Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can we stop posting these idiotic nationwide polls - THEY MEAN SHIT and they are misleading

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:54 PM
Original message
Can we stop posting these idiotic nationwide polls - THEY MEAN SHIT and they are misleading
Ask yourself this one question - when was the last presidential election in the United States where the outcome was based just on the popularity vote?

Still thinking - well good, now you know why these stupid nationwide polls mean shit. They lump all the blue/red/purple states together as one giant size lump and say "47-44" blah blah blah and in all reality it means SHIT.

This is the only numbers that count - if the election were held today based on STATEWIDE polls - who would win the ELECTORIAL VOTE

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Right now we're ahead. It's close - alot of states are too close to call so there is plenty of work to be done. But stop posting these shitty populary polls because it's the way of saying 'LOOK HOW CLOSE THIS IS PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY BUYING INTO MCCAIN'S CRAP'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. And it's still the convention bump
They will lose it by the end of the month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. well that remains to be seen - it'll be a tight race
just hate seeing us panic over nonsense polls whose soul purpose is to make us panic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:48 PM
Original message
Of course it'll be tight, but this is a convention bounce
It'll be out of the numbers by the end of the month. If this is the best McPain can do, he's pretty pathetic (but
we knew that already).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or ask yourself when was the last time the national vote didn't match the electoral college?
Gore won Florida in 2000.

There was no mismatch there.

The last time the electoral college differed from the popular vote for real was in the 1800s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope not...
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 01:32 PM by cynatnite
They are snapsnots of public opinion and no candidate worth their salt will ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. EC rarely (in mordern politics) differs from pop vote.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/

Popular Vote: 49.0% - 49.0%
Obama loses Popular Vote, wins Electoral Vote 3.77%
McCain loses Popular Vote, wins Electoral Vote 1.42%

If Popular Vote swings even further say +2% the odds get insanely small like <0.50%.
If Popular vote swings way out say +4% the odds EC won't match popular vote in 2 party race is essentially 0%.

The key is to look at GOOD polls.

Gallup = crap.
Rasumussen (excluding leaners) is best IMHO.
If you look at core # (not leaners) it doesn't move much from day to day. Very few blips and reversals.
Right now it is showing a slow decline for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well then all we need to do is go back to 2000 to debunk that theory
The key is to focus on the ELECTORIAL vote. We should be posting that every single day and focusing on states where we can solidify that and yes then in the long run we'll get the popular vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So you think Bush won Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Oh come on I know he didn't which even puts more into question these nationwide polls
He also didn't win Ohio too.

But if they can word these polls to make it seem like the election is close then it's easier for them to steal. Like the poll about Palin gaining 'favorablity' with white women. Guess what favorablity just means I like the person doesn't mean I'm voting for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Everyone has an opinion on what the 'good' polls are...
I think Rasmussen sucks.

They are complicated bits of data that snapshots public opinion at any given moment. Given the size of the samplings and the rest of the internals there will be wide disparity between polls.

I look at polls over a period of weeks and months rather than one at a time. I watch how it fluctuates over that period of time and think about what might have played a roll to make it change.

That's how I view polls. I also won't dismiss the ones I don't like either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree to an extent
I agree polls are more useful to show trends rather than individual points in time.
I still think Gallup's methodology is flawed.

The best "poll" I think is 538 Super Tracker.
By using some statistical methods is eliminates outliers and I believes gives us best "picture" of current trend.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rec'd. They don't mean shit and they just lower morale here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Exactly. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. This will fall on deaf ears...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC