Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

94 Dems have voted Nay ... WTF is wrong with them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:00 PM
Original message
94 Dems have voted Nay ... WTF is wrong with them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Principle! You know, like here on DU!
Ask Dennis Kucinich. He'll tell you why he voted Nay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. His view in 1 minute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. I agree with him 100% n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. DUPE
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 02:09 PM by MrWiggles
oops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing
That's probably what their constituents want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Rasmussen had a poll out today that showed post debate opposition to the bailout fell greatly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're doing the people's work n/t
I'm surprised, really, because so many politicians work for the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Who's work? People that already have no jobs, no house, and no 401(k)?
Moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. They don't believe in Welfare for Wall Street???? I am with them.
Good. We need to start over. The newspeople are shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. I'm with them too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm no economist
But anything the Chimp wants this badly cannot be good. Therefore Nay doesn't sound so bad to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Exactly. The radio news was just saying Bush and Cheney had lobbied hard
for this bill to pass. Which tells me to just hold off a little. There WILL be a bailout of some time. There is no reason to rush through another bad piece of Bush legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Pelosi seemed to like it, too, and I don't trust her anymore.
Bad news bill if Bushie wants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. That is beyond idiocy. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. The sky is falling
Shouldn't you be running instead of slamming me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. No, because you're the fucking reason that the sky is falling.
You and every other fucking moron that doesn't understand the ramifications of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. That's a matter of opinion, Chicken Little
I don't trust *, I do trust a few Dems yet and those are the ones on the Nay side. Jeezus, chill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing is wrong with them.
They are trying to force the Rs to come on board with this bill so they won't get all the blame for it.

The Ds could pass this with just D votes, but they're SMARTER than that. The Rs will need to cave if the bill is to pass. Ds MUST hold the line here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. They have tough races in November
This bill is not popular. Their opponents back home are just waiting with the attack ads, ready to go if they vote for it.

You don't schedule a vote on a bill like this a month before a fucking election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why should dems be stuck?
Repubs put us in this situation and don't want to participate in getting out. Plus, I really don't trust a word out of Paulson and Bush's mouth. This was too much like the urgency of the Iraq war vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. That's what comes with being the party in power
You not only have the power, you also have the responsibility and you have to be ready to take the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. It can wait until after the election. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. They're waiting for the country first crowd to step up and save the day.
Which is only right in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are clowns and should all be removed from office (along with all the pugs)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. They want the pugs to belly up to the bar
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 01:02 PM by Xipe Totec
and take responsibility for the mess.

Pugs want the bill to pass, but still want to blame the Democrats for the cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Yup! I knew this would happen.
If Americans think they can depend on the GOP to do anything more than posture for the next election they are badly mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Yeah... no one in a difficult re-election campaign wants anywhere near a Yes vote.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. The deal was it had to be nearly 100 % or they weren't passing
it. The time is not for partisan politics. You can't pass a Wall Street bailout on strictly partisan lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. They're smart?
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 01:04 PM by MercutioATC
This bill was going to stink regardless of how much perfume Dems put on it.

Now, we can actually address the problem instead of just throwing money at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Thank you for making sense! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sodan Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. I trust Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. What's his plan to avert the crisis?
Here is what he proposes (scroll down).

The number of people claiming that those who have expressed doubts about the plans on the table are saying that there is no crisis is beyond unbelievable.

There is a crisis, and Congress better come up with a plan.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Democrats should not have supported any bill unless Republicans did
Period.

Bush messed up the economy. Why would Democrats try to save him one month before an election while allowing Republicans to look like they are the ones standing up to Bush?

We need to win this election. Four or eight years of McCain will be far worse than one stock market crash.

Pelosi is a failure to let this happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Agree 100%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackmanX Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pelosi needs to get on her job
You can't tell me she can't pull 11 of those dems who voted nay to vot yes. This is like watching congress take part in the 1929 stock market crash and enabling it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. The Insurance plan proposed by House Republicans is a non starter ...
It will not solve the liquidity crisis ...


The insurance plan is a stunt


DEMS need to pass this ..the should grow a pair and do the right thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. It has always been clear..
..that this bill HAD to be bipartison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. What About The Majority Of Republicans Who Voted Nay? McCain Said He ...
Was convincing them...Indeed, wasn't McCain taking credit for bringing them in support of the Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daemonaquila Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. Nothing at all - they're right
There is no reason to think that the bailout will work, other than vague promises and threats from the Bushies. During the Great Depression, they solved our economic problems by saving people's homes, getting them into work, etc. This is a pure corporate welfare effort, with nothing for Americans who are being hit hard by the crisis. The bill would, at best, continue the crisis for many more months or years as the worthless securities are propped up so they can continue to poison the market, and toxic execs keep their jobs and ginormous paychecks and continue on to do more of the same.

The way to stabilize the market is to stabilize homeowners' mortgages directly.

Cheers to the folks voting against the bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Because
Many Democrats do not feel that they should be the ones to have to put their careers on the line to try and fix a problem that the other party is almost 100% responsible for.

In a way I kind of agree with them, even though it seems that this bailout should have passed for the good of the country.

Bottom line is that more Republicans should have voted for this bill because they are the ones who created this mess in the first place, and now we really need to hold their feet to the fire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. duplicate post
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 01:23 PM by iceman66
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. The important thing to remember
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 01:28 PM by iceman66
is that any responsibility for this now needs to be laid squarely at the feet of the Republicans!

They not only created the problem, but rejected the solution based on purely political considerations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Extremists and purists. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
44. it's politics........constituents back home, etc. , probably a re-election year for them
-- nothing out of the ordinary.

This too shall pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
45. I agree that if the Republicans weren't going to vote for it, then it should fail
And, as most people know, I was a supporter of the bailout. At the same time, the GOP has to grow up. They can't have it both ways, and they will be reduced to being the party of the kooky religious wackos now. They just lost their business base.

But yes. If they backed out, then it should fail. They don't get to eat their conservative wacko cake and blame the Dems too. They made the shit sandwich. Now they're gonna have to eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
46. they have some respect for their beliefs
nobody thinks we should be bailing out failed businesses with our tax money... but if it saves us from something worse, it mite be worth it... so long as we put a system into place where this can NEVER happen again....


we need to start taking over profitable businesses, not failed ones.
lower costs and more jobs all around... but oh no...


i hate this warped fascism these people follow these days... taking only the worst of socialism when it suites them , any other time railing about how anti-american it is to do those things... so hypocritical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. They just saved us the election! Why do so many not see that? -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC