Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contractor's Letter Contradicts McCain Camp Spin On Verizon Controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:31 AM
Original message
Contractor's Letter Contradicts McCain Camp Spin On Verizon Controversy

A document obtained by the Huffington Post contradicts recent claims made by Verizon and the McCain campaign about the cell tower placed on John McCain's Sedona, Arizona ranch earlier this year.

In a May 28 letter, a contractor hired by Verizon asked the local planning department to approve a temporary cell tower until the utility could construct a "permanent facility" on McCain's property.

The document (viewable here), is important, since the Verizon contractor's admission of the company's intent to construct a permanent cell tower contradicts statements made both by the company as well as the McCain campaign in the aftermath of a Washington Post story which alleged that the Senator received special treatment from the utility when it considered placing a permanent cell phone tower specifically for the McCain family's use.

So far, denials from the McCain campaign and Verizon have centered around a crucial time line distinction that the new document upends.

According to McCain's campaign, a proposed permanent cell tower on the Senator's Sedona ranch, originally asked for by Cindy McCain in 2007, was separately rejected by Verizon before the Secret Service made a request in May 2008 for a temporary tower in line with its duties protecting a major party nominee.

Regarding the temporary cell towers -- from both Verizon and AT&T -- that now sit on McCain's property, spokesman Brian Rogers has claimed: "Neither of these temporary facilities relate to Mrs. McCain's previous request to Verizon Wireless, via the company's website and as a customer of Verizon Wireless, for the company to explore providing permanent service to that area."

Similarly, a Verizon representative has stated that the company "received a request from Mrs. McCain, but declined. Subsequent to that, the Secret Service made a legitimate request for a temporary tower for its work and Verizon complied as is required by our contract with the agency."

In both statements, the timeline claims are iron clad: Cindy McCain's request for a permanent cell tower was lodged and rejected, as a complete and finished process, before the Secret Service's second request for a temporary tower. When news broke Thursday that Cindy's original requested permit from Verizon was, in fact, still open, the utility brushed aside that inconvenient fact as a formality -- saying that it makes sense to keep requests open for a certain period of time, in case the Secret Service's needs change.

But the new document puts a wrinkle in the underlying claim that Cindy McCain's request and the Secret Service request proceeded in separate fashion, at entirely different times.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/17/contractors-letter-contra_n_135565.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
panAmerican Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good detective work, HuffPo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Atlantic did a piece last night too
about how the McCain response is kind of shady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC