Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC News: New Poll shows Palin pick unlikely to have any impact

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:40 PM
Original message
ABC News: New Poll shows Palin pick unlikely to have any impact
A newly released poll by ABC News confirms that the Palin pick is exciting the Republican base but having little impact outside of Repubican circles.

The results show that more of the public is influenced by Obama's pick of Joe Biden but that the vast majority are not going to be influenced by the VP pick. It also showed that the vast majority of the public thinks that Joe Biden is more ready to be president than Palin.




http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Story?id=5725793&page=2

IMPACT -- The public by a narrow 6-point margin, 25 percent to 19 percent, says Palin's selection makes them more likely to support McCain, less than the 12-point positive impact of Biden on the Democratic ticket (22 percent more likely to support Barack Obama, 10 percent less so). But majorities in both cases say the vice presidential picks won't matter in their vote, and those who do report an impact chiefly are reflecting their existing partisan predispositions

At the same time, the story in the ideological center is different: Among moderates, Biden registers as a net 15-point positive for Obama. In the same group, Palin shows no effect on support for McCain.

That's despite the fact that fewer than half, 42 percent, think Palin has the kind of experience it takes to serve effectively as president if that became necessary. Far more say Biden passes the experience bar, 66 percent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God for that
With all of this media love-in with Palin, I was starting to get worried.

Of course anyone with a brain would know that Joseph Biden is tons more qualified than Governor Airhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not so long ago, Palin had no clue as to what it is VP does.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL!
And she still ain't sure what the letters VP even stand for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. And whomever interviews her first should ask her if she's found
out what a VP does all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. This should be right.. I hope that means that this
time Americans aren't buying what the republicans and corporate media is cramming down their collective gullet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Which just goes to show that the "Game Changer" hysteria . . .
Was 90% media jabber from talking heads and 10% freikorps chanting on the RNC floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Her sole role was/is to secure the puke base.
It speaks to where mcpow is starting. He had to get his base before he could think of indys. Now, he will have a much harder time picking up moderates and indys.

Net loss. Not to mention the soap opera that follows her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Her Base is concentrated in Red States
It won't change the electoral picture at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
49. He had 3 months while the Dems were slugging it out
to come up with a plan and Palin was it!

If this doesn't sum up the man and his campaign nothing else will!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. A breath of fresh air and a slap of reality, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. This pick was made for one reason: to ensure that the fundies show up and send money
They've gone from certain slaughter to "a punchers chance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. actually he only made the pick after he was told he couldn't pick the other
candidates he wanted.

Then he had to make the best of it.

Kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. None of the others were going to do anything for him with the base
Mittens = disliked for massive flip flops and Evangelical distrust of LDS
Lieberman = Except fot the war, he mostly votes with us; fudndies distrust him
Pawlenty = My understanding is that he just didn't excite anybody in focus groups, and wasn't a sure thing to deliver MN
Huckleberry = Despised by the low tax /Grover Norquist crowd
Ridge = Pro choice. 'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. I swear I saw this poll earlier this week
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Dated 9/5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is it me or ABC is really going after Palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I think that they just ran a poll and published the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. They had unflattering pics of her yesterday
Running with her remarks on Hillary the previous day.

And the day before that they were going with the AIP story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know why many of you panicked. All she does is shore up the Repuke base.
She does NOTHING for Undecideds and Indies who will most likely swing this election.

We ignore her ass and take the right straight to McSame who is hiding behind her.

If nothing, this should teach us to trust Obama's judgment. He knows exactly what he's doing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
41. But shoring up the Repuke base is scary even by itself
That IS what put them over the top in 2004, and the enthusiasm gap was vastly in our favor before. Plus, the outpouring of support gave the (probably false) impression that LOTS of people who wouldn't bother to vote before now would, and the polls were already close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #41
58. It won't be enough this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
47. most reasonable people would have said, "what the hell was he thinking/"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. I sort of expected these results. According to two co-workers, both
moderate Repubs, even though she's a "firebrand", she came off as snarky. They had hoped to hear more about her, and less about her opponents. Each confided in me that the Palin pick would have little effect outside the very hardcore base of the party, and it looks like they may have been right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. People don't really like sarcasm in a leader that much

It can be ok when you have a long history in front of the people but it really looks bad when you are first on the scene. Looks ungracious and superficial. She should lose the sarcasm right a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Nope, let her keep the sarcasm, because as far as I can tell it really
turned some people off, and that's a good thing for us. One Repub co-worker mentioned to me yesterday that keeping her away from the press would wind up damaging her brand, because if the media doesn't have access, they'll define her out of spite; I don't know if that's true, but we shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagoexpat Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Regardless of the Sturm und Drang from the handwringers and the "media who cried wolf"
VP picks have proven time & again to have very little effect on the mass voting for the President, and to almost never affect the outcome in the final analysis.

They help or hurt in other ways, and I've discussed the positives & negatives elsewhere and in my blog, but people vote for the top of the ticket, pure & simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. This just verifies that the GOP long ago gave up on the middle
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:53 PM by Gman
and they're going "all in" on turning out their base to the maximum amount possible.

This is a big gamble for the GOP, but if it pays off it is dangerous to the greatest extreme for this country. The fundies will claim a mandate to push even harder for theocratic rule likely through executive orders that must be challenged in court while the theocrats appoint more and more sympathetic judges that would hear the cases.

This whole scenario is of the greatest danger this country has every seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm confused. ABC used to be the #2 GOP shill. Did Gramps piss them off that much?
Or, maybe the media are giving up on the GOP. They know which side their bread is buttered and they're not keeping up the charade.
Obama's got it in the electoral, with no hope for gramps.

Now, we just wait to see if they rig the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ha, ha, ha. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe now we can stop hyperventilating
and using three quarters of GDP for Palin threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. LET'S KEEP THIS KICKED
It's actual DATA. There ought ot be at least one data post in the mix of speculation about what Palin polling data *might * be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. Okay!
It's welcome news. I guess once all the fuss dies down, Middle America rolls back over and reaches for a cigarette, and stops to think for just a moment.
And the other person in bed winds up looking a lot less impressive the next morning than they did in the singles bar the night before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Did McCain do something to ABC? They seem to have turned in the last week.
Not shilling him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. But, but.....it excites the base......
...the tried and true, do or die, 18% who will march right off a cliff for corporate Jesus!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Fockin' grantcart: Putting the wood to the Repubs for as long as it takes...
K&R!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kick.
More or less what I figured. She's not all that.

MPK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. One would have to be an idiot to think Palin would help McCain
She is dissing environmentalists, librarians, community organizers, steelworkers, and the list goes on. She's a piece of work - they can't even let her go on the road alone yet. Pitbull with lipstick, yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everything-bolt-up Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. Mccain-Palin: One foot in the grave and a bun in the oven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. I've seen this poll earlier this week as well....I think the article is new though.
I wonder if they sent out the research first and now they're doing the analysis.

Either way, thanks for highlighting this.

I have a feeling that Palin's short term boost is about to give way to long term doubt and second-guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thanks grantcart you are the thermometer at DU
You always seem to find the information to take down our temperatures. thanks~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. I take this as good news. However, we are all still guessing about
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 10:40 PM by ladjf
her impact on the election. None of us have access to the minds of those in power.

However, one strong clue as to what is going on in the minds of the McCain campaign is that the first speeches by Palin referred to the "good work done by Hillary Clinton". Each time she was mentioned by Palin there were many loud boos.

The fact that Clinton was mentioned clearly indicated to me that at least part of their strategy for selecting Palin was to capture some of the Clinton disaffected voters. This has turned out to be a big mistake as evidenced by the fact that they have dropped the referenced to Clinton.

The "Clinton strategy" was a serious mistake. If the campaign people were delusional about the possibility of grabbing some of Hillary's supporters, perhaps they are just as mistaken in believing that America is ready to support an un-vetted, uneducated religious extremest as their possible next President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. Well, looks like she converted the choir
She never even stepped out of the church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. The corporate fascist may sell McCain/Palin out too or at least step back
If Palin were to get in she'd screw them worse than any "Liberals". Fundies like to gum up good revenue sources and stir up controversies that don't sell ads, widgets, or supplies.

Either way, the web is like have air superiority, they are have trouble keeping up and they must be beat back now before they can implement restrictions that they are chomping at the bit for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. Turnout among the base. That's the only concern now.
But the real risk was the excitement of her introduction. I believe that her negatives will grow as more people get to know her, her scandals and shocking inexperience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. I think she will have an impact
and switch a couple of States to Obama. She is the stereotypical popular bitch in B High School/College movies. The smiling evil conniver who everyone hates. This will motivate some Obama supporters and increase turnout. Her radical religious views will switch some other independent and Jewish voters. My guess is she delivers Florida and Montana to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. People Magazine, US Magazine, Newsweek covers -- media impact ... media darling
Palin is much more dangerous than Bush ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
44. McCain could have picked someone off the street and would have had more impact than her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
45. Recommended . . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
46. I figured as much.
Exciting only those who were going to vote for McBush anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
48. that's a reasonable educated guess, I'm worried about the Palin of the future
Even if Sen. Obama wins the Presidency and the short term goal fails, the extreme right might very well have found their voice.

After another four years as Governor and a bit of finishing school, Sarah Palin might appear a lot more viable.

Like many demagogues she has demonstrated an ability to wrap a right-wing extremist message in the language and imagery of a working class populist family woman to Orwellian levels - and she and her handlers are very, very good at it - so far, anyway.

Remember, Reagan sought and lost the Republican nomination in both 1968 and 1976. But he became the unifying figure of what emerged as the right-wing coalition which has now dominated the American political scene for a generation.

Before Ronald Reagan they had Barry Goldwater who lost in 1964 in one of the greatest landslides in American history. But he brought together the necessary elements to create this reactionary scourge which has so plagued our country and the world. At the time of 1964 most Americans considered Goldwater an extremist nut. "In your gut you know he's a nut." By the end of the 80's Goldwater was way too moderate and reasonable for the political movement he once led, a movement which came to dominate the American body politic.

I have a nightmare that whatever the result of the election, Sarah could very well emerge as the voice of the movement that Reagan once led and Goldwater was way too liberal to lead.

Again it is entirely possible that the whole thing could fizzle or implode. For the sake of the country and the world and the future of humanity, I certainly hope so. But, Reagan "could" have fizzled or imploded too, way back in the 60's or 70's, but he didn't. Now we are faced with someone who would make Ronald Reagan look like a Birkenstock socialist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
59. I doubt it. This election cycle might be the end for the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. I certainly hope you are right. But unless she out and out implodes, I'm sure we will see her
in 2012 and will be hearing from her over the next few years.

Like Reagan and Bush Jr. she has that uncanny ability to wrap an elitist agenda in the language and imagery of anti-elitist, this might very well extend well outside of fundamentalist circles.

For now anyway, the extreme right have found their voice in Sarah Palin. This could very well certainly change or perhaps she could even implode. I certainly hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. She's corrupt as all hell, and not very smart about it, either.
That will be her undoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
50. I'd like to know how many people say McCain's choice makes them less
likely to vote for him than before he picked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. My theory about ABC: 1. They are rivals of NBC/MSNBC; and 2. They know who will be in office next!
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 03:37 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
53. "the vast majority of the public thinks that Joe Biden is more ready to be president than Palin."
And that question I wouldn't doubt probably correlates more with the polls than anything, else we see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
54. I wouldn't give ABC Network the time of day. They are worse than Fox because they hide
their bias better. ABC is part of the evil fascist empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
55. If MSM is reporting it as "unlikely to have an impact" then it has
an impact and that is a negative impact. -

This weekend, I talked to folks that supported mccain or were voting repub - now they are digusted - they hate politics, they are all crooks and they are not voting.

Forgot about courting the undecideds, the hillary supporters and the independents - they just turned off the rational members of their own party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. We still need to work like we are 10 pts. down

Just heard CNN - Bill S. say the polls are "close."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Of course we need to work - it doesn't matter who he named
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:06 AM by merh
he would have gotten a bump because THEY DON'T LIKE HIM - that is what I find so astounding, how the hell the GOP got stuck with him.

You'd think if they could fix an election they would have fixed the elections in the primaries - next time they will - they know they are in trouble.

Yes, we work and we do so by presenting the positive. You can't make a silk purse from a moose ear.

Push the new GOP slogan when you talk to your friends, push McCain's platform:

"Trust us to fix what we broke."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
62. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC