Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I feel that some kind of intentional baiting is going on with the "lipstick" comment.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:30 PM
Original message
I feel that some kind of intentional baiting is going on with the "lipstick" comment.
It makes me nervous because I'm not sure if it's a good move or a dumb one.

But I'm guessing the idea is to make McCain's campaign overplay their ridiculous victimhood, "lay off Sarah" card and call them out on it, to lay out on the table that this is what they are doing.

The more I think about it, the more I think it might be the right move, but it does make me nervous.

This has probably been posted 5 times already, please disregard if it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree Mayberry,


When I read the 'Lipstick' remark earlier today I thought it would blow up knowing the McCain camp. I almost posted that I didn't like it. It seem obvious to me it could be taken wrong. I was away for a couple ours and come back to some kind of smack down which I'm still trying to understand but it seemed to make DU happy.

I suspect every comment is closely vetted this close to election so I think they lured the McCain camp into a quick response and then gansta slapped 'em.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the McCain camp would happily ride this "look at Sarah/leave Sarah alone" bullshit all the
way to Election Day if the media and the Obama camp would allow them. The absolute flood of bullshit is nonstop.

I'm guessing it was a calculated provocation to draw the expected response and to highlight this bullshit right now. To hopefully try to get the media narrative back on track.

If that is the case, I hope they have calculated right. It actually does seem smart in a way but risky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Stop fucking hoping and start fighting
What the fuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AkFemDem Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only way it goes anywhere for the Right is if
Obama plays into this ridiculous farce and tries to explain himself or worse- apologize.

I doubt he'd do anything that foolish, I hope not.

He needs to not react at all whenever it is raised as an "issue" and his people need to ridicule it openly, making the Right look like a bunch of sissie-pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. He's already thrown down the gauntlet, accusing the Mccain campaign of phony lectures
He has to keep hitting, and I think he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatsDogsBabies Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't assume that "they" are smarter than "us"
and no need to always second guess. "They" need to be challenged - "they" are the opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama on Letterman tomorrow night.
Large audience.

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Thanks, I was wondering when that was going
to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeah, but didn't mcCan't say the same thing about Hillary? So, all's fair...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That's my point. I suspect that Obama made the "lipstick" and "fish" comments as part of a
calculated move.

The remarks can be viewed as provocative but have plausible deniability. They are guaranteed to draw McCain's campaign into a frenzy, as they have done (demanding an apology and all that). Then Obama's people point out that not only was Obama not talking about her, it's a common expression, McCain himself has used it recently in reference to a woman, and not only that but it's been an endless nonstop parade of faux outrage and offendedness from the Republicans. Palin is running for VP, just because she's a female they want some kind of ridiculous sheltered bubble for her?

The point is, if they force the conflict on this shit right now, they either get hurt badly, or shame the media away from participating in the endless faux outrage. If it works, it forces the McCain people to have to shift to some other line of bullshit than what they've been going with the better part of a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. What makes it a thing of beauty is that it's Cheney's famous line
describing Kerry/Edwards among other things. It's evil on several levels but nooooooooooooooooobody said peep about it when fat bastard ruled the airwaves, so their protests now sound completely delusional, as in senile dementia.

Oh, it is to bust a gut!!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is a war...every strategy involves risk
This is a good risk.

We can't be nervous over everything. We have to assert that certain things are a win and keep asserting it. that's what they do, and that's why they've won. This pussyfooting indecision is weak ass shit in a war. Own the strategy and go whole hog with it, so to speak. The Mccain campaighn is unhinged here. They look ridiculous. Let 'em have it. then hit them again.

Fuck nervousness. that's for policy. This is a street fight. You have to fight or beat sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrizzlyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why is it whenever one of the good guys lands a punch
It makes everyone nervous? Today was a great day for Obama. Relax already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm nervous in a good way, because I am starting to see the wisdom in what Obama is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It's unbelievable, and it's why we've lost...."I'm nervous...I hope...I hope"
Fuck that. Fight. Hope is for primaries and governing. Streetfighting is for the general, and we need less nervousness and more asskicking.

The capacity of DUers to snatch a bad day from a good one is remarkable, and it is rooted in "nervousness."

People keep talking about "controlling the narrative." Well how the fuck do you think somebody 'controls a narrative?" By picking a story and going with it. That's what a narrative is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. LOL--nobody is used to seeing a Dem fight this way.
I think that's why the case of nerves. He knows what he's doing, this one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Too many on our side get "nervous" about every move the campaign makes

When he doesn't attack, they post that they're nervous he's repeating the mistakes of Kerry.


When he does, like this, they make posts like yours.



QUIT BEING SO FUCKING NERVOUS, DEMOCRATS.


Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
votetastic Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. It gives Obama the chance to play the "gender card" card, which they did today
and will probably continue until the McCain campaign is cowed into submission.

It's a win-win for Obama, call them on playing the gender card, and they can never bring up the "sexism" crap again (similar to how McCain did with the "race card" card)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. Oh please, everyone knows what "lipstick on a pig" means
just as everyone knows what "grow some balls" means, and neither commonly used phrases are ever used with the intension of disparaging who they're directed at with anything having to do with gender. McCain embarrassed himself by being the one to throw out the gender card on this one, and the average person will see that. Hopefully they'll also see that Palin herself didn't have the courage to defend herself from the comment and allowed McCain (the knight in shining armor) to do it for her as though she were the fluttery weak maiden needing rescuing. This also reflects badly on McCain because of his acting like the knight in shining armor shows he himself chose a weak running mate he feels he needs to protect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC