 'feminism' taste to you now? Oh I am sure in 2036 they'll eventually get around to putting a black man on the ticket, and they'll challenge the Democrats that if you attack this black man you are racist.

Trouble is, it was US, the Democrats who fought for (and would eventually lose the entire South) black men (and women).

So in other words...if Democrats-who HAVE championed the plight of women and blacks-happen to trash a black or a women, it's ALWAYS because of inferior viewpoints and not because of the gender or race. We have PROVEN we don't care about race and gender, WE SUPPORT blacks and women. We fight for legislation freeing them. We have 'earned' the right to thus challenge them.

You Republicans are juxtaposing this sexist, masochistic primacy onto us Democrats because that's what YOU ARE. From the party where war is peace, ignorance is strength, and slavery is freedom comes the feminists are anit-women mantra.

I say bring that shit on. Challenge Sarah Palin's radical viewpoints and do it forcefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. They can attack her if they do it right
But, yes, keep the focus on McSchmuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC