Chasing Dreams
(294 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:31 AM
Original message |
****** THIEF, THIEF, THIEF! and PORK. LIES. VIDEOTAPE. ****** |
|
We all know that the Republicans are very, very good at sloganeering and convincing uneducated voters to vote against their self interest. I believe that in addition to our great ticket and the best ideas, we have to come up with a few great slogans to attach to McPain/Failin that will get a good laugh, and turn the tables.
I post these to get the ball rolling. Hopefully, we can come up we a couple hundred, and perhaps one or two that Obama will love and use. So, to get us started here are two: 1. THIEF, THIEF, THIEF! Yes, this is meant to counter the Drill drones. Like it or not it that stupid moniker is working. So we need to trump it. The oil companies are stealing our paychecks, and our oil. We need to make them pledge that American oil stays in America, and by the way, why did thousands of our men and women die in Iraq so the oil could be sent to China?! Shame on Bush. Shame on McCain. 2. PORK. LIES. VIDEOTAPE. Go after these, hard: McCain's lobbyist connections. Palin's lies about the bridge and pork. We gotta show the tapes! I believe the stats will show that Palin's Wassila pork projects were the highest per capita of any city in the US, perhaps in US history.
And if you hate these, fine. My only goal is to tap into that great DU creativity, get those juices flowing, and beat these fuckers. :patriot:
|
zb1965
(39 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |
1. GOP voters are either very rich or very stupid...that's all... |
zb1965
(39 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. ...and no matter what you do or say, YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID. |
Chasing Dreams
(294 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I don't want to fix stupid voter. No, I want to co-opt stupid voter. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message |