Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton nixes idea of serving on Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
amyrose2712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:06 PM
Original message
Clinton nixes idea of serving on Supreme Court
From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

(CNN) — It’s a question that arose even before Hillary Clinton abandoned her presidential bid four months ago: What's next for the junior senator from New York?

Definitely not a spot on the Supreme Court, and likely not a bid to be Senate Majority Leader or President of the United States, she told Fox News Tuesday.

Asked directly about rumors she may have her eye on the bench, Clinton said there was “zero” chance of that happening: "I have no interest in doing that," she said, laughing.

Speculation mounted it may be a possibility after Lawrence Tribe, a constitutional law expert at the Harvard Law School who is advising Obama's campaign, said last spring he thought Clinton may be a good fit for the high court.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder why?
The law is where her true heart and talent lies. My second question is-why is she talking to Fox News?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe she would like to be Attorney General??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love Thom Hartmann's idea of Hillary as Senate Majority Leader.
She'd be a lot stronger than Harry Reid. She'd push a lot harder for national health insurance and other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That makes a lot of sense to me... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I thingk majority leader is a better "fit"
for Hillary. Whatever her next move is, it will benefit us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, Lawrence Tribe
would be an excellent choice for the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope08 Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Totally agree
Would be a great choice, except for the fact that he is getting up in years. Right on all the issues and with a Dem Senate he would sail through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I hadn't thought about his age
But after looking it up, you're definitely right - as great as he would be, a President Obama would be better served in nominating someone 20 years younger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. What about Bill?
He'd make a good justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. What about Sonia Sotomayor for SCOTUS? Hillary for AG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. she doesn't seem the type for it
she's not an academic for one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. In a way I can see why a popular politician would reject that
they need to be out in the limelight. Not hidden away under a stack of books. Supreme court types are probably more quiet and introverted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. No? What about Bill, then?
I'd love for Obama to put a Clinton on the court just to piss off the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC