Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Palins Husband & Others To Be Subpoenaed In Troopergate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:38 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Palins Husband & Others To Be Subpoenaed In Troopergate
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 01:59 PM by kpete
in Troopergate heard just now on CNN

September 12, 2008
Investigator wants subpoena for Palin's husband
Posted: 02:34 PM ET

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (CNN) — A special counsel has asked Alaskan lawmakers to subpoena Gov. Sarah Palin's husband and a dozen aides as part of the investigation into Palin's firing of her public safety commissioner.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/12/investigator-wants-subpoena-for-palins-husband/

.................

Investigator seeks to subpoena Todd Palin
Probe also wants to subpoena 13 witnesses, key Palin aide

ANCHORAGE, Alaska - The investigator looking into whether Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power in trying to fire her former brother-in-law is asking state lawmakers for the power to subpoena Palin's husband, Todd.

The probe has taken on new significance since Republican presidential candidate John McCain picked Palin as his running mate.

Retired prosecutor Stephen Branchflower asked the state House and Senate judiciary committees for power to subpoena 13 witnesses, including Todd Palin. The committees were expected to grant the request.
Branchflower said he wants to interview Palin herself, but did not ask for a subpoena for her.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26677221/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now Charlie really has to go there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think Charlie's done. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Without any questions on her actual record?
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 02:13 PM by BeyondGeography
I thought there were three parts to this...correct me if I'm wrong, anyone.

On edit: There are three interviews: http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view/2008_09_12_With_Sarah_Palin_at_the_plate__Charlie_Gibson_throws_hard/srvc=home&position=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. What I meant was that he was done with the interview. I think it was one sit down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ladies and gentlemen... This is really going to be funny...... HAHAHAHAHAH
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The 1st question is: Will the lawmakers issue the subpoenas? Question 2: If they do, will Palin
somehow get this pushed pack until after the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Her lawyer has indicated he will be moving to quash the subpoenas. You can bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Then we need to find the clip/article
where she stated she would fully cooperate. Or do a "what does she have to hide" ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yep. It's 'Lose/Lose' in the options department for Palin
Either come clean and take your lumps, or "What are you trying to hide, Sarah?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will the "first dude" claim executive privilege? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. hmm, i wonder if he'll plead the 5th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. This shit's comin' to a head., people. Emails went to hubby and shouldn't have.
Of course her attorneys will attempt to quash the subpoenas.......but what are they gonna do, claim "executive privilege" for her hubby?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's why her "executive privilege"
argument will fall flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yup Yup Yup!! First Dude is in for a surprise!! McStalin will be so sorry
to have picked up Sarah Lard-in as his VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. How many people want to bet the MSM won't cover this and will barely mention it
I RAISE MY HAND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good.
Maybe we'll finally see Caribou Barbie appear somewhere without her Driller Ken Doll.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'd like to see a 527 ad showing four years of Palin and her hubby under investigation.
The phone rings at 3 a.m. in the vice presidential home ... "Damn, Todd, it's another investigator!"

See them sneaking around with newspapers in front of their face, hiding from the deputy who's trying to serve the latest subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC