1corona4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:38 PM
Original message |
FUCK RON PAUL!!!!!!! HE JUST SAID THAT HE DOSN'T SEE.... |
|
ANY difference in Obama and McCain!!!(CNN) He said that him getting in the race will pull voters from Obama, so Wolf asked him if he was tring to block Obama, and I didn't hear what he said....he's a fucker, and if I remember right, he has been accused of being a racist.
GOD, I know this is a democracy, but I swear to GOD, if this fucker ruins this for Obama, I will......well, it won't be good.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:39 PM
Original message |
SHHH... he is a libertarian... most votes pulled will NOT be from Obama |
Amy6627
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I agree and Bob Barr nutcase will also pull from McSame & Phailan |
KathieG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ron Paul is a libertarian nutjob...of course he'll say that... |
|
He's pretty low on the radar. I wouldn't worry.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a little late for him to get in the race. |
|
And why wouldn't he support Barr if he wanted to get involved?
|
Madam Mossfern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't think that those who were drawn to Ron Paul |
|
would have supported Obama anyway. I guess he's for McCain then..:shrug:
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No. He's going to Ruin it for McCain |
|
Nader already ruined it for us...twice.
It would be wonderful to not have a two party system...but we f***ing don't so Ron and Ralph need to f*** off.
|
iamthebandfanman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. nah, the SCOTUS did it to us in 2000 |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM by iamthebandfanman
along with the hard work of election frauders in florida...
but i honestly think they both hurt mccain more than obama..
|
mcg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
37. Nader also did it to us, |
1corona4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
19. Nadar was with him... |
|
their plan is to make a point of a 3rd party being able to run, and win the WH....yeah right nadar, you've lost, how many fucking times now???
I hate both of them.
|
cameozalaznick
(624 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
27. Actually it was Buchanan who ruined it for us in 2000 nt |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. IIRC Paul is a racist, right? |
|
I remember seeing some not so flattering things he has said in the past. Screw him and Nader. Couple of douchebags.
I'd like to think the American people are smarter than to fall for their pile of steaming crap this election cycle. :shrug:
|
nsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
23. Paul has plenty of connections to racist types. |
|
You're probably thinking of the controversy about his newsletter, which printed blatantly racist things under his name. He's tried to deny it, but I don't think there's any surprise that's he's trying to sabotage Obama.
|
1corona4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
28. Well, there are 2 people on CNN right now, |
|
one from the mccrap campaign, and she said that Obama has to STOP attacking Palin!!! WTF? Someone, refresh my memory. WHEN did Obama attack Palin???
GOD, this is getting RIDICULOUS.
|
secondwind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
7. McCain will be affected..........not Obama............relax... :) |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He had racist crap in his newsletter.
And now the racist is allied with Nader, which tells you something about NAder.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
what is that group that endorsed him called, storm something...gotta google it.
|
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
9. he won't pull shit from Obama |
|
The ron paul "revolution" is a libertarian internet cult, with a sporadic following on campuses everywhere.
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
10. What the hell do you expect? |
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Wolf showed poll results with Nader getting 6% in MI. That's quite a pull |
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
13. He doesn't have that kind of appeal |
|
Most of the people I know with Ron Paul yard signs are natural-born Republicans.
|
DemzRock
(824 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I suspect that he will pull just a little more from McCain than Obama... |
|
I like Ron Paul in some ways. I like his foreign policy views and his views on privacy. He also seems more authentic than most politicians. But he's still crazy.
|
iamthebandfanman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. thats the only thing him and nader agree on too |
|
that and other consitutional issues... other than that, they are completely different...
definitely weird seeing them together...
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. He'll mainly get Independents and Repubs. He won't get Dems, unless they're into gold & silver. n/t |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Relax. What makes you think he'd vote for Obama? I'm just happy |
|
he's not supporting McBush. He did run against the Dems iirc.
|
1corona4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
31. I never thought he would... |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 04:03 PM by 1corona4u
but him coming in at this late stage, just proved to me that he wants to throw this election into a tailspin to make a fucking POINT about himself. This is bullshit. Oh, and he commented to the effect of "evil", in reference to Obama and Mcass, and Wolf asked him who was worse, and he wouldn't say.....
I can't wait to see that transcript.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
33. My skin has thickened right up this year; you should try it! |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 04:09 PM by babylonsister
Ron Paul isn't even in the running, so I don't really care what he says. IF he can move his rabid supporters away from McBush, I'm all for it - I wasn't counting on them to support Obama.
|
1corona4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
35. My skin is thick, but I see this as a threat to not just Obama, |
|
but it's shit like this that ruins the importance of any election. If you know what I mean. People might start to say; fuck it, I'm not voting at all, when these 2 clowns pop into the public eye.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. I don't see him as any kind of threat; I'm choosing to ignore him. nt |
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Ron's racist little band of nutjobs were never going to vote for a black guy. If we're lucky this might just pump up the other nutjobs numbers giving Bob Barr a bit of a bump in the deep south with the "working white vote" aka cracker assholes.
|
lolamio
(494 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Ron Paul voters would never have gone for Obama anway. He definitely hurts McSame more. n/t |
ellenfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
24. i know one registered republican who is actually a |
|
libertarian, who is voting for ron paul. he will definitely draw from mcsame, as will barr. you are dealing with the same issues as those who think mooselini would take hillary's voters. ron paul is too far right for any but libertarians and other conservatives.
ellen fl
|
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
25. He's not going to hurt Obama, he's going to hurt McCain. |
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Ron Paul is a raving lunatic. |
RollWithIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Did he endorse Ralph Nader? nt |
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
30. No difference - isn't that what Nader said in 2000? |
|
I get the feeling Ron Paul will do to the Republicans in 2008 what Nader did to the Democrats in 2000.
|
danimich1
(91 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Isn't that EXACTLY what Nader said? |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-10-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Ah so he's borrowing Nader's schtick now huh? |
|
Fuck the both of them... they're both helping McInsane.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |