Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CQ Politics has more details on the Senate vote tomorrow.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:01 PM
Original message
CQ Politics has more details on the Senate vote tomorrow.
Senate Plans Vote on Financial Rescue Wednesday

CQ Politics has more details on the Senate vote tomorrow. It will take 60 votes to amend the bill and 60 to pass it. That means there will have to be significant Republican participation to pass it, just like in the House. I do like this bit:

CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS – ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
Updated Sept. 30, 2008 – 8:46 p.m.
Senate Plans Vote on Financial Rescue Wednesday
By Bart Jansen, Benton Ives, Joseph J. Schatz and Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff

In addition, Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., will be allowed to offer an amendment that will receive a voice vote. Sanders has called for a 10 percent surtax on individuals earning at least $500,000 per year, in order to help pay for the plan.

Go Bernie!
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000002967096
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw this.



White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the administration was open to modifications of the failed plan as long as it continued to hew to the core principles laid out by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr.

“I don’t think we have to start all over. We do have a solution that will fix the problem, and that’s the original proposal that was made by Secretary Paulson,” Fratto said. “There are lots of good ideas that can help the financial services industry and our financial markets, and we’re going to look at all of those ideas.”

However, he was cool to an idea some have floated: shrinking the amount of money that would be authorized for the program.

“We think that’s the right number,” Fratto said. “Unless Secretary Paulson comes back and says it’s a different number. That was his expert, considered judgment of his team and other federal regulators and people who follow the markets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This is horseshit
"“We think that’s the right number,” Fratto said. “Unless Secretary Paulson comes back and says it’s a different number. That was his expert, considered judgment of his team and other federal regulators and people who follow the markets."

That number was pulled out of THIN AIR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Word!
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 11:02 PM by chill_wind
The Forbes quote by the Paulson staffer was everywhere.

http://correntewire.com/treasury_we_just_wanted_to_choose_a_really_large_number
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC