symbolman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:30 PM
Original message |
One Down! Next! Bring out the Morman, the one with the Fire in his Eyes!! |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 01:38 PM by symbolman
We'll be glad to introduce the Fundies to Romney's "Magic Underwear" - Plus the fact that the Mormans SUPPLY more PORN in their hotels/motels than all the Sleazy dive fucky shops in the World :)
Please Sir! May I have Another! Another Hypocrite that is..
McCain is officially Toast..
Oh, and MSM? You can cut the "neck and neck" polling bullshit Any time now.. :)
|
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
symbolman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I aim to please.. that's a line from the Original MASH film in case anyone remembers :)
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. .... don't forget the Magic Underwear. I imagine Mittens doesn't want to be |
symbolman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh, SoCalDem has Magic Undies pictures and Everything |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
symbolman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Oh SoCalDem has a pic/graphic of Romney |
|
and a woman wearing only their Magic Morman Undies that she has posted before.. a real crack up, with a Rocket Pocket in the front of Romney's and everything..
Didn't you know they wear those? :)
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I've heard rumors - but never seen! |
symbolman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
You'll be amazed.. they can HIDE stuff in there, maybe that's why they're "magic" :)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |