Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-08 10:48 PM
Original message |
It was a win for Obama (And also kind of a tie) |
|
The only people who matter are persuadable voters.
Among persuadable voters Obama is more unknown and had much more room for increased positives.
So in terms of moving actual votes in play, a clear win for Obama. I will not be surprised if there is some poll movement in Obama's favor.
As a TV debate... kind of a tie. (I have seldom seen a Dem lose a debate to a pug on policy or facts, but that's not the central TV contest)
Obama was over-cautious in a way that was smart, disciplined and won more votes, and that's the name of the game. (Versus taking clearer bolder stands, which is more fun to watch, but probably politically thankless.)
Obama and McCain were both over-coached and gave a lot of fragmentary 'inside baseball' snippets that persuadable voters don't recognize. For instance, McCain's crack about not having a seal... nobody in America who knows about the seal controversy is undecided. And Obama did not do a good job of identifying who and what he was talking about. Words like "it" and "there" are a problem in debates. Always make the sentence clear to avoid confusion and so it functions as a sound-byte. (I'm sure a lot of slower viewers had trouble telling when Barack was talking about Afghanistan and when he was talking about Iraq.)
Also, Obama's stammering at the beginning of replies is indicative of thinking, rather than reciting, but is a habit that should have been addressed during the primary debates. It really is okay to pause before answering (good theater, even), and preferable to beginning in a halting fashion.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Great, a big picture person to talk to. I thought on debate points McSame only lost by 1 but on... |
|
...campaign points Obama whooped dat azz due to him being able to hold his ground on foreign policy issues which was a perceived weakness.
Also Obama looked more pragmatic which is good for a campaign but REALLY REALLY bad form for a debate with a low puncher like McSame.
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Agreed. Ironically, "winning" debates probably doesn't win votes |
|
Obama is the front-runner and is right to be cautious. It is the correct political move.
But such caution doesn't make for riveting TV.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |