Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Utah Valley University prof says Obama will win big

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:18 AM
Original message
Utah Valley University prof says Obama will win big
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 02:19 AM by Drunken Irishman


http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/284271/17/">UVU prof says Obama will win big



DeSart and partner Thomas Holbrook, of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, called a close victory for President George Bush in 2004 and a neck-and-neck win for Al Gore in 2000. (OK, that one is still up for debate.)

DeSart's work -- quoted by the likes of the Wall Street Journal -- gives Obama a 354-184 electoral victory on Nov. 4, even though Utah will likely give McCain a comfortable statewide victory with its five electoral votes. DeSart's projection relies heavily on state -- not national -- polling results because of the importance of the Electoral College.

...

Students groan in class when he tells them the projections. (Obama will also win with nearly 53 percent of the popular vote, he says.)

Is there any chance McCain might win?

"I suppose anything is possible, but at this point it looks like a very big hill for him to climb," DeSart said. "The only thing he has to hope for at this point is the infamous October surprise."

The model is always being tuned and this year includes a national poll variable not used before. But other methods of tweaking have been discarded because they made the prediction less accurate.

Aside from the Wall Street Journal, DeSart and Holbrook's work has cropped up everywhere from the U.S. to Poland to Denmark.

Still not convinced? Would you wager a bet?

"It's probably not wise," says DeSart before pausing. "That sounds like I'm bragging. I think my colleagues realize this is a fairly accurate model."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let it Be!
Let it be, let it be, let it be. Whisper words of wisdom, let it be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds good to me....
:thumbsup:

Between this and the Scholastic voting, it is starting to look very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. please, let it be true. I cannot imagine the damage to us
in this country if something shocking and craven took place to attempt to steal it for McCain with everything so obviously tilting toward Obama at this late date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can't believe there'd be 47% voting for McCain or third-party.
But then I don't know offhand what the largest popular vote win was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. In modern American history? Probably LBJ in 1964.
He won with 61% of the popular vote.

Nixon won with 60% in 1972.

Reagan won with 58% in 1984.

If Obama wins with 53%, it'll be the highest percentage a candidate has received since Bush Senior in 1988 (53% as well).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I just found this:
In 1936 FDR defeated Landon with a 24.3% margin in the popular vote, which exceeds Nixon's 23.2% margin in 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting. Here's a link to the article in PS, for those who are interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. And Here's The Professor's Webpage:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC