Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'd rather Repukes talk about ACORN than Wright and Khalidi ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:20 PM
Original message
I'd rather Repukes talk about ACORN than Wright and Khalidi ...
Let's face it, Republicans have no message to talk to voters about, so they are going to be spending the last few weeks of the campaign trying to stoke voter anger. That being the case, I'd just as soon they talk about ACORN than about Wright, Khalidi or some other topic that has more power to stoke racist anger.

They are no doubt setting the stage for voter challenges, but I really don't see that as being an issue unless they convince huge numbers of voters to change their mind in the last few weeks. It wouldn't even be close at this point. So all things considered, I say let Drudge, Fox and Limbaugh spend their time talking about ACORN- that's not as bad for Obama as some other things I can think of, and when you're 7-8 points behind like McCain, every day is crucial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah but in the tiny ignorant mind of many people a "black man" (biracial) can only win by cheating.
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 02:23 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
I thnik it's all part of the same bullshit tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also, isn't there a picture of McCain sitting at an ACORN rally? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's a good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are going to roll them out in succession /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Probably, but each day with a weak message is a lost day for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The plan would be....

That each individual attack is "weak", but after a while some voters get a "lot of smoke, must be fire" impression.

I think they are doing it too slowly, though. They should be rolling the attacks more rapidly than a countermessage can catch up to them.

So, while Obama surrogates are saying "he was eight years old" with respect to Ayers, the current McCain smear is "Wright". And then when "Wright" is being addressed, the smear is "Odinga"... and so on.

Maybe the problem is that they don't have enough of them to keep rolling to November 4th, so they are running the staging too slowly.

Either way, it is clear that independents are persuadables aren't being moved by it. If they were that easy to sway, they'd have made up their minds by now. People have real world concerns and want to hear things of substance that matter directly to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. The GOP goes after ACORN every election..
they can't have these people voting. That is way more important than Reverend Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree sort of, but there are problems
for one thing, many comments I've seen on various sites do discuss ACORN in very racist tones, and are full of bad information.

I do find it funny (almost) to suddenly hear the right whine about how they are concerned for election integrity! Of course, they just don't get it - they think Mickey Mouse will show up to vote - and provide ID I assume, but never once question the voting machines being owned by one company.

Ugh. The sad part: even if there's a blowout, we're going to have to listen to them whine and whine and say it was stolen. I'd be a LOT more sympathetic if they had not made fun of me and told me to "get over it" a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC