Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Role in the Mortgage Meltdown: Hit Him With Facts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 AM
Original message
McCain's Role in the Mortgage Meltdown: Hit Him With Facts
all those folks in foreclosure.....

need to see how McCain helped create it:


see this The Nation article:

<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080922/scheer >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. And....more Media Fraud and Skewing.....
from The Nation:

"Parts of the media are so obsessed with the "Palin bounce" that they're ignoring or mislabeling the very facts they claim to cite.

A case in point is this latest headline from Time Magazine's Mark Halperin, based on new battleground polling from Quinnipiac University: "Palin Boosts McCain in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania." Yet a closer look inside the polling shows that Obama has actually widened his lead in Ohio, from a one point advantage in August to a five point advantage now. So how exactly is Palin giving McCain a bounce in Ohio?! This is just sloppy journalism.

True, McCain has widened his lead in Florida and cut Obama's margin in Pennsylvania. But a more accurate headline might read: "McCain Opens Lead in Florida, While Obama Expands Margin in Ohio, Race Tightens in Pennsylvania."

And, by the way, if Obama wins Ohio and Pennsylvania and McCain wins Florida, Obama most likely wins the election. But of course Halperin doesn't tell you that. "

<http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/359050/media_skews_obama_mccain_polling>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. AND....why it was really NOT the SURGE.....
(gad, i wish O had not said the surge worked)

"The Secret Behind the Surge
Tom Hayden : Iraq War

Bob Woodward's new book on the Bush years in Iraq raises the possibility that extrajudicial killings--not the surge--were the biggest factor in reducing violence."

<http://www.thenation.com/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. And....GET the FACTS our about the TAX cuts....
"What's Your Obama Tax Cut?

posted by Peter Rothberg on 09/10/2008 @ 6:21pm



According to a recent Gallup poll, fifty-three percent of Americans expect their federal income taxes to increase if Barack Obama is elected president.

The truth: The Democratic candidate's plan would cut taxes for roughly 95 percent of American families, reports the non-partisan Tax Policy Center. How much would Obama save you? Check out ObamaTaxCut.com, a project of AlchemyToday.com, to use a nifty new tool that lets you calculate exactly what the Obama tax-cut would be worth to you."

<http://www.thenation.com/blogs/actnow/358663 >


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. a crucial argument for Obama: the top economic person near McCain...


as the architect of the housing disaster...

Gramm left his role as the top economic person near McCain ONLY after he made an embarrassing statement blaming the current economic downturn on "whiners," an awkward reference to the victims of his disastrous legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Phil Gramm who along with his wife Wendy are key architects of the deregulation of
trading of energy commodities (the Enron loophole).

http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/2008/051908Leopold.shtml

<snip>

Clearing the way for that California price gouging, Gramm, as a powerful Texas senator in 2000, slipped an Enron-backed provision into the Commodities Futures Modernization Act that exempted from regulation energy trading on electronic platforms.

Then, over the next year, Enron – with Gramm’s wife Wendy serving on its board of directors – worked to create false electricity shortages in California, bilking consumers out of an estimated $40 billion.

<snip>

The “Enron loophole” also has become part of the debate over the soaring price of oil. Last week, a study sponsored by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, concluded that speculative futures markets were partly to blame for the surge in oil prices that have pushed gas at the pump toward $4 a gallon.

At a May 15 news conference, Levin said the skyrocketing price of oil is “not the result of supply and demand. Speculators have taken over most of the futures market."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. oops dupe delete
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:31 AM by G_j
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. dems have to get the word out to voters
voters may have short memories

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not sure I'm looking at the right votes here,
but if I am, for the "Commodity Futures Modernization Act" referred to in the article, McCain ducked the vote, and Biden voted for it.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00354

For the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act" referred to, McCain voted for it and Biden against in a vote that was strictly down party lines.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00105
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. okay
you did more research than i did

we better not use this then,

since the 'modernization' bill was the real culprit, i think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think they were both responsible...
but the first one without the second one wouldn't have made the problem as bad. In the end, IMHO, it really comes down to the banks themselves making suspect mortgages knowing they could just sell it to another company (or to investors as a commodity) to cover their risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC