Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What it's like to debate Sarah Palin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:38 PM
Original message
What it's like to debate Sarah Palin
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 01:38 PM by themartyred


"Andrew, I watch you at these debates with no notes, no papers, and yet when asked questions, you spout off facts, figures, and policies, and I'm amazed. But then I look out into the audience and I ask myself, 'Does any of this really matter?' " Palin said.

While policy wonks such as Biden might cringe, it seemed to me that Palin was simply vocalizing her strength without realizing it. During the campaign, Palin's knowledge on public policy issues never matured – because it didn't have to. Her ability to fill the debate halls with her presence and her gift of the glittering generality made it possible for her to rely on populism instead of policy.

Palin is a master of the nonanswer. She can turn a 60-second response to a query about her specific solutions to healthcare challenges into a folksy story about how she's met people on the campaign trail who face healthcare challenges. All without uttering a word about her public-policy solutions to healthcare challenges."

<snip from story>

MORE AT www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's the master of nothing.
And she's going to prove it...yammering on about 5 things that are losely connected in a 20 second crapspew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. if we get ANYTHING different than the couric type interview from her we know she's being told what
to say through an earpiece or something... I expect her to have dumb answers that are big on generalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. hey that's a thought. will she have a "Bush Hump" strapped on?
Better watch her back. LITERALLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Know what? If this thread doesn't get kicked enough,
I'd like to start another new thread about exactly that. Would you mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. not a prob eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. She doesn't think it matters?
Must be the fundie religious whackery she espouses, because to everyone in the real world, it does matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. At the end of her spiel, Joe should turn to her and say, "That's a lovely story", then fall silent.
Eventually the moderator will ask Senator Biden for his view and he should respond, "Oh, I'm sorry, was that the answer to your question about her plans to deal with (the economy, health care, national security, etc)?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Heidegger (?) said
"the limits of my language are the limits of my world."

My guess is that her world is really very lonely, filled with noise and oddly named children just to try to drown it all out.


And somebody, please correct me if it wasn't Heidegger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC