http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/04/magazine/04LETTERS.htmlHe's short of stature and short on funds. No matter. Readers were overwhelmingly supportive of Dennis Kucinich and the substance of his platform.
The Optimist When I first saw Marshall Sella's article on Dennis Kucinich, I was over the moon (Dec. 21). My elation faded, however, as I read it. Kucinich is short (a couple inches shorter than Lieberman), he's uncharismatic, he's a vegan, and he's on the left end of the spectrum.
I'd rather hear about his unwavering stance against the Iraq war, his plan for true universal health care, his commitment to guaranteed pre-K-through-college education, his stance on minority and gay rights and his willingness to face down corporate power. What makes a candidate electable? Is it stature and good looks? Is it money? The answer is that the biggest deciding factor of electability is coverage in the news media.
Is Kucinich too optimistic? Maybe so, but if he is, it's because he, like me, was raised to believe that America is a country where even a dirt-poor kid can make a difference without money, without influence and without media backing.
Jeremy Hart
Houston
I'm a senior, a white male, a small-business owner who doesn't belong to any of the fringe groups mentioned in your article. I have looked into Kucinich's background, seen him in person three times and looked at what he stands for in some depth. What has made me a passionate admirer of him and what he stands for I have learned in spite of the news media. I certainly didn't get anything worthwhile from your article. A few snickers, maybe.
Locke McCorkle
Palo Alto, Calif
--------
There are a few more published. Only one negative. :D