charlie and algernon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 05:48 PM
Original message |
Just said on CNN, Hagel's wife to attend debate with Michelle |
|
could an endorsement be close behind from Chuck?
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Wow - That is something that should shake of McCain |
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Chuck Hagel won't endorse Obama. The GOP, unlike the dems, destroys traitors. |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hagel is retiring from the Senate. |
|
And I wouldn't be too surprised to see him take a job in an Obama administration. (Possibly Secretary of Defense, if Gates decides not to stay on.)
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Wow I didn't know that. |
|
I hope he does give an endorsement then.
|
rvablue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Chuck Hagel is voluntarily retiring |
|
from his Senate seat.
Doesn't really seem to have any further ambitions for elected office and hence, nothing to fear from the GOP.
The fact that the Mrs. is attending the debate with Michelle is huge....it basically is an endorsement.
|
SeeHopeWin
(649 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
7. She's got a crush on Obama. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Interesting..and good buzz 'cause you know how |
|
the corporatemediawhore$$ like to ignore the Obamas and build up the ratnests.
Except the last debate when the mccains scurried off with their tails between their legs.}(
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |