Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin lied about the "bridge to nowhere' again today, that is twice now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 05:45 PM
Original message
Palin lied about the "bridge to nowhere' again today, that is twice now
Just watched the rally in PA and she did it again. These are prepared speeches, not questions that are catching her off guard. She does not need to mention that bridge at all, instead she lies about it for no apparent reason.


She has already been called out on it by Rachel Maddow and still she is spewing this shit. WTF does she think she is doing and how the hell can the McGaffe team let her continue to do it?????


Straight talk express is now the bull shit express



http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/29/did-palin-really-fight-the-bridge-to-nowhere.aspx

*snip*

5. Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?

Yes. I would like to see Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now--while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.



We need to bury this woman, for the good of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats must continually hold her feet to the fire on flat out lies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dems can't give her a pass on this. She's in the big leauges now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. The last thing I want to do is defend her, but wasn't this a state vs. Fed issue?
Her statement in her 'acceptance speech' seemed to indicate that she declined Federal funding and said that Alaska "would build it ourselves."

In that context, she was against Federal funding, not the bridge itself.

Has she changed her position on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. another snip from that link



another snip





Maybe I've missed something, but it sure looks like she was fine with the bridge in principle, never had a problem with the earmarks, bristled at all the mockery, and only gave up on the project when it was clear that federal support wasn't forthcoming. Now, Charles Homans, who knows Alaska well, says Palin's anti-corruption instincts are fairly solid (she sold off the gubenatorial jet upon taking office, for one), and a casual Nexis search suggests that she's fiscally conservative (insofar as that term makes sense in a quasi-socialist state like Alaska), but this hardly looks like the "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington" moment everyone's making it out to be.

P.S. Here's a piece that Palin's special counsel, John Katz, wrote in March of this year for the Juneau Empire, assuring the Alaskan public that Palin was still very much in favor of earmarks, but sadly needed to scale back her requests somewhat (to "only" 31 earmarks this year—down from 54 last year) in response to "unwanted attention" from Congress and the press



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not sure how that contradicts "we'll build it ourselves."
Has she, at some point, claimed that she opposed the bridge itself, as opposed to opposing the federal funding of it?

If she has, then she's obviously lying. If not, then she's playing word games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. "we'll build it ourselves"
Did she also say that? Because that's a classic anti-government type line and it's just garbage because every state gets federal highway money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. The media won't call her on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was the "Bullshit Express" a LONG time ago
This is just the latest episode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC