helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 10:31 AM
Original message |
HOLY CRAP, have you guys seen this???? |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-09-08 10:44 AM by helderheid
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
2. For eight years we have asked for this to be addressed. |
|
It continues to be ignored. The voter is on her/his own to fight to secure her/his vote at election time. We throw lots of money into last minute lawsuites, and then we find out that the oversight and transparency is not being allowed. The makers of the software for these machines have more protection than the voter. With all the data that has been used here in Wisconsin, two data bases full, they still can't get it correct. There answer according to the Rep. Attorney General is to ask for more. Wisconsin Attorney General Van Hollen is suing the Government accountability Board to make sure that they get to collect more data. I think that this is another smoke screen. Even if we give them our blood it will be mismanaged to purge the voter. This collection of data is a lose/lose for the voter.
|
progressivebydesign
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Can you please change your subject line so that more people will look at this? |
|
and will you add some detail to your post to get more people clicking on it? Your point is very worthy, but you'll miss out on a lot of people here if you don't make it more clear. Not trying to be the post police, but I get sad when worthy threads are doomed by vague headlines and mystery links. :grouphug:
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Too late, but you're free to make your own thread. It is VITAL info. What made you click? :) |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Just curiosity this time, but |
|
I usually ignore the "Holy crap -- look at what I saw" threads.
From time to time I look at them, for the same reason you slow down to look at an accident on the highway. But I never click on a link in them, unless the OP tells me why I'm doing that.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Thanks - please do make another thread! |
crossroads
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
7. To combat election manipulation -- Steal Back Your Vote dot com |
loudsue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Obama did not think that 2004 was stolen. He said it was "conspiracy theory" |
|
in one of his books. I wonder what his boots on the ground are reporting to his campaign, and if he realizes NOW what everyone tried to tell him....and what he poo-pooed for so long.
The election fraud perpetrated by the republican party for the past 10 years (and probably longer) is as treasonous and un-American as anything on the planet. The Dems who have chosen to keep their head in the sand are going to have to deal with it sooner or later.
Better yet, maybe their DONORS will raise holy hell. All we need to do is get through to Warren Buffett and George Soros, and we'll see some action? I don't know what it will take.
:kick: & rec.
|
TooRaLoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-09-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |